Scale-Free Exponents of Resting State provide a Biomarker for Typical and Atypical Brain Activity

Scale-free networks (SFN) arise from simple growth processes, which can encourage efficient, centralized and fault tolerant communication (1). Recently its been shown that stable network hub structure is governed by a phase transition at exponents (>2.0) causing a dramatic change in network structure including a loss of global connectivity, an increasing minimum dominating node set, and a shift towards increasing connectivity growth compared to node growth. Is this SFN shift identifiable in atypical brain activity? The Pareto Distribution (P(D)~D^-\b{eta}) on the hub Degree (D) is a signature of scale-free networks. During resting-state, we assess Degree exponents across a large range of neurotypical and atypical subjects. We use graph complexity theory to provide a predictive theory of the brain network structure. Results. We show that neurotypical resting-state fMRI brain activity possess scale-free Pareto exponents (1.8 se .01) in a single individual scanned over 66 days as well as in 60 different individuals (1.8 se .02). We also show that 60 individuals with Autistic Spectrum Disorder, and 60 individuals with Schizophrenia have significantly higher (>2.0) scale-free exponents (2.4 se .03, 2.3 se .04), indicating more fractionated and less controllable dynamics in the brain networks revealed in resting state. Finally we show that the exponent values vary with phenotypic measures of atypical disease severity indicating that the global topology of the network itself can provide specific diagnostic biomarkers for atypical brain activity.

[1]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[2]  R. Buckner,et al.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[4]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  Deanna M Barch,et al.  Resting state functional connectivity of five neural networks in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. , 2013, Journal of affective disorders.

[6]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  The Influence of the Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations on Resting-State Functional Connectivity , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[7]  A. Fleisher,et al.  Alterations of Directional Connectivity among Resting-State Networks in Alzheimer Disease , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Reduced functional connectivity within and between ‘social’ resting state networks in autism spectrum conditions , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[9]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Resting state fMRI: A personal history , 2012, NeuroImage.

[10]  Yu-Feng Zang,et al.  Resting-state fMRI studies in epilepsy , 2012, Neuroscience Bulletin.

[11]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  Dominating scale-free networks with variable scaling exponent: heterogeneous networks are not difficult to control , 2012 .

[12]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[14]  Clark Glymour,et al.  Multi-subject search correctly identifies causal connections and most causal directions in the DCM models of the Smith et al. simulation study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[15]  Karl J. Friston.  Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review , 2011, Brain Connect..

[16]  Ralph-Axel Müller,et al.  Underconnected, but how? A survey of functional connectivity MRI studies in autism spectrum disorders. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Six problems for causal inference from fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data , 2007, SIAM Rev..

[20]  M. Just,et al.  Functional and anatomical cortical underconnectivity in autism: evidence from an FMRI study of an executive function task and corpus callosum morphometry. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  Silke Dodel,et al.  Detection of signal synchronizations in resting-state fMRI datasets , 2006, NeuroImage.

[22]  M. Marsili,et al.  Scale-free networks with an exponent less than two. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  M. Lowe,et al.  Activity and Connectivity of Brain Mood Regulating Circuit in Depression: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Study , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW , 2004 .

[27]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Evolution of Networks-From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW S N Dorogovtsev and J F F Mendes , 2004 .

[28]  O. Sporns,et al.  Organization, development and function of complex brain networks , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[30]  Tom Burr,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search , 2003, Technometrics.

[31]  S. Havlin,et al.  Scale-free networks are ultrasmall. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[32]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[34]  P. Spirtes,et al.  Causation, Prediction, and Search, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[35]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[36]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[37]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  V. Rich.  Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[39]  R. Quandt,et al.  Old and new methods of estimation and the pareto distribution , 1966 .