Electromagnetic Interference With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at Power Frequency: An In Vivo Study

Background— The number of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for the prevention of sudden cardiac death is continuing to increase. Given the technological complexity of ICDs, it is of critical importance to identify and control possible harmful electromagnetic interferences between various sources of electromagnetic fields and ICDs in daily life and occupational environments. Methods and Results— Interference thresholds of 110 ICD patients (1-, 2-, and 3-chamber ICDs) were evaluated in a specifically developed test site. Patients were exposed to single and combined electric and magnetic 50-Hz fields with strengths of up to 30 kV·m−1 and 2.55 mT. Tests were conducted considering worst-case conditions, including maximum sensitivity of the device or full inspiration. With devices being programmed to nominal sensitivity, ICDs remained unaffected in 91 patients (83%). Five of 110 devices (5%) showed transient loss of accurate right ventricular sensing, whereas 14 of 31 (45%) of the 2- and 3-chamber devices displayed impaired right atrial sensing. No interference was detected in 71 patients (65%) within the tested limits with programming to maximum sensitivity, whereas 20 of 110 subjects (18%) exhibited right ventricular disturbances and 19 of 31 (61%) subjects exhibited right atrial disturbances. Conclusions— Extremely low-frequency daily-life electromagnetic fields do not disturb sensing capabilities of ICDs. However, strong 50-Hz electromagnetic fields, present in certain occupational environments, may cause inappropriate sensing, potentially leading to false detection of atrial/ventricular arrhythmic events. When the right atrial/right ventricular interferences are compared, the atrial lead is more susceptible to electromagnetic fields. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01626261. Unique identifier: NCT01626261.

[1]  F Gustrau,et al.  ACTIVE MEDICAL IMPLANTS AND OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY - MEASUREMENT AND NUMERICAL CALCULATION OF INTERFERENCE VOLTAGE , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[2]  A. Bahl,et al.  Inappropriate shock delivery by implantable cardioverter defibrillator due to electrical interference with washing machine. , 2007, International journal of cardiology.

[3]  A. Silny The interference threshold of cardiac pacemakers in electric 50 Hz fields , 2001, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[4]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[5]  Craig S. Miller,et al.  Interference of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator activity during electronic dental device use. , 2010, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Electromagnetic interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from low-frequency electromagnetic fields in vivo. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[7]  G. Ziegelberger,et al.  International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. , 2006, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[8]  D. Rawling,et al.  Inappropriate ICD Shocks for Inappropriate Reasons , 2008, Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal.

[9]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Interference of low frequency magnetic fields with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators , 2012, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[10]  J Silny,et al.  Unipolar cardiac pacemakers in electromagnetic fields of high voltage overhead lines , 2005, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[11]  M. Stuchly,et al.  Modelling fields induced in humans by 50/60 Hz magnetic fields: reliability of the results and effects of model variations. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  D.W. Deno,et al.  Currents induced in the human body by high voltage transmission line electric fieldߞMeasurement and calculation of distribution and dose , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[13]  K. Jokela,et al.  ICNIRP Guidelines GUIDELINES FOR LIMITING EXPOSURE TO TIME-VARYING , 1998 .

[14]  A. Scholten, J. Silny,et al.  The interference threshold of unipolar cardiac pacemakers in extremely low frequency magnetic fields , 2001, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[15]  N AamiPacemakerCommittee-EMCtaskforcePac,et al.  Active implantable medical devices-Electromagnetic compatibility-EMC test protocols for implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators , 1999 .

[16]  Raphael R. Garofalo,et al.  Effect of electronic apex locators on cardiac pacemaker function. , 2002 .

[17]  J. Lambrozo,et al.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator and 50-Hz electric and magnetic fields exposure in the workplace , 2011, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[18]  J. Kluger,et al.  Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) and Arrhythmic Events in ICD Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Procedures , 2007, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[19]  Martine Souques,et al.  Clinical study of interference with cardiac pacemakers by a magnetic field at power line frequencies. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  A. Babouri,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Implantable Cardiac Pacemaker Exposed to Low Frequency Magnetic Field , 2009, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[21]  J. Silny,et al.  The influence of anatomical and physiological parameters on the interference voltage at the input of unipolar cardiac pacemakers in low frequency electric fields , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  L Toivonen,et al.  The Influence of Elevated 50 Hz Electric and Magnetic Fields on Implanted Cardiac Pacemakers: The Role of the Lead Configuration and Programming of the Sensitivity , 1991, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[24]  R. Strasser,et al.  Ventricular oversensing in 518 patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators: incidence, complications, and solutions. , 2007, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  C. Schmitt,et al.  Incidence of Electromagnetic Interference in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators , 2001, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[26]  B Parker,et al.  The influence of electromagnetic environment on the performance of artificial cardiac pacemakers. , 1968, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  Wojciech Zareba,et al.  Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in MADIT II: frequency, mechanisms, predictors, and survival impact. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.