Cone beam CT for QA of synthetic CT in MRI only for prostate patients

Abstract Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐only radiotherapy is performed without computed tomography (CT). A synthetic CT (sCT) is used for treatment planning. The aim of this study was to develop a clinically feasible quality assurance (QA) procedure for sCT using the kV‐cone beam CT (CBCT), in an MRI‐only workflow for prostate cancer patients. Material and method Three criteria were addressed; stability in Hounsfield Units (HUs), deviations in HUs between the CT and CBCT, and validation of the QA procedure. For the two first criteria, weekly phantom measurements were performed. For the third criteria, sCT, CT, and CBCT for ten patients were used. Treatment plans were created based on the sCT (MriPlannerTM). CT and CBCT images were registered to the sCT. The treatment plan was copied to the CT and CBCT and recalculated. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) metrics were used to evaluate dosimetric differences between the sCT plan and the recalculated CT and CBCT plans. HU distributions in sCT, CT, and CBCT were compared. Well‐defined errors were introduced in the sCT for one patient to evaluate efficacy of the QA procedure. Results The kV‐CBCT system was stable in HU over time (standard deviation <40 HU). Variation in HUs between CT and CBCT was <60 HU. The differences between sCT–CT and sCT–CBCT dose distributions were below or equal to 1.0%. The highest mean dose difference for the CT and CBCT dose distribution was 0.6%. No statistically significant difference was found between total mean dose deviations from recalculated CT and CBCT plans, except for femoral head. Comparing HU distributions, the CBCT appeared to be similar to the CT. All introduced errors were identified by the proposed QA procedure, except all tissue compartments assigned as water. Conclusion The results in this study shows that CBCT can be used as a clinically feasible QA procedure for MRI‐only radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients.

[1]  T. Nyholm,et al.  A review of substitute CT generation for MRI-only radiation therapy , 2017, Radiation oncology.

[2]  اسماعیل اصلی,et al.  31 , 2012, Tao te Ching.

[3]  Jun Yu,et al.  Voxel-wise uncertainty in CT substitute derived from MRI. , 2012, Medical physics.

[4]  M. Frantzen-Steneker.  SP-0022: Routine QA of an MR-only workflow , 2015 .

[5]  Uwe Oelfke,et al.  Comparison of CT number calibration techniques for CBCT-based dose calculation , 2015, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[6]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Dosimetric feasibility of cone-beam CT-based treatment planning compared to CT-based treatment planning. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Peter R Seevinck,et al.  Quantification of confounding factors in MRI-based dose calculations as applied to prostate IMRT , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  R. Hoogeveen,et al.  MR-only simulation for radiotherapy planning , 2015 .

[9]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  MRI-guided prostate radiation therapy planning: Investigation of dosimetric accuracy of MRI-based dose planning. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Matthias Guckenberger,et al.  Investigation of the usability of conebeam CT data sets for dose calculation , 2008, Radiation oncology.

[11]  Fredrik Nordström,et al.  MR-OPERA: A Multicenter/Multivendor Validation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Only Prostate Treatment Planning Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  J. Edmund,et al.  A criterion for the reliable use of MRI-only radiotherapy , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[13]  Tiina Seppälä,et al.  A dual model HU conversion from MRI intensity values within and outside of bone segment for MRI-based radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer. , 2013, Medical physics.

[14]  Mary Feng,et al.  Investigation of a method for generating synthetic CT models from MRI scans of the head and neck for radiation therapy , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  H. Kjer,et al.  A voxel-based investigation for MRI-only radiotherapy of the brain using ultra short echo times , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Koen Van Leemput,et al.  Cone beam computed tomography guided treatment delivery and planning verification for magnetic resonance imaging only radiotherapy of the brain , 2015, Acta oncologica.

[17]  Olivier Salvado,et al.  An atlas-based electron density mapping method for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-alone treatment planning and adaptive MRI-based prostate radiation therapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Ahmed Meghzifene,et al.  Accuracy requirements and uncertainties in radiotherapy: a report of the International Atomic Energy Agency , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[19]  Friedlieb Lorenz,et al.  A new strategy for online adaptive prostate radiotherapy based on cone-beam CT. , 2009, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[20]  F. Verhaegen,et al.  Accuracy of dose calculations on kV cone beam CT images of lung cancer patients. , 2016, Medical physics.

[21]  Fredrik Nordström,et al.  Technical Note: MRI only prostate radiotherapy planning using the statistical decomposition algorithm. , 2015, Medical physics.

[22]  Ansgar Malich,et al.  Definition of the CTV Prostate in CT and MRI by Using CT–MRI Image Fusion in IMRT Planning for Prostate Cancer , 2011, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[23]  J. Edmund,et al.  Patch-based generation of a pseudo CT from conventional MRI sequences for MRI-only radiotherapy of the brain. , 2015, Medical physics.

[24]  S. Jolly,et al.  Assessment of dosimetric impact of system specific geometric distortion in an MRI only based radiotherapy workflow for prostate , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Tufve Nyholm,et al.  Systematisation of spatial uncertainties for comparison between a MR and a CT-based radiotherapy workflow for prostate treatments , 2009, Radiation oncology.