FLOW-R, A MODEL FOR DEBRIS FLOW SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING AT A REGIONAL SCALE - SOME CASE STUDIES

Every year, debris flows cause huge damage in mountainous areas. Due to population pressure in hazardous zones, the socio-economic impact is much higher than in the past. Therefore, the devel- opment of indicative susceptibility hazard maps is of primary importance, particularly in developing countries. However, the complexity of the phenom- enon and the variability of local controlling factors limit the use of processbased models for a first as - sessment. A debris flow model has been developed for regional susceptibility assessments using digital elevation model (DEM) with a GIS-based approach.. The automatic identification of source areas and the estimation of debris flow spreading, based on GIS tools, provide a substantial basis for a preliminary susceptibility assessment at a regional scale. One of the main advantages of this model is its workability. In fact, everything is open to the user, from the data choice to the selection of the algorithms and their parameters. The Flow-R model was tested in three different contexts: two in Switzerland and one in Pa- kistan, for indicative susceptibility hazard mapping. It was shown that the quality of the DEM is the most important parameter to obtain reliable results for propagation, but also to identify the potential debris flows sources.

[1]  Andreas Kääb,et al.  Regional-scale GIS-models for assessment of hazards from glacier lake outbursts: evaluation and application in the Swiss Alps , 2003 .

[2]  C. Westen,et al.  Analysis of landslide inventories for accurate prediction of debris-flow source areas. , 2010 .

[3]  Claudio Margottini,et al.  Large scale debris-flow hazard assessment: a geotechnical approach and GIS modelling , 2003 .

[4]  Giuseppe Mandrone,et al.  The Influence of Hillslope Shape on Debris-Flow Initiation , 1997 .

[5]  Eric Bardou,et al.  Debris flow susceptibility mapping at a regional scale , 2008 .

[6]  D. Mcclung,et al.  A Two–Parameter Model of Snow–Avalanche Motion , 1980, Journal of Glaciology.

[7]  G. Heuvelink,et al.  DEM resolution effects on shallow landslide hazard and soil redistribution modelling , 2005 .

[8]  D. Tarboton A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[9]  Markus N. Zimmermann,et al.  The 1987 debris flows in Switzerland: documentation and analysis , 1993 .

[10]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[11]  M. Marthaler,et al.  Harmonisation et définition des unités lithostratigraphiques briançonnaises dans les nappes penniques du Valais , 2006 .

[12]  T. G. Freeman,et al.  Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid , 1991 .

[13]  J. Fairfield,et al.  Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models , 1991 .

[14]  Tamotsu Takahashi,et al.  ESTIMATION OF POTENTIAL DEBRIS FLOWS AND THEIR HAZARDOUS ZONES : SOFT COUNTERMEASURES FOR A DISASTER , 1981 .

[15]  T. Green,et al.  Comparison of grid‐based algorithms for computing upslope contributing area , 2006 .

[16]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[17]  P. Holmgren Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: An empirical evaluation , 1994 .