Configuration-based processing of phosphene pattern recognition for simulated prosthetic vision.

Visual prosthesis can elicit phosphenes by stimulating the retina, optic nerve, or visual cortex along the visual pathway. Psychophysical studies have demonstrated that visual function can be partly recovered with phosphene-based prosthetic vision. This study investigated the cognitive process of prosthetic vision through a face recognition task. Both behavioral response and the face-specific N170 component of event-related potential were analyzed in the presence of face and non-face stimuli with natural and simulated prosthetic vision. Our results showed that: (i) the accuracy of phosphene face recognition was comparable with that of the normal one when phosphene grid increased to 25 x 21 or more; (ii) shorter response time was needed for phosphene face recognition; and (iii) the N170 component was delayed and enhanced under phosphene stimuli. It was suggested that recognition of phosphene patterns employ a configuration-based holistic processing mechanism with a distinct substage unspecific to faces.

[1]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Facial recognition using simulated prosthetic pixelized vision. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Eimer The face‐specific N170 component reflects late stages in the structural encoding of faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[4]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  K W Horch,et al.  Reading speed with a pixelized vision system. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[8]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[9]  G.J. Suaning,et al.  Effect on prosthetic vision visual acuity by filtering schemes, filter cut-off frequency and phosphene matrix: a virtual reality simulation , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[10]  Mohamad Sawan,et al.  Image processing strategies dedicated to visual cortical stimulators: a survey. , 2005, Artificial organs.

[11]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[12]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Real and virtual mobility performance in simulated prosthetic vision , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  Ying Zhao,et al.  Recognition of pixelized Chinese characters using simulated prosthetic vision. , 2007, Artificial organs.

[14]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[15]  S C Chen,et al.  Visual acuity measurement of prosthetic vision: a virtual-reality simulation study , 2005, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Featural and configural face processing differentially modulate ERP components , 2008, Brain Research.

[17]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetries for Whole-Based and Part-Based Face Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  The fusiform face area is tuned for curvilinear patterns with more high-contrasted elements in the upper part , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  C. Veraart,et al.  Position, size and luminosity of phosphenes generated by direct optic nerve stimulation , 2003, Vision Research.

[22]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Processing the Trees and the Forest during Initial Stages of Face Perception: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Kufta,et al.  Visuotopic mapping through a multichannel stimulating implant in primate V1. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.