Guide for Pavement Friction

This report documents the research performed under NCHRP Project 1-43. It describes the work activities undertaken in the study and presents the results of those activities toward the development of the Guide for Pavement Friction. The information provided in this report serves as the basis for many of the guidelines and recommendations contained in the Guide. The information will be of interest to highway materials, construction, pavement management, safety, design, and research engineers, as well as others concerned with the friction and related surface characteristics of highway pavements. Using information collected through detailed literature reviews and surveys/interviews with state highway agencies, this report discusses a variety of aspects regarding pavement friction. It describes and illustrates the importance of friction in highway safety, as well as the principles of friction, as defined by micro-texture and macro-texture. It identifies the factors affecting friction and examines the ways that friction can be measured (equipment and procedures) and expressed (reporting indices). Most importantly, it presents valuable information on (a) the management of friction on existing highway pavements and (b) the design of new highway surfaces with adequate friction. This information focuses on techniques for monitoring friction and crashes and determining the need for remedial action, as well as identifying combinations of aggregate (micro-texture) and mix types/surface texturing methods (macro-texture) that satisfy friction design requirements. The report includes various conclusions and recommendations based on the results of the study, and it features five appendixes containing supplemental information on friction.

[1]  Wb Horne,et al.  A Method for Rating the Skid Resistance and Micro/Macrotexture Characteristics of Wet Pavements , 1983 .

[2]  W E Meyer SYNTHESIS OF FRICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS RESEARCH , 1982 .

[3]  Nikiforos Stamatiadis,et al.  Development of Accident Reduction Factors , 1996 .

[4]  R Y Liang BLENDING PROPORTIONS OF HIGH SKID AND LOW SKID AGGREGATE , 2003 .

[5]  Kevin K McGhee,et al.  High-speed texture measurement of pavements. , 2003 .

[6]  David G Peshkin,et al.  HIGH VOLUME/HIGH SPEED ASPHALT ROADWAY PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE SURFACE TREATMENTS , 2001 .

[7]  Yiping Wu AGGREGATE TOUGHNESS / ABRASION RESISTANCE AND DURABILITY TESTS RELATED TO ASPHALT CONCRETE PERFORMANCE IN PAVEMENTS By , 2008 .

[8]  Don L Ivey,et al.  TEXAS SKID INITIATED ACCIDENT REDUCTION PROGRAM , 1992 .

[9]  B W Sullivan Development of a fundamental skid resistance asphalt mix design procedure , 2005 .

[10]  R Sinhal,et al.  Review of UK skid resistance policy , 2004 .

[11]  Henrik Åström,et al.  FRICTION MEASUREMENT METHODS AND THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ROAD FRICTION AND TRAFFIC SAFETY. A LITERATURE REVIEW. , 2001 .

[12]  A N Hanna,et al.  AGGREGATE TESTS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENTS: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 2003 .

[13]  J. J. Henry,et al.  EVALUATION OF PAVEMENT FRICTION CHARACTERISTICS , 2000 .

[14]  R R Blackburn,et al.  EVALUATION OF PAVEMENT SURFACE TEXTURE: SIGNIFICANCE AND MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES. VOLUME II: COMPREHENSIVE REPORT. FINAL REPORT , 1984 .

[15]  Ulf Sandberg Influence of road surface texture on traffic characteristics related to environment, economy and safety : A state-of-the-art study regarding measures and measuring methods , 1998 .

[16]  R W Radlinski,et al.  NHTSA HEAVY DUTY VEHICLE BRAKE RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT NO. 1--STOPPING CAPABILITY OF AIR BRAKED VEHICLES VOLUME 2--APPENDICES , 1985 .

[17]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  Transverse pavement grooving against hydroplaning. II: Design , 2006 .

[18]  Douglas D. Gransberg,et al.  CHIP SEAL BEST PRACTICES , 2005 .

[19]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Evaluation of Circular Texture Meter for Measuring Surface Texture of Pavements , 2005 .

[20]  B. F. McCullough,et al.  SKID RESISTANCE GUIDELINES FOR SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS , 1966 .

[21]  Robert Y. Liang,et al.  POLISHING AND FRICTION CHARACTERISTICS OF AGGREGATES PRODUCED IN OHIO , 2000 .

[22]  T E Hoerner,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT: PAVEMENT TEXTURING AND TIRE-PAVEMENT NOISE , 2002 .

[23]  S Nesichi,et al.  Alleviating the Skid Resistance Problem - The Israeli Experience , 2005 .

[24]  P. Kandhal,et al.  AGGREGATE TESTS RELATED TO ASPHALT CONCRETE PERFORMANCE IN PAVEMENTS , 1998 .

[25]  B G Page,et al.  EVALUATION OF FRICTION REQUIREMENTS FOR CALIFORNIA STATE HIGHWAYS IN TERMS OF HIGHWAY GEOMETRICS. FINAL REPORT , 1986 .

[26]  Stephen N Runkle,et al.  PAVEMENT FRICTION NEEDS , 1972 .

[27]  Sira Vegas,et al.  State of the Practice , 2003 .

[28]  Rajib B. Mallick,et al.  AGGREGATE TESTS FOR HOT-MIX ASPHALT: STATE OF THE PRACTICE , 1997 .

[29]  J C Glennon Roadway Defects and Tort Liability , 1996 .

[30]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[31]  S H Dahir,et al.  ALTERNATIVES FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF AGGREGATE AND PAVEMENT PROPERTIES RELATED TO FRICTION AND WEAR RESISTANCE-EXECUTIVE SUMMARY , 1978 .

[32]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  Aggregate Properties and the Performance of Superpave-Designed Hot Mix Asphalt , 2005 .

[33]  Jay N. Meegoda,et al.  Correlation of Surface Texture, Segregation, and Measurement of Air Voids , 2002 .

[34]  Ralph Haas,et al.  Incorporating Road Safety into Pavement Management , 2000 .