Experimental Factors Related to Aptitude-Treatment Interactions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Walberg. A Model for Research on Instruction , 1970, The School Review.
[2] H. Marshall. Learning as a Function of Task Interest, Reinforcement, and Social Class Variables. , 1969 .
[3] M. Glock,et al. Learner characteristics and instructional mode: a search for disordinal interactions. , 1969, Journal of educational psychology.
[4] Wayne L. Herman,et al. The Relationship of Teacher-Centered Activities and Pupil-Centered Activities to Pupil Achievement and Interest in 18 Fifth-Grade Social Studies Classes1 , 1969 .
[5] Jeff A. Pyatte. Some Effects of Unit Structure on Achievement and Transfer1 , 1969 .
[6] M. L. Koran. The Effects of Individual Differences on Observational Learning in the Acquisition of a Teaching Skill. , 1969 .
[7] E. Lemke. Effects of Degree of Initial Acquisition, Group Size, and General Mental Ability on Concept Learning and Transfer. , 1969 .
[8] G. Nuthall. An Experimental Comparison of Alternative Strategies for Teaching Concepts1 , 1968 .
[9] M. Showel. DEVELOPMENT OF TWO AUTOMATED PROGRAMS FOR TEACHING MILITARY JUSTICE TO MEN OF VARIOUS APTITUDE LEVELS. , 1968 .
[10] P. Campeau. Test anxiety and feedback in programmed instruction. , 1968, Journal of Educational Psychology.
[11] Certain effects of the expectation to transmit on concept attainment. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.
[12] G. Kasten Tallmadge,et al. Study of Training Equipment and Individual Differences: The Effects of Subject Matter Variables. Report and Supplementary Report. , 1968 .
[13] A Study and Comparison of Experimenter Pacing and Student Pacing of Programed Instruction , 1968 .
[14] J. Rapier. Learning abilities of normal and retarded children as a function of social class. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.
[15] J. Shaver,et al. The Effect of Student Characteristic-Teaching Method Interactions on Learning to Think Critically. , 1968 .
[16] D. M. Cook,et al. Effect of Three Methods of Instruction upon the Handwriting Performance of Third and Fourth Graders1 , 1968 .
[17] A. Jensen,et al. Social Class, Race, and Genetics: Implications for Education1 , 1968 .
[18] Relationships between training methods and learner characteristics. , 1968, Journal of educational psychology.
[19] S. Samuels,et al. Attentional process in reading: the effect of pictures on the acquisition of reading responses. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.
[20] Acquisition and retention of discrimination learning sets in lower-class preschool children. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.
[21] C. Stern. Acquisition of problem-solving strategies in young children and its relation to verbalization. , 1967, Journal of educational psychology.
[22] N. Gage,et al. Theoretical Formulations for Research on Teaching , 1967 .
[23] P. Buckland. THE RESPONSE IN A LINEAR PROGRAM: ITS MODE AND IMPORTANCE , 1967 .
[24] E. Keislar,et al. Acquisition of Problem Solving Strategies by Young Children, And Its Relation to Mental Age , 1967 .
[25] R. Karraker. Knowledge of results and incorrect recall of plausible multiple-choice alternatives. , 1967 .
[26] Gerard C. Kress,et al. A Comparison of Two Strategies for Individualizing Fixed-Paced Programed Instruction1 , 1966 .
[27] Lawrence M. Stolurow,et al. Hierarchical Preview VS Problem Oriented Review in Learning an Imaginary Science1 , 1966 .
[28] W. F. White,et al. Generalized effects of praise and reproof. , 1966, Journal of educational psychology.
[29] A. Lott,et al. Group cohesiveness and individual learning. , 1966, Journal of educational psychology.
[30] R. Traub. Importance of problem heterogeneity to programed instruction. , 1966 .
[31] R. Gagne. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING FROM VISUAL AND VERBAL PRESENTATIONS AND THE USE OF VISUAL EXAMPLES IN REVIEW. , 1965 .
[32] R. A. Rosemier. Effectiveness of forewarning about errors in response-selective learning. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.
[33] S. Lublin,et al. Reinforcement schedules, scholastic aptitude, autonomy need, and achievement in a programed course. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.
[34] W F Seibert,et al. Individual differences and instructional film effects. , 1965, Journal of Educational Psychology.
[35] K. Hopkins,et al. An Empirical Comparison of Pupil Achievement and Other Variables in Graded and Ungraded Classes , 1965 .
[36] J. Krumboltz,et al. The Comparative Effects of Inductive and Deductive Sequences in Programed Instruction* , 1965 .
[37] J. Hartley. Linear and skip-branching programmes: a comparison study. , 1965, The British journal of educational psychology.
[38] J. Sassenrath,et al. Effects of differential feedback from examinations on retention and transfer. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.
