Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use

Objective: We explored constraints in responding to spatially variable stimuli when hand movements are transformed into inverse movements of a tool. Background: Generally, the spatial compatibility between stimuli and responses is a powerful determinant of performance. However, many tasks require the use of simple tools such as first-class levers that transform hand movements into inverted movements of a tool. What types of compatibility effects arise with such tools? Method: Participants moved the tip of a pointer to the left or right according to the color of a stimulus. The pointer was manipulated either directly, so that a hand movement caused a pointer movement in the corresponding direction, or indirectly, so that the hand moved the pointer in the opposite direction. Results: Responding was faster when the location of stimulus and the movement direction of the tool corresponded than when they did not correspond, independent of the movement direction of the hand. This occurred when stimulus location was task relevant (Experiment 1) as well as when it was task irrelevant (Experiment 2). Furthermore, responding was delayed when the hand and the relevant end of the tool moved in noncorresponding rather than corresponding directions. Conclusion: These results point to two distinct compatibility effects in tool use: one that relates to the transformation of stimuli into goals and one that relates to the transformation of goals into movements. Application: Potential applications of this research include the prediction and possibly manipulation of unwanted “fulcrum effects” in laparoscopic surgery and other first-class lever movements.

[1]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Multiple spatial codes and temporal overlap in choice-reaction tasks , 1996 .

[2]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  B. Hommel Inverting the Simon effect intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. , 1993 .

[4]  B. Hommel Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[5]  B. Kerr Decisions about movement direction and extent , 1976 .

[6]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility with wheel-rotation responses: Will an incompatible response coding be used when a compatible coding is possible? , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related bile duct injuries: a health and financial disaster. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[8]  Motonori Yamaguchi,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[9]  R. Proctor,et al.  Mixing compatible and incompatible mappings: Elimination, reduction, and enhancement of spatial compatibility effects , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[10]  W. Kunde,et al.  Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Differential effects of central and peripheral cues on the reorienting of spatial attention. , 1991 .

[12]  E. Megaw Direction and extent uncertainty in step-input tracking. , 1972, Journal of motor behavior.

[13]  Wilfried Kunde,et al.  Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects? , 2008 .

[14]  Y. Guiard,et al.  The lateral coding of rotations: a study of the simon effect with wheel-rotation responses. , 1983, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Experienced laparoscopic surgeons are automated to the "fulcrum effect": an ergonomic demonstration. , 1999, Endoscopy.

[16]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual basis of bimanual coordination , 2001, Nature.

[17]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  I. Koch,et al.  Verbal response-effect compatibility , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[19]  Robert W Proctor,et al.  The Simon Effect With Wheel-Rotation Responses , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  J. Hoffmann,et al.  Anticipated Action Effects Affect the Selection, Initiation, and Execution of Actions , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.