Ordinal consensus measure with objective threshold for heterogeneous large-scale group decision making

Abstract Because of the increasing complexity of real-world decision-making environment, there is a trend that a large number of decision-makers are becoming involved in group decision making problems. In large-scale group decision making problems, owing to various backgrounds and psychological cognition, it is natural to use heterogeneous representation forms (quantitative or qualitative) to express distinct preference information for different decision-makers. In this paper, we investigate the consensus reaching process in the environment of heterogeneous large-scale group decision making. A novel ordinal consensus measure with an objective threshold based on preference orderings is proposed. This process contains five parts: (1) obtaining ordinal preferences; (2) classifying all decision-makers into several subgroups using the ordinal k-means clustering algorithm; (3) measuring consensus levels of subgroups and the global group using novel ordinal consensus indexes; (4) providing suggestions for decision-makers to revise preferences using feedback strategies; (5) obtaining final decision result. An illustrative example is provided to verify the implementation of the proposed consensus model. Lastly, we discuss the approaches to determine the appropriate number of clusters and the initialization center points for the proposed ordinal k-means clustering algorithm.

[1]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[2]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Consensus Model to Detect and Manage Noncooperative Behaviors in Large-Scale Group Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[3]  Qi Sun,et al.  An attitudinal consensus degree to control the feedback mechanism in group decision making with different adjustment cost , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Chonghui Guo,et al.  An approach to group decision making with heterogeneous incomplete uncertain preference relations , 2014, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[5]  Gang Kou,et al.  Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[7]  Yejun Xu,et al.  A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with an application to earthquake shelter selection , 2018, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[8]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Confidence consensus-based model for large-scale group decision making: A novel approach to managing non-cooperative behaviors , 2019, Inf. Sci..

[9]  Ken-ichi Inada THE SIMPLE MAJORITY DECISION RULE , 1969 .

[10]  Patricio A. Vela,et al.  A Comparative Study of Efficient Initialization Methods for the K-Means Clustering Algorithm , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Yejun Xu,et al.  Alternative Ranking-Based Clustering and Reliability Index-Based Consensus Reaching Process for Hesitant Fuzzy Large Scale Group Decision Making , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[12]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A New Consensus Model for Group Decision Making Problems With Non-Homogeneous Experts , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[13]  Victor J. Rayward-Smith,et al.  Adapting k-means for supervised clustering , 2006, Applied Intelligence.

[14]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency Measures for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[16]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[17]  Kumaraswamy Ponnambalam,et al.  A clustering method for large-scale group decision-making with multi-stage hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms , 2019, Inf. Fusion.

[18]  Xiaohong Chen,et al.  Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[20]  Xiao-hong Chen,et al.  A dynamical consensus method based on exit-delegation mechanism for large group emergency decision making , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[21]  Yanbing Ju,et al.  Dual hesitant fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators and their applications to multi-attribute decision making , 2014, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[22]  Iván Palomares Carrascosa LGDM Approaches and Models: A Literature Review , 2018 .

[23]  P. Rousseeuw Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis , 1987 .

[24]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation , 2016, Appl. Soft Comput..

[25]  L. Seiford,et al.  Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation , 1978 .

[26]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[27]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments , 1996, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[28]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  A consensus reaching model for hesitant information with different preference structures , 2017, Knowl. Based Syst..

[29]  Angelo Gaeta,et al.  Resilience Analysis of Critical Infrastructures: A Cognitive Approach Based on Granular Computing , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[30]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Sequential funding the venture project or not? A prospect consensus process with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference information , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[32]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Deng-Feng Li,et al.  A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Framework of Group Decision Making With Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Information , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[36]  Jie Lu,et al.  An Integrated Group Decision-Making Method Dealing with Fuzzy Preferences for Alternatives and Individual Judgments for Selection Criteria , 2003 .

[37]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A Historical Account of Types of Fuzzy Sets and Their Relationships , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[38]  K. Atanassov,et al.  Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets , 2019, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[39]  V. Torra,et al.  A framework for linguistic logic programming , 2010 .

[40]  Guy De Tré,et al.  A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[41]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 1986 .

[42]  S. Orlovsky Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation , 1978 .

[43]  Huchang Liao,et al.  A Comparison of Distinct Consensus Measures for Group Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations , 2017, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[44]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[45]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Distance-based and ad hoc consensus models in ordinal preference ranking , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[46]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Consensus Building for the Heterogeneous Large-Scale GDM With the Individual Concerns and Satisfactions , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[47]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[48]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic and interval-valued intutionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a group , 2009, Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak..

[49]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[50]  Teofilo F. GONZALEZ,et al.  Clustering to Minimize the Maximum Intercluster Distance , 1985, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[51]  Huchang Liao,et al.  An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[52]  Dengfeng Li,et al.  Fuzzy LINMAP approach to heterogeneous MADM considering comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degrees , 2013 .

[53]  Macarena Espinilla,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HETEROGENEOUS DECISION ANALYSIS APPROACHES APPLIED TO SUSTAINABLE ENERGY EVALUATION , 2012 .

[54]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Multiplicative Consistency of hesitant fuzzy Preference Relation and its Application in Group Decision Making , 2014, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[55]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment , 2014, Inf. Fusion.

[56]  M. Kendall Rank Correlation Methods , 1949 .

[57]  Yinghua Shen,et al.  A two-layer weight determination method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making experts in a linguistic environment , 2015, Inf. Fusion.

[58]  Yi Peng,et al.  A Group Decision Making Model for Integrating Heterogeneous Information , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[59]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A continuous interval-valued linguistic ORESTE method for multi-criteria group decision making , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..