Product Line Design for Consumer Durables: An Integrated Marketing and Engineering Approach

Product line design for consumer durables often relies on close coordination between marketing and engineering domains. Product lines that evolve as optimal from marketers’ perspective may not be optimal from an engineering viewpoint, and vice versa. Although extant research has proposed sophisticated techniques to handle problems that characterize each individual domain, the majority of these developments have not addressed the interdependent issues across marketing and engineering. The author presents a product line optimization method that enables managers to simultaneously consider factors deemed important from both marketing and engineering domains. One major advantage of this method is that it takes into account the strategic reactions from the incumbent manufacturers and the retailer in the design of the product line. The author demonstrates in a simulation study that this method is applicable to problems with a reasonably large scale. Using data collected in a power tool development project undertaken by a major U.S. manufacturer, the study illustrates that the proposed method leads to a more profitable product line than alternative approaches that consider requirements from these two domains separately.

[1]  V. Rao,et al.  Research for product positioning and design decisions: An integrative review , 1995 .

[2]  CONJOINT DESIGN,et al.  The Strategic Importance of Accuracy in Conjoint Design 1. Strategic Implications of Accuracy in Conjoint Analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  An Integrated Robust Design and Marketing Approach for Product Design Selection Process , 2004, DAC 2004.

[4]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  An investigation of mating and population maintenance strategies in hybrid genetic heuristics for product line designs , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[5]  Gregory Dobson,et al.  Positioning and Pricing a Product Line , 1988 .

[6]  J. Hauser Note---Competitive Price and Positioning Strategies , 1988 .

[7]  Kamalini Ramdas,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: A Cross-Functional Approach to Evaluating Multiple Line Extensions for Assembled Products , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Hui Li,et al.  An Approach for Product Line Design Selection under Uncertainty and Competition , 2002 .

[9]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Practice Prize Winner - Pricing Digital Content Product Lines: A Model and Application for the National Academies Press , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[10]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Designer-moderated product design , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[11]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Principles of Optimal Design: Modeling and Computation , 1988 .

[12]  Rahul Rai,et al.  Agent-based optimization for product family design , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[13]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization , 2003 .

[14]  J. Quiggin A theory of anticipated utility , 1982 .

[15]  P. Lenk,et al.  Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental Designs , 1996 .

[16]  A Gerodimos,et al.  Robust Discrete Optimization and its Applications , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Multi-Objective Single Product Robust Optimization: An Integrated Design and Marketing Approach , 2006 .

[18]  R. Gupta,et al.  Development of hybrid genetic algorithms for product line designs , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[19]  P. Green,et al.  On Bayesian Analysis of Mixtures with an Unknown Number of Components (with discussion) , 1997 .

[20]  Fred M. Feinberg,et al.  Capturing Flexible Heterogeneous Utility Curves: A Bayesian Spline Approach , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[22]  S. Kullback,et al.  Tests for Contingency Tables and Marltov Chains , 1962 .

[23]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Improving cost effectiveness in an existing product line using component product platforms1 , 2010 .

[24]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Statistics and Marketing , 2005 .

[25]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Balancing Marketing and Manufacturing Objectives in Product Line Design , 2006 .

[26]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples , 1991 .

[27]  Brett R. Gordon A Dynamic Model of Consumer Replacement Cycles in the PC Processor Industry , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[28]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Defensive Marketing Strategies , 2008, Mark. Sci..

[29]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Enhancing Marketing with Engineering: Optimal Product Line Design for Heterogeneous Markets , 2011 .

[30]  R. Verma,et al.  Using conjoint analysis to help design product platforms , 1999 .

[31]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Product Line Design with Component Commonality and Cost-Reduction Effort , 2006, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[32]  J. Hauser,et al.  The House of Quality , 1988 .

[33]  Robert M. Freund,et al.  Optimizing Product Line Designs: Efficient Methods and Comparisons , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Gerald Shea Risk Assessment and Decision Making in Business and Industry: A Practical Guide , 2000, Technometrics.

