Process optimization under uncertainty when there is not enough process data at the operation stage

The main issues in the design and optimization of a chemical process under uncertainty are the feasibility test, flexibility index and the two-step optimization problem. The formulations of these problems are based on the implicit supposition that at the operation stage it is possible to correct all uncertain parameters in the chemical process models. However, in practice, one can improve the accuracy of only some of the uncertain parameters. As a result, we consider two groups of uncertain parameters. We postulate that one can significantly improve the accuracy of the first group of uncertain parameters using process data at the operation stage. This necessitates the formulation of a new feasibility test and the associated two-stage optimization problem. We consider the general case when both groups of uncertain parameters may or may not be statistically dependent. We propose methods of solving the problems based on the supposition that the parametric uncertainty region is small. Under this condition, the process models are well represented by linearized models whose accuracy is asymptotically equal to that of the original process models. This leads to substantial computational savings. Computational tests show that when it is not possible to improve the accuracy of some of the uncertain parameters, using standard flexibility analysis can lead to processes that are not flexible.

[1]  E. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Novel approach for optimal process design under uncertainty , 1995 .

[2]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  New strategies for flexibility analysis and design under uncertainty , 2000 .

[3]  George Stephanopoulos,et al.  Synthesis of operating procedures for complete chemical plants—II. A nonlinear planning methodology , 1988 .

[4]  G. M. Ostrovsky,et al.  An approach to solving a two-stage optimization problem under uncertainty , 1997 .

[5]  H. S. Fogler,et al.  Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1986 .

[6]  Paul I. Barton,et al.  Computer aided identification of chemical reaction hazards , 1997 .

[7]  Fernando P. Bernardo,et al.  Integration and Computational Issues in Stochastic Design and Planning Optimization Problems , 1999 .

[8]  Rembert Reemtsen,et al.  Numerical Methods for Semi-Infinite Programming: A Survey , 1998 .

[9]  Luke E. K. Achenie,et al.  Flexibility Analysis of Chemical Processes: Selected Global Optimization Sub-Problems , 2002 .

[10]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Stochastic programming in process synthesis: A two-stage model with MINLP recourse for multiperiod heat-integrated distillation sequences , 1992 .

[11]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Optimal process design with model parameter uncertainty and process variability , 2003 .

[12]  Luke E. K. Achenie,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AT BOTH DESIGN AND OPERATION STAGES , 2004 .

[13]  Philip M. Morse,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Games , 1952 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Optimal process design under uncertainty , 1983 .

[15]  Efstratios N. Pistikopoulos,et al.  Optimal retrofit design for improving process flexibility in nonlinear systems—II. Optimal level of flexibility , 1989 .

[16]  G. M. Ostrovsky,et al.  Flexibility analysis and optimization of chemical plants with uncertain parameters , 1994 .

[17]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Design optimization of stochastic flexibility , 1993 .

[18]  John D. Perkins,et al.  Operability and Control in Process Synthesis and Design , 1996 .

[19]  C. Floudas,et al.  Active constraint strategy for flexibility analysis in chemical processes , 1987 .

[20]  H. A. Luther,et al.  Applied numerical methods , 1969 .

[21]  J. A. Bandoni,et al.  Effect of disturbances in optimizing control: Steady‐state open‐loop backoff problem , 1996 .

[22]  Kenneth O. Kortanek,et al.  Semi-Infinite Programming: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1993, SIAM Rev..