The responsive bystander: how social group membership and group size can encourage as well as inhibit bystander intervention.

Four experiments explored the interaction of group size, social categorization, and bystander behavior. In Study 1, increasing group size inhibited intervention in a street violence scenario when bystanders were strangers but encouraged intervention when bystanders were friends. Study 2 replicated and extended these findings to social category members. When gender identity was salient, group size encouraged intervention when bystanders and victim shared social category membership. In addition, group size interacted with context-specific norms that both inhibit and encourage helping. Study 3 used physical co-presence and gender identities to examine these social category effects. Increasing group size of women produced greater helping of a female victim, but increasing group size of men did not. Additionally, increasing numbers of out-group bystanders resulted in less intervention from women but more intervention from men. Study 4 replicated these findings with a measure of real-life helping behavior. Taken together, the findings indicate that the bystander effect is not a generic consequence of increasing group size. When bystanders share group-level psychological relationships, group size can encourage as well as inhibit helping.

[1]  Stephen M. Garcia,et al.  Crowded Minds : The Implicit Bystander Effect , 2002 .

[2]  A. Collins,et al.  The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: the parable of the 38 witnesses. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[3]  K. Durrheim,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Vignette Methodology: A Comparison of Written and Video Vignettes in Eliciting Responses about Date Rape , 2002 .

[4]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  D. Abrams,et al.  Being better by being right: subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Mark Levine,et al.  Identity and Emergency Intervention: How Social Group Membership and Inclusiveness of Group Boundaries Shape Helping Behavior , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[7]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[8]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping , 1997, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[9]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context , 1994 .

[10]  Mark Levine,et al.  Deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: The effects of visibility to the out‐group , 1994 .

[11]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Negative-state relief and the empathy—altruism hypothesis. , 1989 .

[12]  L. L. Shaw,et al.  Encouraging Words Concerning the Evidence for Altruism , 1991 .

[13]  Charles L. Gruder,et al.  Group cohesiveness, social norms, and bystander intervention. , 1983 .

[14]  M. Hogg,et al.  Book Review: Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes , 1991 .

[15]  David A. Schroeder,et al.  The arousal: Cost-reward model and the process of intervention , 1991 .

[16]  B. Latané,et al.  Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  S. Reicher "The Battle of Westminster": Developing the social identity model of crowd behaviour in order to explain the initiation and development of collective conflict. , 1996 .

[18]  C. Hendrick,et al.  Group Processes and Intergroup Relations , 1987 .

[19]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[20]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[21]  Richard A. Griggs,et al.  A Citation Analysis of Who's Who in Introductory Textbooks , 2002 .

[22]  C. Daniel Batson,et al.  Prosocial Motivation: Is it ever Truly Altruistic? , 1987 .

[23]  Mark Levine,et al.  On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. , 1994 .

[24]  J. Drury,et al.  The Intergroup Dynamics of Collective Empowerment: Substantiating the Social Identity Model of Crowd Behavior , 1999 .

[25]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Intergroup emotions: explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[27]  A. Eagly,et al.  Gender and Helping Behavior : A Meta-Analytic Review of the Social Psychological Literature , 2004 .

[28]  Mark Levine,et al.  Self‐Categorization and Bystander Non‐intervention: Two Experimental Studies , 2002 .

[29]  S. Reicher,et al.  More on deindividuation, power relations between groups and the expression of social identity: Three studies on the effects of visibility to the in‐group , 1998 .

[30]  Mark Levine,et al.  Rethinking Bystander Nonintervention: Social Categorization and the Evidence of Witnesses at the James Bulger Murder Trial , 1999 .

[31]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[32]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: when one into one equals oneness. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  J. Turner Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. , 2010 .

[34]  B. Latané,et al.  Ten years of research on group size and helping Psychological Bulletin Vol 89 , 1981 .

[35]  Frances Cherry,et al.  The Stubborn Particulars of Social Psychology: Essays on the Research Process , 1994 .

[36]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Prosocial emotions and helping: the moderating role of group membership. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Mark Levine,et al.  Saving Bulgaria's Jews : An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity , 2006 .

[38]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[39]  Clifford Stott,et al.  Crowds, context and identity: Dynamic categorization processes in the 'poll tax riot' , 2000 .

[40]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[41]  C. Batson The Altruism Question: Toward A Social-psychological Answer , 1991 .

[42]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .