Metagenomic comparison of direct and indirect soil DNA extraction approaches.

Full pyrosequencing runs of both direct-extracted (high yield, low DNA size) and indirect-extracted DNA (low yield, high DNA size) from the same prairie soil show that the sequence distribution of the majority of the metabolic functions and species detected were statistically similar. Although some microbial functions differed at the 95% confidence interval in bootstrap analyses, the overall functional diversity was the same.

[1]  O. Rasmussen,et al.  Development and Application of a New Method To Extract Bacterial DNA from Soil Based on Separation of Bacteria from Soil with Cation-Exchange Resin , 1992, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  T. Vogel,et al.  High molecular weight DNA recovery from soils prerequisite for biotechnological metagenomic library construction. , 2005, Journal of microbiological methods.

[3]  Aurélien Ginolhac,et al.  Drugs from hidden bugs: their discovery via untapped resources. , 2008, Research in microbiology.

[4]  R. Schmid,et al.  Comparative study of methods for extraction and purification of environmental DNA from soil and sludge samples , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[5]  V. Ramisse,et al.  Quantification of Bias Related to the Extraction of DNA Directly from Soils , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  Soil DNA extraction and assessment of the fate of Mycobacterium chlorophenolicum strain PCP-1 in different soils by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequence based most-probable-number PCR and immunofluorescence , 1997, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[7]  Robert G. Beiko,et al.  Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities , 2010, Bioinform..

[8]  Tom O. Delmont,et al.  Accessing the Soil Metagenome for Studies of Microbial Diversity , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  B. Prior,et al.  Comparative analysis of environmental DNA extraction and purification methods from different humic acid‐rich soils , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[10]  Andreas Wilke,et al.  phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes , 2022 .

[11]  P. Simonet,et al.  Quantification of bacterial subgroups in soil: comparison of DNA extracted directly from soil or from cells previously released by density gradient centrifugation. , 2001, Environmental microbiology.

[12]  L. Walker,et al.  A quantitative analysis of DNA extraction and purification from compost. , 2003, Journal of microbiological methods.

[13]  E. Wellington,et al.  Isolation of high molecular weight DNA from soil for cloning into BAC vectors. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.

[14]  G. Sayler,et al.  The extraction and purification of microbial DNA from sediments , 1987 .

[15]  Mark J. Bailey,et al.  TerraGenome: a consortium for the sequencing of a soil metagenome , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[16]  R M Atlas,et al.  Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  L. Shimkets,et al.  Comparison of methods of DNA extraction from stream sediments , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.