Normalized Movement Quality Measures for Therapeutic Robots Strongly Correlate With Clinical Motor Impairment Measures

In this paper, we analyze the correlations between four clinical measures (Fugl-Meyer upper extremity scale, Motor Activity Log, Action Research Arm Test, and Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test) and four robotic measures (smoothness of movement, trajectory error, average number of target hits per minute, and mean tangential speed), used to assess motor recovery. Data were gathered as part of a hybrid robotic and traditional upper extremity rehabilitation program for nine stroke patients. Smoothness of movement and trajectory error, temporally and spatially normalized measures of movement quality defined for point-to-point movements, were found to have significant moderate to strong correlations with all four of the clinical measures. The strong correlations suggest that smoothness of movement and trajectory error may be used to compare outcomes of different rehabilitation protocols and devices effectively, provide improved resolution for tracking patient progress compared to only pre- and post-treatment measurements, enable accurate adaptation of therapy based on patient progress, and deliver immediate and useful feedback to the patient and therapist.

[1]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  P. Stratford,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[3]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2009, Circulation.

[4]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  Interactive robots for neuro-rehabilitation. , 2004, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[8]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[9]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Automating Arm Movement Training Following Severe Stroke: Functional Exercises With Quantitative Feedback in a Gravity-Reduced Environment , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Dewald,et al.  Augmenting Clinical Evaluation of Hemiparetic Arm Movement With a Laboratory-Based Quantitative Measurement of Kinematics as a Function of Limb Loading , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[12]  S. Page,et al.  Modified constraint induced therapy: a randomized feasibility and efficacy study. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  Marcia K. O'Malley,et al.  Design of a Haptic Arm Exoskeleton for Training and Rehabilitation , 2004 .

[14]  P. Dario,et al.  Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[15]  H.I. Krebs,et al.  Wrist rehabilitation following stroke: initial clinical results , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[16]  Nilanjan Sarkar,et al.  Intelligent Control Framework for Robotic Rehabilitation after Stroke , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: From Evidence-Based to Science-Based Rehabilitation , 2002, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[18]  Fong-Chin Su,et al.  The Constructs of Kinematic Measures for Reaching Performance in Stroke Patients , 2008 .

[19]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[20]  B. Volpe,et al.  Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Design, Control and Performance of RiceWrist: A Force Feedback Wrist Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation and Training , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[22]  N. Hogan,et al.  Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Technology for recovery after stroke , 2005 .

[25]  P A Thompson,et al.  The Motor Activity Log-28 , 2006, Neurology.

[26]  Marcia Kilchenman O'Malley,et al.  Comparison of robotic and clinical motor function improvement measures for sub-acute stroke patients , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[27]  J.M. Winters,et al.  Enhanced TheraJoy technology for use in upper-extremity stroke rehabilitation , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[28]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  A robot for wrist rehabilitation , 2001, 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  D. Hoffman,et al.  Step-tracking movements of the wrist in humans. I. Kinematic analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  An innovative system to enhance upper-extremity stroke rehabilitation , 2003, Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37439).

[33]  J. Whitall,et al.  Temporal coordination of the arms during bilateral simultaneous and sequential movements in patients with chronic hemiparesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  D.S. Andreasen,et al.  Exoskeleton with EMG based active assistance for rehabilitation , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[36]  Marcia K. O'Malley,et al.  Validation of a smooth movement model for a human reaching task , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[37]  H. Levin,et al.  Assessing and inducing neuroplasticity with transcranial magnetic stimulation and robotics for motor function. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  E. Taub,et al.  A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Upper Extremity After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[39]  Jiping He,et al.  Design and Control of RUPERT: A Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.