A methodology to urban air quality assessment during large time periods of winter using computational fluid dynamic models

Abstract The representativeness of point measurements in urban areas is limited due to the strong heterogeneity of the atmospheric flows in cities. To get information on air quality in the gaps between measurement points, and have a 3D field of pollutant concentration, Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) models can be used. However, unsteady simulations during time periods of the order of months, often required for regulatory purposes, are not possible for computational reasons. The main objective of this study is to develop a methodology to evaluate the air quality in a real urban area during large time periods by means of steady CFD simulations. One steady simulation for each inlet wind direction was performed and factors like the number of cars inside each street, the length of streets and the wind speed and direction were taken into account to compute the pollutant concentration. This approach is only valid in winter time when the pollutant concentrations are less affected by atmospheric chemistry. A model based on the steady-state Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations (RANS) and standard k-ɛ turbulence model was used to simulate a set of 16 different inlet wind directions over a real urban area (downtown Pamplona, Spain). The temporal series of NOx and PM10 and the spatial differences in pollutant concentration of NO2 and BTEX obtained were in agreement with experimental data. Inside urban canopy, an important influence of urban boundary layer dynamics on the pollutant concentration patterns was observed. Large concentration differences between different zones of the same square were found. This showed that concentration levels measured by an automatic monitoring station depend on its location in the street or square, and a modelling methodology like this is useful to complement the experimental information. On the other hand, this methodology can also be applied to evaluate abatement strategies by redistributing traffic emissions.

[1]  Jong‐Jin Baik,et al.  A numerical study of the effects of ambient wind direction on flow and dispersion in urban street canyons using the RNG k–ε turbulence model , 2004 .

[2]  Sandrine Anquetin,et al.  Pollutant dispersion and thermal effects in urban street canyons , 1996 .

[3]  J.-F. Sini,et al.  Thermal Effects on the Airflow in a Street Canyon – Nantes'99 Experimental Results and Model Simulations , 2002 .

[4]  Jörg Franke,et al.  The COST 732 Best Practice Guideline for CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment: a summary , 2011 .

[5]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  Numerical Modelling of the Turbulent Flow Developing Within and Over a 3-D Building Array, Part I: A High-Resolution Reynolds-Averaged Navier—Stokes Approach , 2004 .

[6]  Jong-Jin Baik,et al.  Modeling reactive pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon , 2007 .

[7]  S. Sillman The relation between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments , 1999 .

[8]  Zheng-Tong Xie,et al.  LES and RANS for Turbulent Flow over Arrays of Wall-Mounted Obstacles , 2006 .

[9]  Alberto Martilli,et al.  CFD simulation of airflow over a regular array of cubes. Part I: Three-dimensional simulation of the flow and validation with wind-tunnel measurements , 2007 .

[10]  Helen ApSimon,et al.  A numerical study of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in different two-dimensional street canyon configurations , 2003 .

[11]  Kit Ming Lam,et al.  Recent progress in CFD modelling of wind field and pollutant transport in street canyons , 2006 .

[12]  Zheng-Tong Xie,et al.  Large-eddy simulation for flow and dispersion in urban streets , 2009 .

[13]  J. Lodge Air quality guidelines for Europe: WHO regional publications, European series, No. 23, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland; WHO publications center USA, 49 Sheridan Avenue, Albany, NY 12210, 1987, xiii + 426 pp. price: Sw. fr. 60 , 1988 .

[14]  M. Schatzmann,et al.  Driving physical mechanisms of flow and dispersion in urban canopies , 2007 .

[15]  Fue-Sang Lien,et al.  A comparison of large Eddy simulations with a standard k–ε Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes model for the prediction of a fully developed turbulent flow over a matrix of cubes , 2003 .

[16]  Alison S. Tomlin,et al.  Flow field measurements in the proximity of an urban intersection in London, UK , 2005 .

[17]  David D. Apsley,et al.  Flow and dispersion over topography: A comparison between numerical and laboratory data for two-dimensional flows , 1997 .

[18]  R. G. Harrison,et al.  Coupling between air flow in streets and the well-developed boundary layer aloft , 2000 .

[19]  Erich J. Plate,et al.  Wind-tunnel study of concentration fields in street canyons , 1999 .

[20]  J. Santamaría,et al.  Spatial and temporal trends of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in a rural area of northern Spain. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  J. Santamaría,et al.  Ambient air levels of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) in a medium size city in Northern Spain. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  R. Atkinson Atmospheric chemistry of VOCs and NOx , 2000 .

[23]  P. Richards,et al.  Appropriate boundary conditions for computational wind engineering models using the k-ε turbulence model , 1993 .

[24]  Michael Schatzmann,et al.  Study of line source characteristics for 2-D physical modelling of pollutant dispersion in street canyons , 1996 .

[25]  Julia E. Flaherty,et al.  Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulations of Plume Dispersion in Urban Oklahoma City , 2007 .