Nursing home administrators' opinions of the nursing home compare web site.

PURPOSE In November of 2002 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publicly reported on a national basis the quality of nursing homes on the Nursing Home Compare (NHC) Web site. This study examines administrators' opinions of this initiative and whether it has fostered quality improvement. DESIGN AND METHODS Data used in this investigation come from a questionnaire mailed to the administrators of 477 nursing homes. Three hundred and twenty-four responses were received, giving a response rate of 68%. Facilities were located in four states: Connecticut, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee. RESULTS Ninety percent of the administrators examined the NHC Web site, 51% stated that they would be using the information for quality improvement in the future, and 33% stated that they were using NHC information in quality-improvement initiatives. IMPLICATIONS For NHC to influence quality as it is intended, nursing home quality-of-care initiatives are essential. Study results show that administrators are generally accepting of the NHC Web site, and some are using the information in quality initiatives.

[1]  V. Mor,et al.  Influence of Facility Characteristics on Use of Antipsychotic Medications in Nursing Homes , 2000, Medical care.

[2]  Matthew E. Fitzgerald,et al.  Approaches to quality improvement in nursing homes: Lessons learned from the six-state pilot of CMS's Nursing Home Quality Initiative , 2003, BMC geriatrics.

[3]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Knowledge dissemination and utilization in gerontology: an organizing framework. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[4]  D. Longo,et al.  Consumer reports in health care. Do they make a difference in patient care? , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  P. Mahoney,et al.  Choosing a health plan: what information will consumers use? , 1997, Health affairs.

[6]  J. Thomas.  Report cards--useful to whom and for what? , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[7]  N. Castle,et al.  Report cards and nursing homes. , 2005, The Gerontologist.

[8]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Self-management training for improving job performance: a field experiment involving salespeople. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  M. Stuart,et al.  Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions , 2003, BMC geriatrics.

[10]  A. Bindman,et al.  Health Care Report Cards: Implications for Vulnerable Patient Groups and the Organizations Providing Them Care , 2002, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[11]  T. Prohaska,et al.  Challenges and opportunities in recruiting and retaining underrepresented populations into health promotion research. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[12]  M. Marshall.  Accountability and quality improvement: the role of report cards , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[13]  Vincent Mor,et al.  The quality of quality measurement in U.S. nursing homes. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[14]  J. Sangl,et al.  Creating more effective health plan quality reports for consumers: lessons from a synthesis of qualitative testing. , 2001, Health services research.

[15]  R H Brook,et al.  The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence. , 2000, JAMA.

[16]  A. Mushlin,et al.  Quality of care information makes a difference: an analysis of market share and price changes after publication of the New York State Cardiac Surgery Mortality Reports. , 1998, Medical care.

[17]  John Engberg,et al.  Response formats and satisfaction surveys for elders. , 2004, The Gerontologist.

[18]  D. Pryor,et al.  Assessment of coronary artery bypass graft surgery performance in New York. Is there a bias against taking high-risk patients? , 1997, Medical care.

[19]  A. Mushlin,et al.  The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: a midcourse evaluation. , 2001, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[20]  J. Fyock,et al.  Reporting of CAHPS quality information to medicare beneficiaries. , 2001, Health services research.

[21]  J. Letwat.  The Current Quality of Health Plan Report Cards , 1999, Journal of Medical Systems.

[22]  W. Spector,et al.  Quality report cards and nursing home quality. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[23]  A. Fendrick,et al.  Health plan report cards: exploring differences in plan ratings. , 1998, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[24]  M. Morrisey,et al.  Death and reputation: how consumers acted upon HCFA mortality information. , 1997, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.

[25]  J. Schnelle,et al.  Designing a report card for nursing facilities: what information is needed and why. , 2003, The Gerontologist.

[26]  D. Zimmerman.  Improving nursing home quality of care through outcomes data: the MDS quality indicators , 2003, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[27]  S. Robinson,et al.  Understanding the quality challenge for health consumers: the Kaiser/AHCPR Survey. , 1997, The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement.

[28]  J. Schnelle,et al.  Federal and State Nursing Facility Websites: Just What the Consumer Needs? , 2003, American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality.