Research Paper: The PEN-Ivory Project: Exploring User-interface Design for the Selection of Items from Large Controlled Vocabularies of Medicine

OBJECTIVE To explore different user-interface designs for structured progress note entry, with a long-term goal of developing design guidelines for user interfaces where users select items from large medical vocabularies. DESIGN The authors created eight different prototypes of a pen-based progress-note-writing system called PEN-Ivory. Each prototype allows physicians to write patient progress notes using simple pen-based gestures such as circle, line-out, and scratch-out. The result of an interaction with PEN-Ivory is a progress note in English prose. The eight prototypes were designed in a principled way, so that they differ from one another in just one of three different user-interface characteristics. MEASUREMENTS Five of the eight prototypes were tested by measuring the time it took 15 users, each using a distinct prototype, to document three patient cases consisting of a total of 63 medical findings. RESULTS The prototype that allowed the fastest data entry had the following three user-interface characteristics: it used a paging rather than a scrolling form, it used a fixed palette of modifiers rather than a dynamic "pop-up" palette, and it made available all findings from the controlled vocabulary at once rather than displaying only a subset of findings generated by analyzing the patient's problem list. CONCLUSION Even simple design changes to a user interface can make dramatic differences in user performance. The authors discuss possible influences on performance, such as positional constancy, user uncertainty and system anticipation, that may contribute significantly to the effectiveness of systems that display menus of items from large controlled vocabularies of medicine.

[1]  Stuart K. Card,et al.  User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus , 1982, CHI '82.

[2]  L M Fagan,et al.  PEN-Ivory: the design and evaluation of a pen-based computer system for structured data entry. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[3]  Benjamin L. Somberg,et al.  A comparison of rule-based and positionally constant arrangements of computer menu items , 1986, CHI '87.

[4]  R A Greenes,et al.  Evaluation of UltraSTAR: performance of a collaborative structured data entry system. , 1994, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[5]  W. Kratzer,et al.  Structured Reporting of Medical Findings: Evaluation of a System in Gastroenterology , 1992, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[6]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  Medical data: their acquisition, storage, and use , 1990 .

[7]  D W Simborg,et al.  The Johns Hopkins radiology reporting system. , 1976, Radiology.

[8]  P W Moorman,et al.  Towards unambiguous representation of patient data. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[9]  C Z Margolis,et al.  A computerized medical record with direct data entry for community clinics in Israel. , 1991, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[10]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  PEN&PAD: A Doctors' Workstation with Intelligent Data Entry and Summaries. , 1990 .

[11]  F Naeymi-Rad,et al.  IMR-entry (Intelligent Medical Record-Entry). , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[12]  E. B. Steen,et al.  The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[13]  Richard E. Granda,et al.  The effects of positional constancy on searching menus for information , 1983, CHI '83.

[14]  T G Tape,et al.  Increasing physician acceptance and use of the computerized ambulatory medical record. , 1991, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[15]  Stanley R. Parkinson,et al.  Organization of Broad Computer Menu Displays , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  James E. McDonald,et al.  Searching for Items in Menus: The Effects of Organization and Type of Target , 1983 .

[17]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Dynamic versus static menus: an exploratory comparison , 1989, SGCH.

[18]  T A Pryor,et al.  Pick from thousands: a collaborative processing model for coded data entry. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[19]  John I. Kiger,et al.  The Depth/Breadth Trade-Off in the Design of Menu-Driven User Interfaces , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[20]  Renate J. Roske-Hofstrand,et al.  The Optimal Number of Menu Options per Panel , 1986 .

[21]  Byron E. Bork,et al.  Medical Records, Medical Education, and Patient Care , 1975 .

[22]  R A Greenes,et al.  Recording, retrieval and review of medical data by physician-computer interaction. , 1970, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[24]  R A Greenes,et al.  An on-line computer facility for systematized input of radiology reports. , 1969, Radiology.

[25]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Minimizing User Search Time in Menu Retrieval Systems , 1985 .

[26]  James N. MacGregor,et al.  Optimizing the Structure of Database Menu Indexes: A Decision Model of Menu Search , 1986 .

[27]  J. Myers,et al.  The INTERNIST-1/QUICK MEDICAL REFERENCE project--status report. , 1986, The Western journal of medicine.

[28]  Elliot R. Siegel,et al.  Bibliographic-retrieval systems , 1990 .

[29]  Harry E. Pople,et al.  An Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal Medicine , 1982 .

[30]  M Maksud,et al.  PureMD: a Computerized Patient Record software for direct data entry by physicians using a keyboard-free pen-based portable computer. , 1992, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[31]  Else Nygren Reading documents in intensive care I : Pattern recognition and encoding of characteristics of the information media , 1991 .

[32]  W W Stead,et al.  Adopting TMR for physician/nurse use. , 1991, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[33]  T. K. Landauer,et al.  Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: breadth, depth, and width , 1985, CHI '85.

[34]  A Gouveia-Oliveira,et al.  Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data. , 1991, Endoscopy.

[35]  L M Fagan,et al.  A computer-based tool for generation of progress notes. , 1993, Proceedings. Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care.

[36]  Christian Heath,et al.  Tasks-in-interaction: paper and screen based documentation in collaborative activity , 1992, CSCW '92.