Boring chatter identification by multi-sensor feature fusion and manifold learning

In the boring process, chatter is easy to occur because of the large overhang of the boring bar and the poor structural stiffness of the system. The key technique to reduce the chatter effect in boring process is to identify the chatter state accurately. In this paper, a method of chatter identification based on multi-sensor feature fusion and manifold learning is proposed. Displacement sensor, acceleration sensor, and acoustic pressure sensor are used to acquire processing signals synchronously, and then triple signals are decomposed by empirical mode decomposition (EMD). The multi-indicators are used to construct high-dimensional space, and then different manifold learning algorithms are used to reduce feature dimensionality. Support vector machine chatter identification models are obtained to verify the effect of boring chatter identification. Multi-sensor feature fusion realizes the complementary of different features and achieves better recognition results. The results show that the proposed method can identify boring chatter effectively. And the best result is obtained by the combination of the displacement sensor and acceleration sensor.

[1]  Ibrahim N. Tansel,et al.  Detecting chatter and estimating wear from the torque of end milling signals by using Index Based Reasoner (IBR) , 2012 .

[2]  Hongrui Cao,et al.  Chatter detection based on synchrosqueezing transform and statistical indicators in milling process , 2018 .

[3]  Pengjian Shang,et al.  Complexity–entropy causality plane based on power spectral entropy for complex time series , 2018, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications.

[4]  G.-J. Lai,et al.  A Study of the Monitoring and Suppression System for Turning Slender Workpieces , 1995 .

[5]  Zichen Chen,et al.  On-line chatter detection and identification based on wavelet and support vector machine , 2010 .

[6]  Kai Zhou,et al.  Early chatter detection in end milling based on multi-feature fusion and 3σ criterion , 2017 .

[7]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[8]  Shufang Li,et al.  Feature extraction and recognition of ictal EEG using EMD and SVM , 2013, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[9]  Rusinek Rafal,et al.  Chatter identification methods on the basis of time series measured during titanium superalloy milling , 2015 .

[10]  Cesar Giovanni Cabrera,et al.  On the wavelet analysis of cutting forces for chatter identification in milling , 2017 .

[11]  Amin Al-Habaibeh,et al.  A new approach for systematic design of condition monitoring systems for milling processes , 2000 .

[12]  Edvard Govekar,et al.  Chatter detection in band sawing based on discriminant analysis of sound features , 2014 .

[13]  D. Donoho,et al.  Hessian eigenmaps: Locally linear embedding techniques for high-dimensional data , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  O. Ryabov,et al.  Laser displacement meter application for milling diagnostics , 1998 .

[15]  Hongyuan Zha,et al.  Principal Manifolds and Nonlinear Dimension Reduction via Local Tangent Space Alignment , 2002, ArXiv.

[16]  Elso Kuljanić,et al.  Multisensor approaches for chatter detection in milling , 2008 .

[17]  Minqiang Xu,et al.  Fault diagnosis of bearing based on Symbolic Aggregate approXimation and Lempel-Ziv , 2019, Measurement.

[18]  Kenneth Falconer,et al.  Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications , 1990 .

[19]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Tool wear and chatter detection using the coherence function of two crossed accelerations , 1997 .

[20]  Joaquim Ciurana,et al.  Sound mapping for identification of stability lobe diagrams in milling processes , 2009 .

[21]  Zhibing Liu,et al.  Early milling chatter identification by improved empirical mode decomposition and multi-indicator synthetic evaluation , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[22]  Hongyuan Zha,et al.  Principal manifolds and nonlinear dimensionality reduction via tangent space alignment , 2004, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[23]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. , 2000, Science.

[24]  Y. Shin,et al.  A multimodal intelligent monitoring system for turning processes , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.

[25]  Gábor Stépán,et al.  On stability prediction for milling , 2005 .

[26]  Jianfeng Li,et al.  Vibration analysis in milling titanium alloy based on signal processing of cutting force , 2013 .

[27]  Yasuhiro Takaya,et al.  Tool condition monitoring technique for deep-hole drilling of large components based on chatter identification in time–frequency domain , 2017 .

[28]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Integrated vibration and acoustic data fusion for chatter and tool condition classification in milling , 2016, 2016 International Symposium on Flexible Automation (ISFA).

[29]  Mikhail Belkin,et al.  Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation , 2003, Neural Computation.

[30]  Philip K. Chan,et al.  In-process detection and suppression of chatter in milling , 1992 .