Abstract Vortex modeling has a long history. Descartes (1644) used it as a model for the solar systems. J. J. Thomsom (1883) used it as a model for the atom. We consider point-vortex systems, which can be regarded as “discrete” solutions of the Euler equation. Their dynamics is described by a Hamiltonian system of equations. We are interested in polygonal configurations and how their stability depends upon various dynamical variables. In the plane a polygon with seven vortices has been shown to be a special boundary case: polygons with N 7 vortices are (linearly and nonlinearly) stable while polygons with N > 7 vortices are unstable. Why should N = 7 be special? Celestial Mechanics helped us to simplify a problem that has been studied for over a century, and to show that the case of Thomson’s Heptagon is actually a case of bifurcation at infinity. This becomes particularly clear when considering the corresponding problem of a ring on a sphere with two polar vortices of variable intensities Γ N and Γ S , at the North and South Pole, respectively.
[1]
Dieter S. Schmidt,et al.
Stability of Relative Equilibria in the Problem of N+1 Vortices
,
1999,
SIAM J. Math. Anal..
[2]
P. Newton,et al.
Motion of three point vortices on a sphere
,
1998
.
[3]
V. Yudovich,et al.
The stability of stationary rotation of a regular vortex polygon.
,
2002,
Chaos.
[4]
Norman Feather,et al.
Electricity and Matter
,
1969
.
[5]
T. Havelock,et al.
LII.The stability of motion of rectilinear vortices in ring formation
,
1931
.
[6]
Y. Kimura.
Vortex motion on surfaces with constant curvature
,
1999,
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[7]
M. Roberts,et al.
Stability of Relative Equilibria of Point Vortices on the Sphere
,
2005
.