[39] J P WILLIAMS,et al. EFFECTIVENESS OF CONSTRUCTED-RESPONSE AND MULTIPLE-CHOICE PROGRAMING MODES AS A FUNCTION OF TEST MODE. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.
[40] LEARNING BY PROGRAMED AND TEXT FORMAT AT THREE LEVELS OF DIFFICULTY. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.
[41] L. Siegel,et al. EDUCATIONAL SET: A DETERMINANT OF ACQUISITION. , 1965, Journal of educational psychology.
[42] W. Bush,et al. Some interactions between individual differences and modes of instruction. AMRL-TR-65-228. , 1965, AMRL-TR. Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories.
[43] K. Orton,et al. The Effect of Method of Instruction on Retention and Transfer for Different Levels of Ability , 1964, The School Review.
[44] Milton Budoff,et al. Reading progress as related to efficiency of visual and aural learning in the primary grades. , 1964 .
[45] Richard F. Potthoff,et al. On the Johnson-Neyman technique and some extensions thereof , 1964 .
[46] W. H. Ashbaugh. Effect on Achievement of Written Responses to Programmed Learning Material for Students of Differing Academic Ability , 1964 .
[47] Hani Van de Riet. Effects of praise and reproof on paired-associate learning in educationally retarded children. , 1964 .
[48] W. H. Lucow. An Experiment with the Cuisenaire Method in Grade Three , 1964 .
[49] R. S. Barrett,et al. Comparison of programed and conventional instruction methods. , 1964 .
[50] Robert E. Davidson,et al. Mediation and ability in paired-associate learning. , 1964 .
[51] Set to Learn and Proactive Inhibition , 1963 .
[52] H. G. Osburn,et al. Prediction of Proficiency in a Modern and Traditional Course in Beginning Algebra , 1963 .
[53] Bypassing as a way of adapting self-instruction programs to individual differences. , 1963 .
[54] M. Wittrock. Response mode in the programing of kinetic molecular theory concepts. , 1963 .
[55] Richard F. Potthoff,et al. On the Johnson-:neyman Technique and Some Extensions Thereof , 1963 .
[56] Harry Silberman. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SELF-INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR UNDERACHIEVING AND OVERACHIEVING STUDENTS. , 1962 .
[57] Donald M. Miller,et al. Experimental Folklore and Experimentation: The Study of Programmed Learning in the Wauwatosa Public Schools* , 1962 .
[58] J. Hayman,et al. An Experiment Involving Use of English 2600, An Automated Instruction Text , 1962 .
[59] A Comparison of Three Modes of Presenting A Programmed Instruction Sequence , 1962 .
[60] S. Osler,et al. Concept attainment: II. Effect of stimulus complexity upon concept attainment at two levels of intelligence. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.
[61] Willis E. Ray. Pupil Discovery vs. Direct Instruction , 1961 .
[62] A. Lubin. The Interpretation of Significant Interaction , 1961 .
[63] Carleton B. Shap. Relationship of intelligence to step size on a teaching machine program. , 1961 .
[64] Edmund Amidon,et al. The effects of direct and indirect teacher influence on dependent-prone students learning geometry. , 1961 .
[65] J. N. Jacobs,et al. An experimental study in teaching high school biology by television in the Cincinnati public schools , 1959 .
[66] Palmer O. Johnson,et al. Modern statistical methods : descriptive and inductive , 1959 .
[67] J. N. Jacobs,et al. An Experimental Study of the Effectiveness of Television Versus Classroom Instruction in Sixth Grade Science in the Cincinnati Public Schools, 1956-1957 , 1959 .
[68] L. Cronbach. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .
[69] A. Calvin,et al. The Effect of Intelligence and Social Atmosphere on Group Problem Solving Behavior , 1957 .
[70] W. Reitman,et al. Performance as a function of motive strength and expectancy of goal-attainment. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[71] John N. Ward. Group-Study Versus Lecture-Demonstration Method in Physical Science Instruction for General Education College Students , 1956 .
[72] R. E. Mills. An Evaluation of Techniques for Teaching Word Recognition , 1956, The Elementary School Journal.
[73] Donald E. Smith,et al. Reading improvement as a function of student personality and teaching method. , 1956 .
[74] R. Abelson. A note on the Neyman-Johnson technique , 1953 .
[75] L. Wispé. Evaluating Section Teaching Methods in the Introductory Course , 1951 .
[76] A. A. Lumsdaine,et al. Experiments On Mass Communication , 1949 .
[77] G. Thompson,et al. The effect of repeated praise or blame on the work achievement of 'introverts' and 'extroverts.' , 1944 .
[78] J. Neyman,et al. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. , 1936 .
[79] John B. Carroll Donald Spearritt. Monograph Number 4 A STUDY OF A " MODEL OF SCHOOL LEARNING " , 2022 .