The ProM Framework: A New Era in Process Mining Tool Support

Under the umbrella of buzzwords such as “Business Activity Monitoring” (BAM) and “Business Process Intelligence” (BPI) both academic (e.g., EMiT, Little Thumb, InWoLvE, Process Miner, and MinSoN) and commercial tools (e.g., ARIS PPM, HP BPI, and ILOG JViews) have been developed. The goal of these tools is to extract knowledge from event logs (e.g., transaction logs in an ERP system or audit trails in a WFM system), i.e., to do process mining. Unfortunately, tools use different formats for reading/storing log files and present their results in different ways. This makes it difficult to use different tools on the same data set and to compare the mining results. Furthermore, some of these tools implement concepts that can be very useful in the other tools but it is often difficult to combine tools. As a result, researchers working on new process mining techniques are forced to build a mining infrastructure from scratch or test their techniques in an isolated way, disconnected from any practical applications. To overcome these kind of problems, we have developed the ProM framework, i.e., an “pluggable” environment for process mining. The framework is flexible with respect to the input and output format, and is also open enough to allow for the easy reuse of code during the implementation of new process mining ideas. This paper introduces the ProM framework and gives an overview of the plug-ins that have been developed.

[1]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data using little thumb , 2003, Integr. Comput. Aided Eng..

[2]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Discovering Workflow Performance Models from Timed Logs , 2002, EDCIS.

[3]  Wolfgang Reisig,et al.  Lectures on Petri Nets I: Basic Models , 1996, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[4]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Mining Social Networks: Uncovering Interaction Patterns in Business Processes , 2004, Business Process Management.

[5]  Jianmin Wang,et al.  A novel approach for process mining based on event types , 2007, IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2007).

[6]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[7]  Laure Petrucci,et al.  The Petri Net Markup Language: Concepts, Technology, and Tools , 2003, ICATPN.

[8]  J. Nunamaker,et al.  Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1999 .

[9]  Boudewijn F. van Dongen,et al.  Workflow mining: A survey of issues and approaches , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[10]  Dimitrios Gunopulos,et al.  Mining Process Models from Workflow Logs , 1998, EDBT.

[11]  Joachim Herbst,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach to Workflow Management , 2000, ECML.

[12]  Fabio Casati,et al.  Improving Business Process Quality through Exception Understanding, Prediction, and Prevention , 2001, VLDB.

[13]  Enric Plaza,et al.  Machine Learning: ECML 2000 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[14]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Applications and Theory of Petri Nets 2003 , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  Thomas Teufel,et al.  Sap R/3 Process Oriented Implementation , 1998 .

[16]  Hongwei Ding,et al.  A Novel Approach for Process Mining Based on Event Types , 2007, IEEE SCC.

[17]  Yanbo Han,et al.  Engineering and Deployment of Cooperative Information Systems , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[18]  van der Wmp Wil Aalst,et al.  Using genetic algorithms to mine process models : representation, operators and results , 2004 .

[19]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Workflow-based process monitoring and controlling-technical and organizational issues , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Alexander L. Wolf,et al.  Discovering models of software processes from event-based data , 1998, TSEM.

[21]  Wil M. P. van der Aalst,et al.  Process mining: a research agenda , 2004, Comput. Ind..