Prediction of nociceptive responses during sedation by time-frequency representation

The level of sedation in patients undergoing medical procedures evolves continuously, such as the effect of the anesthetic and analgesic agents is counteracted by pain stimuli. The monitors of depth of anesthesia, based on the analysis of the electroencephalogram (EEG), have been progressively introduced into the daily practice to provide additional information about the state of the patient. However, the quantification of analgesia still remains an open problem. The purpose of this work is to analyze the capability of prediction of nociceptive responses based on the time-frequency representation (TFR) of EEG signal. Functions of spectral entropy, instantaneous power and instantaneous frequency were calculated in order to predict the presence or absence of the nociceptive responses to different stimuli during sedation in endoscopy procedure. Values of prediction probability of Pk above 0.75 and percentages of sensitivity and specificity above 70% and 65% respectively were achieved combining TFR functions with bispectral index (BIS) and with concentrations of propofol (CeProp) and remifentanil (CeRemi).

[1]  P. Gifani,et al.  Optimal fractal-scaling analysis of human EEG dynamic for depth of anesthesia quantification , 2007, J. Frankl. Inst..

[2]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Comparison of Conventional Averaged and Rapid Averaged, Autoregressive-based Extracted Auditory Evoked Potentials for Monitoring the Hypnotic Level during Propofol Induction , 2002, Anesthesiology.

[3]  Tarmo Lipping,et al.  Comparison of entropy and complexity measures for the assessment of depth of sedation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  M. Ramsay,et al.  Controlled Sedation with Alphaxalone-Alphadolone , 1974, British medical journal.

[5]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Removal of peak and spike noise in EEG signals based on the analytic signal magnitude , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Pere Caminal,et al.  Characterization of the cerebral activity by time–frequency representation of evoked EEG potentials , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[7]  S. Henneberg,et al.  Autoregressive Modeling with Exogenous Input of Middle-Latency Auditory-Evoked Potentials to Measure Rapid Changes in Depth of Anesthesia , 1996, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[8]  I. Rampil A Primer for EEG Signal Processing in Anesthesia , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[9]  I Korhonen,et al.  Stimulation induced variability of pulse plethysmography does not discriminate responsiveness to intubation. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  I Korhonen,et al.  Novel multiparameter approach for measurement of nociception at skin incision during general anaesthesia. , 2006, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Measuring the Performance of Anesthetic Depth Indicators , 1996, Anesthesiology.

[12]  J. Bruhn,et al.  Pharmacodynamic Interaction between Propofol and Remifentanil Regarding Hypnosis, Tolerance of Laryngoscopy, Bispectral Index, and Electroencephalographic Approximate Entropy , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[13]  J. De Jonckheere,et al.  Validation of a graphic measurement of heart rate variability to assess analgesia/nociception balance during general anesthesia , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  A. Yli-Hankala,et al.  Description of the Entropy™ algorithm as applied in the Datex‐Ohmeda S/5™ Entropy Module , 2004, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[15]  J. Sleigh,et al.  Analysis of depth of anesthesia with Hilbert–Huang spectral entropy , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Nassib G. Chamoun,et al.  An introduction to bispectral analysis for the electroencephalogram , 1994, Journal of Clinical Monitoring.

[17]  H. Storm Changes in skin conductance as a tool to monitor nociceptive stimulation and pain , 2008, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.