Inter-laboratory variation in DNA damage using a standard comet assay protocol.

There are substantial inter-laboratory variations in the levels of DNA damage measured by the comet assay. The aim of this study was to investigate whether adherence to a standard comet assay protocol would reduce inter-laboratory variation in reported values of DNA damage. Fourteen laboratories determined the baseline level of DNA strand breaks (SBs)/alkaline labile sites and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG)-sensitive sites in coded samples of mononuclear blood cells (MNBCs) from healthy volunteers. There were technical problems in seven laboratories in adopting the standard protocol, which were not related to the level of experience. Therefore, the inter-laboratory variation in DNA damage was only analysed using the results from laboratories that had obtained complete data with the standard comet assay protocol. This analysis showed that the differences between reported levels of DNA SBs/alkaline labile sites in MNBCs were not reduced by applying the standard assay protocol as compared with the laboratory's own protocol. There was large inter-laboratory variation in FPG-sensitive sites by the laboratory-specific protocol and the variation was reduced when the samples were analysed by the standard protocol. The SBs and FPG-sensitive sites were measured in the same experiment, indicating that the large spread in the latter lesions was the main reason for the reduced inter-laboratory variation. However, it remains worrying that half of the participating laboratories obtained poor results using the standard procedure. This study indicates that future comet assay validation trials should take steps to evaluate the implementation of standard procedures in participating laboratories.

[1]  ESCODD,et al.  Measurement of DNA oxidation in human cells by chromatographic and enzymic methods , 2003 .

[2]  J. Cadet,et al.  Oxidatively generated damage to the guanine moiety of DNA: mechanistic aspects and formation in cells. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[3]  Steffen Loft,et al.  An ECVAG† trial on assessment of oxidative damage to DNA measured by the comet assay , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[4]  Raffaella Corvi,et al.  Reduction of use of animals in regulatory genotoxicity testing: Identification and implementation opportunities-Report from an ECVAM workshop. , 2009, Mutation research.

[5]  Erik Holst,et al.  Sunlight‐induced DNA damage in human mononuclear cells , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[6]  Maria Dusinska,et al.  Measurement of DNA oxidation in human cells by chromatographic and enzymic methods. , 2003, Free radical biology & medicine.

[7]  Alexander Rapp,et al.  Introducing a true internal standard for the Comet assay to minimize intra- and inter-experiment variability in measures of DNA damage and repair , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  A. Collins,et al.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair , 2004, Molecular biotechnology.

[9]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Intra-laboratory Comet Assay Sample Scoring Exercise for Determination of Formamidopyrimidine DNA Glycosylase Sites in Human Mononuclear Blood Cell DNA , 2004, Free radical research.

[10]  A. Collins.  The Comet Assay , 2002 .

[11]  Andreas Czich,et al.  Collaborative study on fifteen compounds in the rat-liver Comet assay integrated into 2- and 4-week repeat-dose studies. , 2010, Mutation research.

[12]  Peter Møller,et al.  Assessment and reduction of comet assay variation in relation to DNA damage: studies from the European Comet Assay Validation Group. , 2010, Mutagenesis.

[13]  Andrew Collins,et al.  Establishing the background level of base oxidation in human lymphocyte DNA: results of an interlaboratory validation study , 2005, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[14]  Escodd.  Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach to consensus. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[15]  R. Tice,et al.  Single cell gel/comet assay: Guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing , 2000, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[16]  Steffen Loft,et al.  Variation in assessment of oxidatively damaged DNA in mononuclear blood cells by the comet assay with visual scoring. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[17]  Raymond R Tice,et al.  Fourth International Workgroup on Genotoxicity testing: results of the in vivo Comet assay workgroup. , 2007, Mutation research.

[18]  J. Lunec,et al.  ESCODD: European Standards Committee on Oxidative DNA Damage. , 1998, Free radical research.

[19]  Leslie Recio,et al.  Improvement of in vivo genotoxicity assessment: combination of acute tests and integration into standard toxicity testing. , 2011, Mutation research.

[20]  David H Phillips,et al.  Variation in the measurement of DNA damage by comet assay measured by the ECVAG inter-laboratory validation trial. , 2010, Mutagenesis.

[21]  M D Waters,et al.  IPCS guidelines for the monitoring of genotoxic effects of carcinogens in humans. International Programme on Chemical Safety. , 2000, Mutation research.

[22]  Peter Møller,et al.  The alkaline comet assay: towards validation in biomonitoring of DNA damaging exposures. , 2006, Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology.

[23]  H. Wichmann,et al.  Validation of a fully automated COMET assay: 1.75 million single cells measured over a 5 year period. , 2011, DNA repair.

[24]  R R Tice,et al.  Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop. , 2003, Mutagenesis.

[25]  Lennart Möller,et al.  The effects on DNA migration of altering parameters in the comet assay protocol such as agarose density, electrophoresis conditions and durations of the enzyme or the alkaline treatments. , 2011, Mutagenesis.

[26]  Gunnar Brunborg,et al.  The comet assay: topical issues. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[27]  Amaya Azqueta,et al.  Towards a more reliable comet assay: optimising agarose concentration, unwinding time and electrophoresis conditions. , 2011, Mutation research.

[28]  G Speit,et al.  The influence of temperature during alkaline treatment and electrophoresis on results obtained with the comet assay. , 1999, Toxicology letters.