Clinical outcomes of patients treated with template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for post-operative recurrent gynecological malignancies: A retrospective analysis

Purpose To report the clinical outcomes in patients treated with Martinez universal perineal interstitial template (MUPIT)-based interstitial brachytherapy boost for primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers, and to perform a comparative analysis with our previously published series of similar patients. Material and methods One hundred and seventeen patients treated between January, 2009 and December, 2015 were evaluated. Descriptive statistics for the patterns of relapse, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicities were carried out. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. All variables with the potential to affect outcomes were tested using log-rank test for statistical significance. Results At a median follow-up of 63 months, LRFS, DFS, and OS at 3/5 years were 77.1%/74.7%, 61%/52%, and 72.3%/63.1%, respectively. Overall treatment time (OTT) of 56 days did not affect outcomes. Bulky tumors and OTT > 63 days adversely affected LRFS. Overall treatment time also significantly impacted DFS and OS. Grade 3-4 late bladder toxicities were observed in 1.7% patients, and grade 3-4 late rectal toxicities in 5% patients. Compared to our previous series, the outcome in the current series is better in terms of severe late toxicities (5% improvement in rectal toxicity, and 2.7% improvement in bladder toxicity) and OS by 10%. This could be attributed to the increasing use of concurrent chemotherapy and relative optimization strategies for organs at risk. Conclusions Patients with primary and recurrent vault and vaginal cancers treated with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost using MUPIT resulted in modest clinical outcomes and acceptable late toxicities. OTT was the most important factor affecting the outcomes.

[1]  K. Stuhr,et al.  The Kelowna template for combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for gynecologic malignancies: Design, application, treatment planning, dosimetric and treatment outcomes. , 2022, Brachytherapy.

[2]  T. Niedermayr,et al.  Applying 3D-Printed Templates in High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer: Simplified Needle Insertion for Optimized Dosimetry. , 2022, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A. Ravi,et al.  Relationship of Urethral Dose and Genitourinary Toxicity Among Patients Receiving Vaginal High Dose Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy. , 2021, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[4]  A. Schernberg,et al.  Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Based Radiation Therapy Response Prediction into Clinical Practice for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients. , 2020, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[5]  Erratum: Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. , 2020, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  Sudeep Gupta,et al.  MRI and PET Guided Interstitial Brachytherapy for post-surgical vaginal recurrences of cervical cancer: Results of phase II study. , 2020, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  R. Bhalavat,et al.  Indian Brachytherapy Society Guidelines for radiotherapeutic management of cervical cancer with special emphasis on high-dose-rate brachytherapy , 2019, Journal of contemporary brachytherapy.

[8]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  Chetan Choithani,et al.  Predictors of hysterectomy among married women 15–49 years in India , 2018, Reproductive Health.

[10]  F. Landoni,et al.  Randomized study between radical surgery and radiotherapy for the treatment of stage IB–IIA cervical cancer: 20-year update , 2017, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[11]  T. Tan,et al.  Feasibility study of toxicity outcomes using GEC-ESTRO contouring guidelines on CT based instead of MRI-based planning in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. , 2017, Brachytherapy.

[12]  C. Ménard,et al.  A prospective study of DWI, DCE-MRI and FDG PET imaging for target delineation in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  E. van Limbergen,et al.  Long term experience with 3D image guided brachytherapy and clinical outcome in cervical cancer patients. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  D. Metzinger,et al.  Computed tomography-planned interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced gynecologic cancer: Outcomes and dosimetric predictors of urinary toxicity. , 2016, Brachytherapy.

[15]  S. Shrivastava,et al.  Late rectal toxicity after image-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for postoperative recurrent and/or residual cervical cancers: EQD2 predictors for Grade ≥II toxicity. , 2015, Brachytherapy.

[16]  C. Fournier,et al.  Occult Invasive Cervical Cancer Found After Inadvertent Simple Hysterectomy: Is the Ideal Management: Systematic Parametrectomy With or Without Radiotherapy or Radiotherapy Only? , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[17]  S. Shrivastava,et al.  Template-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy in gynecologic cancers: a single institutional experience. , 2014, Brachytherapy.

[18]  Robyn Banerjee,et al.  Brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: a review , 2014, International journal of women's health.

[19]  C. Houser,et al.  Urethral dosimetry and toxicity with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[20]  Suparna Ghosh,et al.  A Retrospective Six Years Analysis of Survival and Late Morbidity of Post-operative Gynaecological Malignancy Treated with External Radiotherapy Followed by Brachytherapy in Medical College & Hospitals, Kolkata , 2013, The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.

[21]  R. Phurailatpam,et al.  Evaluation of quality indices during multifractionated pelvic interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer. , 2013, Brachytherapy.

[22]  Umesh Mahantshetty,et al.  Quality assurance of multifractionated pelvic interstitial brachytherapy for postoperative recurrences of cervical cancers: a prospective study. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  J. Rownd,et al.  American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal cancer. , 2012, Brachytherapy.

[24]  Devang C Bhavsar,et al.  Retrospective analysis of role of interstitial brachytherapy using template (MUPIT) in locally advanced gynecological malignancies. , 2007, Journal of cancer research and therapeutics.

[25]  F. Landoni,et al.  Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer , 1997, The Lancet.

[26]  B W Corn,et al.  Improved treatment planning for the Syed-Neblett template using endorectal-coil magnetic resonance and intraoperative (laparotomy/laparoscopy) guidance: a new integrated technique for hysterectomized women with vaginal tumors. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.

[27]  B. Jose,et al.  Posthysterectomy megavoltage irradiation in the treatment of cervical carcinoma. , 1984, Gynecologic oncology.

[28]  A. Martinez,et al.  A multiple-site perineal applicator (MUPIT) for treatment of prostatic, anorectal, and gynecologic malignancies. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.