Small Group Processes on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning

Today, information and communication technologies (ICTs) are often applied to assist learning processes. Peculiar objectives of ICT use in this topic are to facilitate collaboration and to increase learning through sharing and distributing knowledge. This study aimed to investigate the effects that a small group has on the individual and collaborative learning. A virtual environment was used to study the dynamics of social behaviors in collaborative and non-collaborative experimental conditions. Our results seem to support the hypothesis that social scripts are started, even when people are in non-interactive situations, and this is shown in virtual environments, too. Such outcomes, and the virtual interactions content analysis may suggest useful advices about collective reasoning and e-learning dynamics, which are very relevant topics in the study of web communities and educational communities.

[1]  B. Basden,et al.  A comparison of group and individual remembering: does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Fred Paas,et al.  Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect , 2011 .

[3]  Arne Weigold,et al.  False memory for associated word lists in individuals and collaborating groups , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Franco Bagnoli,et al.  Cognitive Network Structure: an Experimental Study , 2012, Adv. Complex Syst..

[5]  Bob Campbell,et al.  Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching , 2010 .

[6]  Celia B. Harris,et al.  Consensus Collaboration Enhances Group and Individual Recall Accuracy , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Fleur Ruth Prinsen,et al.  The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a CSCL environment , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Ning Ding,et al.  Group composition and its effect on female and male problem-solving in science education , 2008 .

[9]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perceptions and experiences of, and outcomes for, university students in culturally diversified dyads in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  J. Elizabeth Richey,et al.  When Is It Better to Learn Together? Insights from Research on Collaborative Learning , 2015 .

[11]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  K. McDermott,et al.  Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. , 1995 .

[14]  Na Liu,et al.  Joint effects of Gender Composition, Anonymity in Communication and Task Type on Collaborative Learning , 2007, PACIS.

[15]  Justyna Olszewska,et al.  Encoding strategy affects false recall and recognition: Evidence from categorical study material , 2013, Advances in cognitive psychology.

[16]  Rolf Rossaint,et al.  Resuscitation training in small-group setting – gender matters , 2013, Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.

[17]  G. Midgley,et al.  Systemic intervention for computer-supported collaborative learning , 2015 .

[18]  Egbert G. Harskamp,et al.  Exploring gender and gender pairing in the knowledge elaboration processes of students using computer-supported collaborative learning , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Raquel Benbunan-Fich,et al.  The importance of participant interaction in online environments , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  Celia B. Harris,et al.  Collaborative recall and collective memory: What happens when we remember together? , 2008, Memory.

[21]  Craig Thorley,et al.  Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure , 2007 .

[22]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[23]  A. Economides,et al.  Gender and Diversity in Collaborative Virtual Teams , 2008 .

[24]  Michelle L Meade,et al.  The effect of information distribution on collaborative inhibition , 2011, Memory.

[25]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Cognitive network dynamics in chatlines , 2010, ICCS.

[26]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Zehui Zhan,et al.  Effects of gender grouping on students' group performance, individual achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..