Evaluation and selection of third party logistics provider under sustainability perspectives: an interval valued fuzzy-rough approach

In today’s world, industries are facing massive pressure to integrate sustainability issues for efficient and successful supply chain management (SCM). Hence, worldwide it has become critically important to make economic operational balance satisfying environment protection norms and social welfare perspectives. Consequently, the industries are investigating their SCM structures in association with a third party logistics (3PL) service provider adopting the triple bottom line framework for improving the overall supply chain performance. Therefore, selection of the right 3PL provider for the sustainable alliance is supremely important for broader perspective of greater business value. Thus, the main objective of this research work is the selection of most appropriate 3PL provider for a food manufacturing company (FMC) after systematic evaluation of six different feasible logistic providers serving over a decade in India. Selection of optimal alternative 3PL provider is very complex and challenging because of the qualitative description of service provider performances and the inherent uncertainty due to subjectivity. The concept of interval-valued fuzzy-rough number (IVFRN) offers perfect treatment of such uncertainty. In this paper, we develop a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) model combining the factor relationship (FARE) and multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) models based on IVFRN. The proposed model is tested and validated on a case study where the optimal selection of 3PL providers is performed for an Indian FMC. Based on the results obtained in sensitivity analysis, it was shown that the proposed IVFRN based FARE-MABAC model produces stable/consistent solutions. Through the research presented in this paper, it is shown that the new hybrid MCDM method is a useful and reliable tool for rational decision-making.

[1]  PamuarDragan,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[2]  Zdzisław Pawlak,et al.  Imprecise Categories, Approximations and Rough Sets , 1991 .

[3]  Shu-Ping Wan,et al.  An intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming method for logistics outsourcing provider selection , 2015, Knowl. Based Syst..

[4]  Chong Wu,et al.  Partner selection for reverse logistics centres in green supply chains: a fuzzy artificial immune optimisation approach , 2016 .

[5]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making , 2015 .

[6]  Kazimierz Zaras,et al.  Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute dominance for deterministic, stochastic and fuzzy decision problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Ian Paul McCarthy,et al.  The impact of outsourcing on the transaction costs and boundaries of manufacturing , 2004 .

[8]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Third party logistics (3PL) selection for cold chain management: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach , 2018, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models , 1989 .

[11]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  An Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP and SWOT Method for Outsourcing Reverse Logistics Highlights , 2015 .

[12]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Quality management, environmental management maturity, green supply chain practices and green performance of Brazilian companies with ISO 14001 certification: Direct and indirect effects , 2014 .

[13]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  Decision Support Framework for Selection of 3PL Service Providers: Dominance-Based Approach in Combination with Grey Set Theory , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[14]  J.G.A.J. van der Vorst,et al.  A classification of logistic outsourcing levels and their impact on service performance: Evidence from the food processing industry , 2010 .

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Evaluating the performance of suppliers based on using the R'AMATEL-MAIRCA method for green supply chain implementation in electronics industry , 2018 .

[16]  Hosang Jung,et al.  Evaluation of Third Party Logistics Providers Considering Social Sustainability , 2017 .

[17]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Optimal selection of third-party logistics service providers using quality function deployment and Taguchi loss function , 2015 .

[18]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of third-party logistics providers using a CRITIC–WASPAS approach with interval type-2 fuzzy sets , 2017 .

[19]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  A combined MCDM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry , 2016 .

[20]  Romualdas Ginevicius,et al.  A New Determining Method for the Criteria Weights in multicriteria Evaluation , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[21]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Hybrid MCDM Approach for Strategic Project Portfolio Selection of Agro By-Products , 2017 .

[22]  Geraldo Cardoso de Oliveira Neto,et al.  Selection of Logistic Service Providers for the transportation of refrigerated goods , 2017 .

[23]  Aicha Aguezzoul,et al.  Third-party logistics selection problem: A literature review on criteria and methods , 2014 .

[24]  Dragan Pamuar,et al.  Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers , 2017 .

[25]  Ivan Petrovic,et al.  Modification of the Best-Worst and MABAC methods: A novel approach based on interval-valued fuzzy-rough numbers , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2012 .

[27]  Liang Liang,et al.  Service outsourcing and disaster response methods in a relief supply chain , 2016, Ann. Oper. Res..

[28]  M. Razzaque,et al.  Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey , 1998 .

[29]  D. Sculli,et al.  An outsourcing decision model for sustaining long-term performance , 2005 .

[30]  Hak-Keung Lam,et al.  Classification of epilepsy using computational intelligence techniques , 2016, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol..

[31]  Hong Wang,et al.  A 3PL supplier selection model based on fuzzy sets , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[32]  M. Goh,et al.  Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry , 2017 .

[33]  S. Kendrick,et al.  The Use of Third-Party Logistics Services by Large American Manufacturers, the 2002 Survey , 2002, Transportation Journal.

[34]  Jyoti Dhingra Darbari,et al.  An integrated decision making model for the selection of sustainable forward and reverse logistic providers , 2017, Annals of Operations Research.

[35]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach to Interactive Multiobjective Optimization , 2008, Multiobjective Optimization.

[36]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..

[37]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Assessment of third-party logistics provider using multi-criteria decision-making approach based on interval rough numbers , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[38]  P. C. Jha,et al.  Integrating disassembly line balancing in the planning of a reverse logistics network from the perspective of a third party provider , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[39]  Ramesh Anbanandam,et al.  A robust hybrid multi-criteria decision making methodology for contractor evaluation and selection in third-party reverse logistics , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[40]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  Developing a decision model for business process outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[41]  Samarjit Kar,et al.  A rough strength relational DEMATEL model for analysing the key success factors of hospital service quality , 2018 .

[42]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combined DEMATEL technique with hybrid MCDM methods for creating the aspired intelligent global manufacturing & logistics systems , 2011, Annals of Operations Research.

[43]  Tianwei Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Region Boosting method with biased entropy for path planning in changing environment , 2016, CAAI Trans. Intell. Technol..

[44]  Chia-Nan Wang,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Evaluating and Selecting Green Logistics Providers for Sustainable Development , 2017 .

[45]  Wei-Kai Wang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[46]  Milan Milosavljević,et al.  The selection of the railroad container terminal in Serbia based on multi criteria decision making methods , 2018, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.

[47]  Chandra Prakash,et al.  An analysis of integrated robust hybrid model for third-party reverse logistics partner selection under fuzzy environment , 2016 .

[48]  Prasenjit Chatterjee,et al.  A NOVEL HYBRID METHOD FOR NON-TRADITIONAL MACHINING PROCESS SELECTION USING FACTOR RELATIONSHIP AND MULTI-ATTRIBUTIVE BORDER APPROXIMATION METHOD , 2017 .

[49]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  Third-party logistics (3Pls) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model , 2017 .

[50]  Jin Qi,et al.  An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[51]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[52]  Duško Tešić,et al.  A HYBRID FUZZY AHP-MABAC MODEL: APPLICATION IN THE SERBIAN ARMY – THE SELECTION OF THE LOCATION FOR DEEP WADING AS A TECHNIQUE OF CROSSING THE RIVER BY TANKS , 2018 .

[53]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Barriers to the Implementation of Environmentally Oriented Reverse Logistics: Evidence from the Automotive Industry Sector , 2010 .

[54]  Sachin S. Kamble,et al.  3PL evaluation and selection using integrated analytical modeling , 2017 .