Applying the COM-B Model to Assess the Usability of Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults with Hearing Loss

BACKGROUND Unlike conventional hearing aids, smartphone-connected listening devices may require limited or no input from a trained audiologist in terms of device programming and adjustment. However, there is a lack of peer-reviewed evidence assessing the real-world perspectives of people living with hearing loss toward such technological innovations. PURPOSE This study assessed the everyday experiences of adults living with hearing loss toward a range of smartphone-connected listening devices using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model as a theoretical framework. RESEARCH DESIGN A qualitative study where participants trialed one of the following smartphone-connected listening devices for two weeks in their everyday lives: made-for-smartphone hearing aid, personal sound amplification product, and smartphone "hearing aid" app with wired earphones or wireless hearable. Individual semistructured interviews were conducted. STUDY SAMPLE Twenty adults (13 male and 7 female; mean age = 62.25 years, SD = 11.59) with mild-to-moderate hearing loss (mean better ear pure-tone average = 30.49 dB HL, SD = 17.51) were recruited using a convenience sampling strategy. All participants owned conventional hearing aids. DATA ANALYSIS The data were analyzed using an established deductive thematic analysis procedure within the context of the COM-B model. The model stipulates that for individuals to engage in a particular behavior (B), they must have sufficient capability (C), opportunity (O), and motivation (M). RESULTS Capability: One of the key advantages facilitating use and adherence of smartphone-connected listening devices was the ability for participants to make fine-tune adjustments in any listening situation. Opportunity: Participants commented that these devices could address issues surrounding stigma as smartphones are ubiquitous in everyday life. Motivation: Participants consistently reported that the ability to make adjustments via a smartphone provided them with a greater sense of autonomy and empowerment. As a result, they felt more in control of their hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS This study lays the foundation for further high-quality research to explore whether smartphone-connected technologies have the potential to yield optimum benefits for people living with hearing loss.

[1]  Helen Henshaw,et al.  Application of health behaviour theory to hearing healthcare research: The state of play and beyond , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[2]  Melissa A. Papesh,et al.  Application of the health belief model: Development of the hearing beliefs questionnaire (HBQ) and its associations with hearing health behaviors , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Intention to use hearing aids: a survey based on the theory of planned behavior , 2014, Patient preference and adherence.

[4]  G. Andersson,et al.  Internet Access and Use in Adults With Hearing Loss , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Robert West,et al.  The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide To Designing Interventions , 2014 .

[6]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Applying the COM-B behaviour model and behaviour change wheel to develop an intervention to improve hearing-aid use in adult auditory rehabilitation , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[7]  Paul Mitchell,et al.  Incidence and predictors of hearing aid use and ownership among older adults with hearing loss. , 2011, Annals of epidemiology.

[8]  S. Michie,et al.  The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions , 2011, Implementation science : IS.

[9]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology , 2007 .

[10]  N. Coulson,et al.  Applying theories of health behaviour and change to hearing health research: Time for a new approach , 2016, International journal of audiology.

[11]  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[12]  M. Wallhagen,et al.  The stigma of hearing loss. , 2010, The Gerontologist.

[13]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The preferred response slopes and two-channel compression ratios in twenty listening conditions by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners and their relationship to the acoustic input , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[14]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[15]  I. Rosenstock Why people use health services. , 1966, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly.

[16]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[17]  Larry E. Humes,et al.  The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial , 2017, American journal of audiology.

[18]  L. Hickson,et al.  Do Hearing Aids Address Real-World Hearing Difficulties for Adults With Mild Hearing Impairment? Results From a Pilot Study Using Ecological Momentary Assessment , 2018, Trends in hearing.

[20]  P. Kitterick,et al.  Hearing aids for mild to moderate hearing loss in adults. , 2017, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[21]  D. Maidment,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the effectiveness of alternative listening devices to conventional hearing aids in adults with hearing loss , 2018, International journal of audiology.

[22]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[23]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Computer Skills and Internet Use in Adults Aged 50-74 Years: Influence of Hearing Difficulties , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  S. Michie,et al.  Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research , 2012, Implementation Science.

[25]  Heather Fortnum,et al.  Why do people fitted with hearing aids not wear them? , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[26]  Jason Galster,et al.  A Qualitative Case Study of Smartphone‐Connected Hearing Aids: Influences on Patients, Clinicians, and Patient‐Clinician Interactions , 2017, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[27]  Amyn M Amlani,et al.  Utility of Smartphone-based Hearing Aid Applications as a Substitute to Traditional Hearing Aids , 2022 .

[28]  Gitte Keidser,et al.  The trainable hearing aid: What will it do for clients and clinicians? , 2006 .

[29]  D. Blazer,et al.  Priorities for Improving Hearing Health Care for Adults: A Report From the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. , 2016, JAMA.

[30]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. , 1983, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[31]  F. Lin,et al.  Prevalence of hearing aid use among older adults in the United States. , 2012, Archives of internal medicine.

[32]  D. Stephens,et al.  Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. , 2007, Health technology assessment.

[33]  L. Worrall,et al.  Stages of Change in Adults With Acquired Hearing Impairment Seeking Help for the First Time: Application of the Transtheoretical Model in Audiologic Rehabilitation , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[34]  Knowledge Is Power: Improving Outcomes for Patients, Partners, and Professionals in the Digital Age , 2019, Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups.

[35]  I. M. Ventry,et al.  The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a New Tool , 1982, Ear and hearing.

[36]  F. Lin,et al.  The effects of hearing impairment in older adults on communication partners: a systematic review. , 2015, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[37]  J. Betz,et al.  Personal Sound Amplification Products vs a Conventional Hearing Aid for Speech Understanding in Noise , 2017, JAMA.

[38]  D. Hall,et al.  A Data-Driven Synthesis of Research Evidence for Domains of Hearing Loss, as Reported by Adults With Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners , 2017, Trends in hearing.

[39]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[40]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems , 2017, Implementation Science.

[41]  Jingjing Xu,et al.  Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients’ Perspective , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[42]  Pilot Electroacoustic Analyses of a Sample of Direct-to-Consumer Amplification Products. , 2017, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[43]  M. Ferguson,et al.  Coping together with hearing loss: a qualitative meta-synthesis of the psychosocial experiences of people with hearing loss and their communication partners , 2017, International journal of audiology.

[44]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  R M Cox,et al.  Comparison of objective and subjective measures of speech intelligibility in elderly hearing-impaired listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[46]  J. Gagné,et al.  Stigma: A negative and a positive influence on help-seeking for adults with acquired hearing loss , 2010, International journal of audiology.