Performance During a 3-Hour Simulated Sentry Duty Task Under Varied Work Rates and Secondary Task Demands

The performance of 14 soldiers was evaluated during 3 hr of simulated sentry duty when (a) the primary work rate was varied and (b) participants were required to intermittently perform a simple secondary task. Performance measurements included latency to detect a target, number of correct target detections, correct friend versus foe identification, targets hit, and latency to respond to the presentation of a continuous tone (secondary task). Activity monitors measured motor activity during study participation. During higher work rate sessions, participants responded to the appearance of a target more quickly, discriminated friend from foe more accurately, and hit more foe targets. The addition of a simple auditory task to the primary task did not affect performance on any of the sentry duty measures. These findings demonstrated that moderate increases in task engagement, or work rate, improved most performance metrics on a long duration (3-hr), militarily relevant vigilance task.

[1]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[2]  D. Merullo,et al.  Effects of the Periodic Administration of Odor or Vibration on a 3-hr. Vigilance Task , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  N. Mackworth.  The Breakdown of Vigilance during Prolonged Visual Search 1 , 1948 .

[4]  Richard F. Johnson,et al.  Antihistamines and Sentry Duty: Effects of Terfenadine and Diphenhydramine on Target Detection and Rifle Markmanship , 1987 .

[5]  W. N. Dember,et al.  Psychophysical Determinants of Stress in Sustained Attention , 1993, Human factors.

[6]  D. Holding,et al.  Limitations of the Cognitive Vigilance Increment , 1987, Human factors.

[7]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Effects of Signal Salience and Caffeine on Performance, Workload, and Stress in an Abbreviated Vigilance Task , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[8]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  The Psychophysics of Vigilance , 1980 .

[9]  C D Wickens,et al.  Compatibility and Resource Competition between Modalities of Input, Central Processing, and Output , 1983, Human factors.

[10]  William N. Dember,et al.  VIGILANCE AND WORKLOAD IN AUTOMATED SYSTEMS. , 1996 .

[11]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Effects of knowledge of results and signal regularity on vigilance performance , 1974 .

[12]  Richard F. Johnson,et al.  Friend-Foe Discrimination, Caffeine, and Sentry Duty , 1999 .

[13]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[14]  Susan G. Hill,et al.  Workload Assessment of a Remotely Piloted Vehicle (RPV) System , 1988 .

[15]  C. Wickens,et al.  Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance. , 1993 .

[16]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[17]  Richard F. Johnson,et al.  Target Detection, Rifle Marksmanship, and Mood during Three Hours of Simulated Sentry Duty , 1989 .

[18]  J. Warm,et al.  Sustained Attention in the Mentally Retarded: The Vigilance Pradigm , 1985 .

[19]  Joel S. Warm,et al.  Influence of temporal uncertainty and sensory modality of signals on watchkeeping performance , 1971 .

[20]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[21]  Donna J. Merullo,et al.  Effects of Caffeine and Gender on Vigilance and Marksmanship , 1996 .

[22]  Mustapha Mouloua,et al.  Automation and Human Performance : Theory and Applications , 1996 .