Changes in the uncrossed retinotectal projection after removal of the other eye at birth

THE connections between the eyes and the brain are so arranged as to give an orderly representation in the brain, of the visual field. The mechanisms involved in this ordering have been extensively studied, particularly in the retinotectal pathway of submammalian vertebrates1–3. In these species the optic nerves decussate almost completely, retinal ganglion cells in one eye connecting only with the opposite tectum. In mammals, however, there is partial decussation at the optic chiasma, so that the superior colliculus receives optic fibres from both eyes. Binocular representation poses a problem for the ordering of retinotectal projections. If one point on the tectum is to correspond to only one point in visual space, seen through both eyes, the mapping rules onto the tectum must have opposing polarities in the two eyes, along the nasotemporal axis. This is shown in Fig. 1 : a rostral movement in the colliculus corresponds to a temporal movement on the contralateral retina but a nasal movement on the ipsilateral retina. Little is known about the factors determining the topography of the direct ipsilateral projection to the mammalian superior colliculus. Anatomical studies in rodents have shown that neonatal removal of one eye induces an increased projection from the remaining eye to the ipsilateral colliculus4,5. These aberrant uncrossed optic fibres are derived from all regions of the retina and apparently have a distribution appropriate for a normal contralateral projection, that is, the nasotemporal retinal axis is represented caudorostrally6. The only published physiological study investigating the topography (in enucleated rats) confirmed the anatomy as regards the nasotemporal axis but, surprisingly, found the dorsoventral axis reversed over most of the colliculus ipsilateral to the remaining eye7. Here I present results on the enucleated hamster showing that the colliculus ipsilateral to the remaining eye contains a double representation of the visual field displaying mirror-image polarity along the nasotemporal axis.

[1]  T. J. Cunningham Early eye removal produces excessive bilateral branching in the rat: application of cobalt filling method. , 1976, Science.

[2]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Functional organization in the visual cortex of the golden hamster , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  T. Powell,et al.  Interrelationships of striate and extrastriate cortex with the primary relay sites of the visual pathway. , 1968, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  R. Lund Development and Plasticity of the Brain: An Introduction , 1978 .

[5]  G. Schneider,et al.  Topography of visual and somatosensory projections to the superior colliculus of the golden hamster , 1978, Brain Research.

[6]  R. M. Gaze The formation of nerve connections , 1970 .

[7]  K. Straznicky,et al.  Aberrant ipsilateral retinotectal projection following optic nerve section in Xenopus , 1978, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  M. Keating The Formation of Visual Neuronal Connections: An Appraisal of the Present Status of the Theory of “Neuronal Specificity” , 1976 .

[9]  M. Cynader,et al.  Receptive fields in cat superior colliculus after visual cortex lesions. , 1975, Journal of Physiology.

[10]  J. Lund,et al.  The organization of the retinal projection to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in pigmented and albino rats , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  R. Lund The occipitotectal pathway of the rat. , 1966, Journal of anatomy.

[12]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Discontinuous mapping of retina onto tectum innervated by both eyes , 1975, Brain Research.

[13]  R W Guillery,et al.  A study of normal and congenitally abnormal retinogeniculate projections in cats , 1971, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  J. Lund,et al.  Modified optic projections after unilateral eye removal in young rats. , 1973, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[15]  J. Kaas,et al.  Retinocollicular pathways in Siamese cats: an autoradiographic analysis , 1978, Brain Research.

[16]  L. Chalupa,et al.  Responses of visual, somatosensory, and auditory neurones in the golden hamster's superior colliculus , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  Colin Blakemore,et al.  Functional organization in the superior colliculus of the golden hamster , 1976, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  T. J. Cunningham,et al.  Inversion of anomalous uncrossed projections along the mediolateral axis of the superior colliculus: implications for retinocollicular specificity , 1975, Brain Research.

[19]  J. Freeman,et al.  Bilateral ganglion cell branches in the normal rat: A demonstration with electrophysiological collision and cobalt tracing methods , 1977, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  J. Lund,et al.  Plasticity in the developing visual system: The effects of retinal lesions made in young rats , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[21]  R. Lund Variations in the laterality of the central projections of retinal ganglion cells. , 1975, Experimental eye research.