Assessing Multidimensional Sustainability of European Countries with a Novel, Two-Stage DEA

The issues of sustainability and sustainable development are considered important aspects of governmental policy making. Currently, many methods are used to assess the sustainability of various regions and countries each accompanied by advantages and disadvantages. The objective of the current paper is to propose a new methodological framework for the assessment of sustainability that attempts to mitigate some of the limitations of the methods that are used. The proposed method is based on two-stage Data Envelopment analysis. In the first stage, raw data are transformed to sub-indicators using the multiplicative version of the VRS DEA model. The sub-indicators are used in the second-stage, in a typical Benefit-of-the-Doubt model, to calculate their optimal weights, which are used in the construction of a geometric composite indicator of sustainability. The method is tested to calculate a sustainability index for 28 European countries. The results show that eastern European and Scandinavian countries appear to be more sustainable than western, developed countries.

[1]  Eugenia Nissi,et al.  Monitoring environmental efficiency: An application to Italian provinces , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Jia He,et al.  An integrated data envelopment analysis and emergy-based ecological footprint methodology in evaluating sustainable development, a case study of Jiangsu Province, China , 2016 .

[3]  G. Debreu The Coefficient of Resource Utilization , 1951 .

[4]  Matthias Klumpp,et al.  Do Forwarders Improve Sustainability Efficiency? Evidence from a European DEA Malmquist Index Calculation , 2017 .

[5]  Walter Diewert,et al.  Functional forms for profit and transformation functions , 1973 .

[6]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[7]  Yi Yang,et al.  Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the theory and application of data envelopment analysis , 2001 .

[9]  John Robinson Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development , 2004 .

[10]  M. Farrell The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[11]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[12]  Tom Van Puyenbroeck,et al.  Geometric mean quantity index numbers with Benefit-of-the-Doubt weights , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Methodological Considerations on Regional Sustainability Assessment Based on Multicriteria and Sensitivity Analysis , 2011 .

[14]  R. Howarth,et al.  Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world , 2006 .

[15]  Matthew D. Adler Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2011 .

[16]  F. Førsund,et al.  On the Origins of Data Envelopment Analysis , 2000 .

[17]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  Towards indicators of sustainable development for firms: A productive efficiency perspective , 1999 .

[18]  Union européenne,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2008 .

[19]  D. Banister,et al.  Sustainable development: Our Common Future revisited , 2014 .

[20]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[21]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[22]  Nickolaos G. Tzeremes,et al.  Measuring Sustainability Efficiency Using a Two‐Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2016 .