Serial assessments of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance predict contractile recovery and clinical outcome after reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS The purpose of the study was to investigate, using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), the presence and time course of microvascular obstruction (MO) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to test its relationship with cardiac remodeling and clinical outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS 53 patients with AMI and successful percutaneous reperfusion underwent CMR examination at four separate timepoints: within the first 48 hours, at 10 days, at six and twelve months after infarction. MO was quantified immediately (early imaging) and 10 minutes (late imaging) after contrast administration in each session. The extent of MO decreased from early to late imaging at both the first and the second CMR exam (p≤0.001). Early MO was absent in 18(36%) patients both at 48 hours and 10 days after AMI. At 1 year follow-up, LVEF in these patients improved to normal (median = 62% (53-70)). Early MO was present in the first but not in the second CMR in 13 (26%) patients; LVEF at one year in these patients reached a median = 52% (47-61). Finally, Early MO was present in both exams in 19 (38%) patients, who at 1 year after infarction had a LVEF of median = 49% (42-54, P≤0.001 across groups). The time course of MO was a predictor of prognosis upon Kaplan-Meier analysis (P = 0.035). The presence of MO at 10 days after AMI was associated with a higher risk of MACE during a 5-years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The presence of MO within 48 hours after AMI, and its time course in the following ten days, provides complementary information on both functional myocardial recovery and long-term outcome.

[1]  Christoph Hennersperger,et al.  Standardized 2D ultrasound versus 3D/4D ultrasound and image fusion for measurement of aortic aneurysm diameter in follow-up after EVAR. , 2016, Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation.

[2]  O. Kamp,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , 2012, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[3]  G. Niccoli,et al.  Impact of microvascular obstruction and infarct size on left ventricular remodeling in reperfused myocardial infarction: a contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  G. Schuler,et al.  Impact of early vs. late microvascular obstruction assessed by magnetic resonance imaging on long-term outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison with traditional prognostic markers. , 2010, European heart journal.

[5]  J. McMurray,et al.  Microvascular Obstruction Remains a Portent of Adverse Remodeling in Optimally Treated Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[6]  R. Kim,et al.  Detection and characteristics of microvascular obstruction in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using an optimized protocol for contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, European Radiology.

[7]  S. Petersen,et al.  Area at Risk and Viability after Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion Can Be Determined by Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2009, European Surgical Research.

[8]  A. Lalande,et al.  Major prognostic impact of persistent microvascular obstruction as assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction , 2009, European Radiology.

[9]  P. Algra,et al.  Assessment of microvascular obstruction and prediction of short-term remodeling after acute myocardial infarction: cardiac MR imaging study. , 2009, Radiology.

[10]  V. Pineda,et al.  No-reflow phenomenon in cardiac MRI: diagnosis and clinical implications. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  R. Jaffe,et al.  Microvascular Obstruction and the No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2008, Circulation.

[12]  S. Dymarkowski,et al.  Determinants and impact of microvascular obstruction in successfully reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Assessment by magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, European Radiology.

[13]  S. Iliceto,et al.  Influence of transmurality, infarct size, and severe microvascular obstruction on left ventricular remodeling and function after primary coronary angioplasty. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  G. Raff,et al.  Microvascular obstruction and myocardial function after acute myocardial infarction: assessment by using contrast-enhanced cine MR imaging. , 2006, Radiology.

[15]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients. , 2006, Radiology.

[16]  Henry R. Halperin,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Multidetector Computed Tomography Viability Imaging After Myocardial Infarction: Characterization of Myocyte Death, Microvascular Obstruction, and Chronic Scar , 2006, Circulation.

[17]  H. Kestler,et al.  Sequelae of acute myocardial infarction regarding cardiac structure and function and their prognostic significance as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2005, European heart journal.

[18]  Gerhard Adam,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[19]  M. Robson,et al.  Influence of contrast agent dose and image acquisition timing on the quantitative determination of nonviable myocardial tissue using delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[20]  S. Dymarkowski,et al.  Visualization of Ventricular Thrombi With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease , 2002, Circulation.

[21]  R. Kloner,et al.  The “no-reflow” phenomenon: basic science and clinical correlates , 2002, Heart.

[22]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[23]  Hugo A. Katus,et al.  Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[24]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Microvascular obstruction and left ventricular remodeling early after acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Circulation.

[25]  Bruce R. Brodie,et al.  Coronary Angioplasty with or without Stent Implantation for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1999 .

[26]  A. Lalande,et al.  MR imaging of the heart in patients after myocardial infarction: effect of increasing intersection gap on measurements of left ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and wall thickness. , 1999, Radiology.

[27]  Y. Shimono,et al.  Assessment of "microvascular no-reflow phenomenon" using technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin scintigraphy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  E R McVeigh,et al.  Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[29]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[30]  R. Kim,et al.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[31]  M. Hori,et al.  Clinical implications of the 'no reflow' phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[32]  A. Kitabatake,et al.  Lack of Myocardial Perfusion Immediately After Successful Thrombolysis: A Predictor of Poor Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Anterior Myocardial Infarction , 1992, Circulation.

[33]  F. Sheehan,et al.  Early recovery of left ventricular function after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: an important determinant of survival. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  R. Kloner,et al.  The "no-reflow" phenomenon after temporary coronary occlusion in the dog. , 1974, The Journal of clinical investigation.