Visualization of phage DNA degradation by a type I CRISPR-Cas system at the single-cell level

BackgroundThe CRISPR-Cas system is a widespread prokaryotic defense system which targets and cleaves invasive nucleic acids, such as plasmids or viruses. So far, a great number of studies have focused on the components and mechanisms of this system, however, a direct visualization of CRISPR-Cas degrading invading DNA in real-time has not yet been studied at the single-cell level.MethodsIn this study, we fluorescently label phage lambda DNA in vivo, and track the labeled DNA over time to characterize DNA degradation at the single-cell level.ResultsAt the bulk level, the lysogenization frequency of cells harboring CRISPR plasmids decreases significantly compared to cells with a non-CRISPR control. At the single-cell level, host cells with CRISPR activity are unperturbed by phage infection, maintaining normal growth like uninfected cells, where the efficiency of our anti-lambda CRISPR system is around 26%. During the course of time-lapse movies, the average fluorescence of invasive phage DNA in cells with CRISPR activity, decays more rapidly compared to cells without, and phage DNA is fully degraded by around 44 minutes on average. Moreover, the degradation appears to be independent of cell size or the phage DNA ejection site suggesting that Cas proteins are dispersed in sufficient quantities throughout the cell.ConclusionsWith the CRISPR-Cas visualization system we developed, we are able to examine and characterize how a CRISPR system degrades invading phage DNA at the single-cell level. This work provides direct evidence and improves the current understanding on how CRISPR breaks down invading DNA.

[1]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Small CRISPR RNAs Guide Antiviral Defense in Prokaryotes , 2008, Science.

[2]  Rodolphe Barrangou,et al.  Diversity of CRISPR-Cas immune systems and molecular machines , 2015, Genome Biology.

[3]  O. Sliusarenko,et al.  High‐throughput, subpixel precision analysis of bacterial morphogenesis and intracellular spatio‐temporal dynamics , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  J. Oost,et al.  Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR–Cas systems , 2014, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  M. Kessel,et al.  Bacteriophage infection is targeted to cellular poles. Commentary , 2008 .

[6]  Scott Bailey,et al.  In Vitro Reconstitution of an Escherichia coli RNA-guided Immune System Reveals Unidirectional, ATP-dependent Degradation of DNA Target* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Samuel H Sternberg,et al.  CasA mediates Cas3-catalyzed target degradation during CRISPR RNA-guided interference , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Rolf Wagner,et al.  Identification and characterization of E. coli CRISPR‐cas promoters and their silencing by H‐NS , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  I. Golding,et al.  Following Cell-fate in E. coli After Infection by Phage Lambda , 2011, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[10]  Ariel B. Lindner,et al.  Neurokinin 1 Receptor Antagonism as a Possible Therapy for Alcoholism , 2008, Science.

[11]  Jean Sippy,et al.  Decision Making at a Subcellular Level Determines the Outcome of Bacteriophage Infection , 2010, Cell.

[12]  Jon McGinn,et al.  CRISPR-Cas Systems Optimize Their Immune Response by Specifying the Site of Spacer Integration. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[13]  Marko Djordjevic,et al.  Transcription, processing and function of CRISPR cassettes in Escherichia coli , 2010, Molecular microbiology.

[14]  Rongguang Zhang,et al.  Structures of CRISPR Cas3 offer mechanistic insights into Cascade-activated DNA unwinding and degradation , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[15]  M. Kessel,et al.  Bacteriophage infection is targeted to cellular poles , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[16]  Rotem Sorek,et al.  CRISPR–Cas adaptation: insights into the mechanism of action , 2016, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[17]  Nancy Kleckner,et al.  SeqA: A negative modulator of replication initiation in E. coli , 1994, Cell.

[18]  E. Charpentier,et al.  Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas Systems. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[19]  K. Skarstad,et al.  E. coli SeqA protein binds oriC in two different methyl-modulated reactions appropriate to its roles in DNA replication initiation and origin sequestration , 1995, Cell.

[20]  Lanying Zeng,et al.  Phage DNA dynamics in cells with different fates. , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[21]  Philippe Horvath,et al.  Cas3 is a single‐stranded DNA nuclease and ATP‐dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[22]  U. Qimron,et al.  The Escherichia coli CRISPR System Protects from λ Lysogenization, Lysogens, and Prophage Induction , 2010, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  L. Marraffini,et al.  Mature clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats RNA (crRNA) length is measured by a ruler mechanism anchored at the precursor processing site , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  S. Mulepati,et al.  Crystal structure of a CRISPR RNA–guided surveillance complex bound to a ssDNA target , 2014, Science.

[25]  R. Barrangou,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. , 2011, Annual review of genetics.

[26]  H. Deveau,et al.  CRISPR/Cas system and its role in phage-bacteria interactions. , 2010, Annual review of microbiology.

[27]  Konstantin Severinov,et al.  CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[28]  J. Doudna,et al.  Surveillance and Processing of Foreign DNA by the Escherichia coli CRISPR-Cas System , 2015, Cell.

[29]  Ido Golding,et al.  Single-virus tracking reveals a spatial receptor-dependent search mechanism. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Kira S. Makarova,et al.  Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems , 2016, Science.

[31]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Crystal structure of the CRISPR RNA–guided surveillance complex from Escherichia coli , 2014, Science.

[32]  B. Wiedenheft,et al.  Mechanism of CRISPR-RNA guided recognition of DNA targets in Escherichia coli , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[33]  Colby S. McIntosh,et al.  Lysis‐lysogeny coexistence: prophage integration during lytic development , 2016, MicrobiologyOpen.

[34]  Stan J. J. Brouns,et al.  Cas3-Derived Target DNA Degradation Fragments Fuel Primed CRISPR Adaptation. , 2016, Molecular cell.

[35]  A Single-Molecule Hershey-Chase Experiment , 2012, Current Biology.