Motivational active learning: engaging university students in computer science education

Attracting and engaging computer science students to enhance their mathematical and algorithmic thinking skills are challenging tasks. In winter 2013 we introduced a new teaching format for a course, which combines theory in computer science with hands-on algorithmic challenges, mathematical thinking activities, and collaborative problem-solving. Therefore, we introduced the pedagogical model Motivational Active Learning (MAL), which is grounded in MIT's successful format for teaching physics, Technology-Enabled Active Learning (TEAL), and combines it with motivational strategies usually used by game designers. Results from the initial setup in class reveals that students indeed assessed the course structure as more interactive and motivating compared to other similar courses. In this paper we discuss the course design, issues, and the impact, and analyze the first results in detail.

[1]  Mere Berryman,et al.  Scaling Up Education Reform , 2010 .

[2]  Patrick B. Kohl,et al.  Chronicling a successful secondary implementation of Studio Physics , 2012 .

[3]  Beth Simon,et al.  Retaining nearly one-third more majors with a trio of instructional best practices in CS1 , 2013, SIGCSE '13.

[4]  Roger A. Freedman.  Challenges in Teaching and Learning Introductory Physics , 1996 .

[5]  J. McGonigal.  Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World , 2011 .

[6]  John W. Belcher,et al.  How Much Have They Retained? Making Unseen Concepts Seen in a Freshman Electromagnetism Course at MIT , 2007 .

[7]  Lennart E. Nacke,et al.  Gamification : Toward a Definition , 2022 .

[8]  Jeffrey J. McConnell,et al.  Active learning and its use in computer science , 1996, ITiCSE.

[9]  Robert J. Beichner,et al.  Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project , 2003 .

[10]  Evelyne F. Vallières,et al.  The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education , 1992 .

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Comparison Of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, And Individualistic Learning , 1986 .

[12]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[13]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[14]  Marina Papastergiou,et al.  Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  J. Stuart,et al.  MEDICAL STUDENT CONCENTRATION DURING LECTURES , 1978, The Lancet.

[16]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy , 2000 .

[17]  樊希强,et al.  Cooperative Learning , 2020, Teaching High School Physics.