[35]  J. Schafer,et al.  Difficulties in Drawing Inferences With Finite-Mixture Models , 2004 .

[36]  J. Matos,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of structural systems by perturbation techniques , 2008 .

[37]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  Balancing Commonality and Performance within the Concurrent Design of Multiple Products in a Product Family , 2001, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[38]  Robert Kohn,et al.  Dissecting the Random Component of Utility , 2002 .

[39]  Harald Hruschka,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Product Design: How Well do They Really Work? , 2003 .

[40]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Marketing models of consumer heterogeneity , 1998 .

[41]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[42]  Ernest O. Doebelin System Dynamics: Modeling, Analysis, Simulation, Design , 1998 .

[43]  Claus-Dieter Volko Robust Discrete Optimization , 2012 .

[44]  Patrick R. McMullen,et al.  A pruning heuristic for use with multisource product design , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[46]  Brad Wardman,et al.  Voice of the customer , 2013, 2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit.

[47]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Comparison of Commonality Indices for Product Family Design , 2004, DAC 2004.

[48]  Michel Wedel,et al.  Bayesian Prediction in Hybrid Conjoint Analysis , 2002 .

[49]  Deepak Kumar,et al.  A Market-Driven Approach to the Design of Platform-Based Product Families , 2006 .

[50]  Tharam S. Dillon,et al.  Integrated Product Design , 2012 .

[51]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Models and Heuristics for Product Line Selection , 1985 .

[52]  Varghese S. Jacob,et al.  Genetic Algorithms for Product Design , 1996 .

[53]  R. Kohli,et al.  Heuristics for Product-Line Design Using Conjoint Analysis , 1990 .

[54]  Susan Carlson Skalak House of Quality , 2002 .

[55]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Linking Marketing and Engineering Product Design Decisions via Analytical Target Cascading , 2005 .

[56]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Incorporating Subjective Characteristics in Product Design and Evaluations , 2007 .

[57]  J. Jiao,et al.  Product portfolio planning with customer-engineering interaction , 2005 .

[58]  Ward Hanson,et al.  Optimizing Multinomial Logit Profit Functions , 1996 .

[59]  G. Dobson,et al.  Heuristics for pricing and positioning a product-line using conjoint and cost data , 1993 .

[60]  C. Robert,et al.  Estimation of Finite Mixture Distributions Through Bayesian Sampling , 1994 .

[61]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Estimating Population Characteristics From Sparse Matrix Samples of Item Responses , 1992 .

[62]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A market-driven approach to product family design , 2009 .

[63]  David W. Beach,et al.  Integrated Product Design for Marketability and Manufacturing , 1997 .

[64]  H. Li,et al.  Product Design Selection Under Uncertainty and With Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[65]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Improving Cost Effectiveness in an Existing Product Line Using Component Product Platforms , 2008, DAC 2008.

[66]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A comprehensive robust design approach for decision trade-offs in complex systems design , 2001 .

[67]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design to improve commonality in custom products , 2003, J. Intell. Manuf..

[68]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Near optimal solutions for product line design and selection: beam search heuristics , 1995 .

[69]  Fred S. Zufryden,et al.  An Integer Programming Approach to the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem , 1988 .

[70]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian Data Analysis , 2010 .

[71]  Leslie O. Morgan,et al.  Marketing/Manufacturing Trade-Offs in Product Line Management , 2001 .

[72]  Warren H. Hausman,et al.  Technical Note: Mathematical Properties of the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.: Mathematical Properties of the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis. , 2000 .

[73]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  Design of Robust New Products Under Variability: Marketing Meets Design , 2005 .

[74]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[75]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization , 2003, DAC 2002.

[76]  Shapour Azarm,et al.  A Feasibility Robust Optimization Method Using Sensitivity Region Concept , 2005 .

[77]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  New Product Development Under Channel Acceptance , 2007 .