Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops

319 The results show the variability of benefits from region to region and year to year. A survey of Indian cotton farmers in crop harvest years 2005–2006 through 2007–2008 showed that Bt cotton growers in Gujarat had larger yield improvements than their counterparts in Maharashtra, with the former obtaining 82–150% greater yields, whereas the latter obtained only 24–40% higher yields. Smallholders in KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, who were surveyed from harvest years 1998–1999 to 2000–2001 reported a yield benefit associated with Bt cotton between 56% and 85%, which is attributed to variable weather conditions and pest pressure from year to year. It is important to note that the analysis of yield differences is complicated by differences in yield potential and other characteristics of background germplasm that may differ between the varieties that are available with and without the engineered trait. For example, the first Bt cotton varieties to be approved for commercialization in India had been in the regulatory pipeline for several years, during which time conventional breeding had continued to produce varieties with superior yields and disease resistance. These earliest official varieties were known to be susceptible to wilt when subjected to early moisture stress, which may have driven the negative results observed Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops

[1]  R. Bennett,et al.  The economic impact of genetically modified cotton on South African smallholders: Yield, profit and health effects , 2006 .

[2]  Julian M. Alston,et al.  An Ex Ante Analysis of the Benefits from the Adoption of Corn Rootworm Resistant, Transgenic Corn Technology , 2003 .

[3]  Micheal D. K. Owen,et al.  Survey of Tillage Trends Following The Adoption of Glyphosate-Resistant Crops , 2009, Weed Technology.

[4]  R. Bennett,et al.  Reductions in insecticide use from adoption of Bt cotton in South Africa: impacts on economic performance and toxic load to the environment , 2004, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[5]  G. A. Carlson,et al.  The net benefits, including convenience, of Roundup Ready® soybeans: results from a national survey. , 2004 .

[6]  Matin Qaim,et al.  Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects , 2005, Environment and Development Economics.

[7]  Robert Tripp,et al.  Biotechnology and agricultural development: transgenic cotton, rural institutions and resource-poor farmers. , 2009 .

[8]  J. Burkhardt Biotechnology's future benefits: prediction or promise? , 2002 .

[9]  E. Trigo,et al.  Ten years of genetically modified crops in Argentine agriculture , 2006 .

[10]  Jikun Huang,et al.  'Bt cotton' benefits, costs and impacts in China , 2003 .

[11]  Michele C. Marra,et al.  The Value of Non-Pecuniary Characteristics of Crop Biotechnologies: A New Look at the Evidence , 2006 .

[12]  R. Herring Whose numbers count? Probing discrepant evidence on transgenic cotton in the Warangal district of India , 2008 .

[13]  Greg Traxler,et al.  Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects , 2004 .

[14]  David Zilberman,et al.  Adoption of Bt Cotton and Impact Variability: Insights from India , 2006 .

[15]  J. Falck-Zepeda,et al.  Transgenic Cotton in Mexico: A Case Study of the Comarca Lagunera , 2003 .

[16]  D. Towery,et al.  Conservation Tillage and Plant Biotechnology : How New Technologies Can Improve the Environment By Reducing the Need to Plow , 2002 .

[17]  Ada Wossink,et al.  Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production , 2006 .

[18]  Fangbin Qiao,et al.  Impact of Bt Cotton in China , 2001 .

[19]  David Zilberman,et al.  Regulating agricultural biotechnology : economics and policy , 2006 .

[20]  Nicholas G. Kalaitzandonakes,et al.  The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech: A Global Perspective , 2003 .

[21]  Stuart E. Marsh,et al.  Farm-scale evaluation of the impacts of transgenic cotton on biodiversity, pesticide use, and yield , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.