Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: an experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor.

It was hypothesized that self-sacrificing behavior is positively related to the salience of consequences for others and to the salience of the actor's personal responsibility in an appeal for help, and negatively related to the odds of incurring costs. Theoretically, the former two variables promote activation of moral norms, while the latter fosters neutralization of norms. These variables were manipulated in appeals to 144 subjects in a field experiment to donate bone marrow. Volunteering increased with responsibility (p <.05), but was unrelated to odds. The relationship between volunteering and consequences under 1/25 odds was curvilinear, with high salience of consequences producing the lowest rate of volunteering. To explain this curvilinear relationship, it was proposed that psychological reactance is expressed overtly as refusal when pressure in an appeal seems illegitimate. Volunteering was positively related to socioeconomic status (p < .01). The strikingly high rate of volunteering is traced to the momentum of compliance.

[1]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Success, failure, and social responsibility. , 1966 .

[2]  R. B. Darlington,et al.  Displacement of guilt-produced altruistic behavior. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Model, need, and cost effects in helping behavior. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  E. Sadalla,et al.  Behavioral consequences of transgression: I. The effects of social recognition. , 1966 .

[5]  Irving L. Janis,et al.  Effects of Fear Arousal on Attitude Change: Recent Developments in Theory and Experimental Research1 , 1967 .

[6]  H. Hornstein,et al.  Influence of a model's feeling about his behavior and his relevance as a comparison other on observers' helping behavior. , 1968 .

[7]  I. Horowitz Effect of choice and locus of dependence on helping behavior. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  F. Nye,et al.  Class And Conformity , 1969 .

[9]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: The effect of guilt. , 1967 .

[10]  H. Kelley Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[11]  B. Latané,et al.  Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  A. Gross,et al.  Some effects of guilt on compliance. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  J. Clausen,et al.  Parent attitudes toward participation of their children in polio vaccine trials. , 1954, American journal of public health and the nation's health.

[14]  R. Kirk Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[15]  G. M. White,et al.  Observation and rehearsal as determinants of prosocial behavior. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  H. Leventhal,et al.  Findings and Theory in the Study of Fear Communications , 1970 .

[17]  T. Brock On interpreting the effects of transgression upon compliance. , 1969 .

[18]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Responsibility and dependency. , 1963 .