Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic study of BMS-247550, an epothilone B analog, administered intravenously on a daily schedule for five days.

PURPOSE The epothilones are a novel class of nontaxane microtubule-stabilizing agents. BMS-247550 is a semisynthetic analog of the natural product epothilone B. We conducted a phase I study administering BMS-247550 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 21 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients received BMS-247550 without filgrastim in the first cycle. An additional six patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 8 mg/m2/d with filgrastim support. Twenty-one of the 27 patients had received prior paclitaxel, docetaxel, or both. RESULTS One hundred seven cycles were administered to 27 patients. The maximum-tolerated dose was 6 mg/m2 of BMS-247550 administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion daily for 5 consecutive days every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicity at a dose of 8 mg/m2/d was neutropenia with or without filgrastim support. Nonhematologic grade 3 toxicities included fatigue (seven cycles), stomatitis (two cycles), and anorexia (one cycle). The mean terminal half-life of BMS-247550 was 16.8 +/- 6.0 hours, the volume of distribution at steady-state was 798 +/- 375 L, and the clearance was 712 +/- 247 mL/min. Objective responses were observed in patients with breast, cervical, and basal cell cancer. Reductions in CA-125 levels were noted in patients with ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION The recommended phase II dose of BMS-247550 on the daily schedule for 5 days is 6 mg/m2/d. Neutropenia was dose limiting, but higher doses were tolerated by a large fraction of patients with filgrastim support. Peripheral neuropathy was mild, even after multiple cycles of therapy, and was not dose limiting.

[1]  F. Lee,et al.  BMS-247550: a novel epothilone analog with a mode of action similar to paclitaxel but possessing superior antitumor efficacy. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[2]  M. Piccart-Gebhart,et al.  Phase I clinical and pharmacology study of the novel epothilone analog BMS-247550 given weekly in patients advanced solid tumors , 2001 .

[3]  J. Tokarski,et al.  Synthesis, structure proof, and biological activity of epothilone cyclopropanes. , 2000, Organic letters.

[4]  Susan Band Horwitz,et al.  Structure–Activity Relationship of the Epothilones and the First In Vivo Comparison with Paclitaxel† , 1997 .

[5]  F. Sasse,et al.  Epothilone B stabilizes microtubuli of macrophages like taxol without showing taxol-like endotoxin activity. , 1997, Cancer research.

[6]  R Simon,et al.  Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  K. Nicolaou,et al.  Synthesis of epothilones A and B in solid and solution phase , 1997, Nature.

[8]  E. Rowinsky The taxanes: dosing and scheduling considerations. , 1997, Oncology.

[9]  P. Giannakakou,et al.  Activities of the Microtubule-stabilizing Agents Epothilones A and B with Purified Tubulin and in Cells Resistant to Paclitaxel (Taxol®)* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  A. Monks,et al.  Resistance to paclitaxel mediated by P-glycoprotein can be modulated by changes in the schedule of administration , 1997, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[11]  E. Eisenhauer,et al.  Phase I trial design: are new methodologies being put into practice? , 1996, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[12]  S. Arbuck,et al.  Workshop on phase I study design. Ninth NCI/EORTC New Drug Development Symposium, Amsterdam, March 12, 1996. , 1996, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  H Irschik,et al.  Epothilons A and B: antifungal and cytotoxic compounds from Sorangium cellulosum (Myxobacteria). Production, physico-chemical and biological properties. , 1996, The Journal of antibiotics.

[14]  K. Gelmon,et al.  Multicenter, randomized comparative study of two doses of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  L. Gianni Theoretical and practical aspects of paclitaxel scheduling. , 1995, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  E. Lazarides,et al.  Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. , 1995, Cancer research.

[17]  R E Wittes,et al.  Paclitaxel in doxorubicin-refractory or mitoxantrone-refractory breast cancer: a phase I/II trial of 96-hour infusion. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  M J Ratain,et al.  Statistical and ethical issues in the design and conduct of phase I and II clinical trials of new anticancer agents. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  M. Hawkins Early cancer clinical trials: safety, numbers, and consent. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.