Spatial patterns in species distributions reveal biodiversity change
暂无分享,去创建一个
Richard Fox | David B. Roy | Chris D. Thomas | William E. Kunin | Robert J. Wilson | D. Roy | C. Thomas | W. Kunin | R. Fox | R. Wilson
[1] Brian D. Ripley,et al. Spatial Statistics: Ripley/Spatial Statistics , 2005 .
[2] B. Lyon. Tactics of parasitic American coots: host choice and the pattern of egg dispersion among host nests , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[3] William E. Kunin,et al. Scale Dependency of Rarity, Extinction Risk, and Conservation Priority , 2003 .
[4] Bruce E. Lyon,et al. Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism , 2003, Nature.
[5] M. Delibes,et al. Internal structure and patterns of contraction in the geographic range of the Iberian lynx , 2002 .
[6] D. Lahti,et al. How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[7] J. K. Hill,et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change , 2001, Nature.
[8] Hans Van Dyck,et al. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe's worst case scenario? , 2001 .
[9] J. Asher. The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland , 2001 .
[10] M. Villard,et al. Geographic range structure in North American landbrids: variation with migratory strategy, trophic level, and breeding habitat , 2000 .
[11] J. Harte,et al. Self-similarity and clustering in the spatial distribution of species. , 2000, Science.
[12] N. Davies,et al. Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo , 2000, Nature.
[13] G. Mace,et al. Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under Uncertainty , 2000 .
[14] David A. Keith,et al. Sensitivity analyses of decision rules in World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List criteria using Australian plants , 2000 .
[15] S. Hubbell,et al. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. , 2000, Science.
[16] Mark V. Lomolino,et al. Dynamic biogeography and conservation of endangered species , 2000, Nature.
[17] I. Jamieson,et al. High Rates of Conspecific Brood Parasitism and Egg Rejection in Coots and Moorhens in Ephemeral Wetlands in Namibia , 2000 .
[18] Thomas M. Brooks,et al. Time Lag between Deforestation and Bird Extinction in Tropical Forest Fragments , 1999 .
[19] M. Warren,et al. Flight areas of British butterflies: assessing species status and decline , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[20] J. N. Thompson,et al. The evolution of species interactions. , 1999, Science.
[21] Brian Huntley,et al. Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly's range margin , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[22] Gibbs,et al. Host-race formation in the common cuckoo , 1998, Science.
[23] W. Kunin,et al. Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales , 1998, Science.
[24] R. Furness,et al. The demands of incubation and avian clutch size , 1998 .
[25] C. Johnson,et al. Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance , 1998, Nature.
[26] S. I. Rothstein,et al. Parasitic birds and their hosts , 1998 .
[27] M. Avery,et al. Assessing national conservation priorities: an improved red list of British butterflies , 1997 .
[28] T. F. Hansen,et al. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[29] M. Sorenson. Effects of intra- and interspecific brood parasitism on a precocial host, the canvasback, Aythya valisineria , 1997 .
[30] S. McRae,et al. Identifying eggs of conspecific brood parasites in the field: a cautionary note , 1997 .
[31] A. Kacelnik,et al. Recognition errors and probability of parasitism determine whether reed warblers should accept or reject mimetic cuckoo eggs , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[32] G. C. Stevens,et al. Spatial Variation in Abundance , 1995 .
[33] M. Sorenson. Evidence of Conspecific Nest Parasitism and Egg Discrimination in the Sora , 1995 .
[34] C. Thomas,et al. Estimating rates of butterfly decline from distribution maps: The effect of scale , 1995 .
[35] Graeme Caughley,et al. Directions in conservation biology , 1994 .
[36] Arnon Lotem,et al. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium , 1992 .
[37] B. Groombridge. Global biodiversity: status of the earth's living resources. , 1992 .
[38] B. Lyon,et al. Mode of development and interspecific avian brood parasitism , 1991 .
[39] Georgina M. Mace,et al. Assessing Extinction Threats: Toward a Reevaluation of IUCN Threatened Species Categories , 1991 .
[40] T. Arnold. Food Limitation And The Adaptive Significance Of Clutch Size In American Coots (fulica Americana) , 1991 .
[41] S. Rothstein. A Model System for Coevolution: Avian Brood Parasitism , 1990 .
[42] N. Davies,et al. Egg mimicry by cuckoos Cuculus canorus in relation to discrimination by hosts , 1988, Nature.
[43] S. Freeman. EGG VARIABILITY AND CONSPECIFIC NEST PARASITISM IN THE PLOCEUS WEAVERBIRDS , 1988 .
[44] S. I. Rothstein,et al. Crypsis Versus Mimicry and the Color of Shiny Cowbird Eggs , 1987, The American Naturalist.
[45] J. Thomas,et al. Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland , 1984 .
[46] R. B. Payne,et al. The Ecology of Brood Parasitism in Birds , 1977 .
[47] M. W. Weller. Experimental Parasitism of American Coot Nests , 1971 .