Explicating Net Diversity in Trend Assessment

This study tracks the increasing supply of Internet access and the diversity of Internet use by analyzing data from the three waves of a survey conducted in the United Kingdom in 2005, 2007, and 2009. Data on Internet access and three dimensions of online use (civic-government, economic-commerce, and generic information and news) reveal that the Internet not only offers an emergent promise of diversity but also presents a systematic divide in which the increase in benefits (of Internet capacities and actual consumed) does not uniformly occur, while the impacts of social disparities remain constant over time. Our discussion addresses how characteristics of social backgrounds are salient in harnessing types of Internet use that may be a critical tipping point for information diversity. We argue that policymakers will be better served by understanding the constraint of actual use that is to be in par with the continuous explosion of technological supply.

[1]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The politics of a paradigm shift: Telecommunications regulation and the communications revolution , 1993 .

[2]  E. Hargittai Is Bigger Always Better? Potential Biases of Big Data Derived from Social Network Sites , 2015 .

[3]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[4]  Philip M. Napoli Deconstructing the diversity principle , 1999 .

[5]  E. Hargittai,et al.  THE PARTICIPATION DIVIDE: Content creation and sharing in the digital age1 , 2008 .

[6]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Digital Literacy and Privacy Behavior Online , 2013, Commun. Res..

[7]  Philip M. Napoli Exposure Diversity Reconsidered , 2011, Journal of Information Policy.

[8]  M. Aslama Participation as Position and Practice: Rethinking Media Diversity and Policy in the Web 2.0 Era , 2009 .

[9]  Terry E. Dielman,et al.  Pooled Cross-Sectional and Time Series Data: A Survey of Current Statistical Methodology , 1983 .

[10]  M. Ruffin On being digital. , 1995, Physician executive.

[11]  M. Hindman The Myth of Digital Democracy , 2008 .

[12]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  The future of the mass audience , 1991 .

[13]  Priscilla S. Markwood,et al.  The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More , 2006 .

[14]  Bruce Bimber Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level , 2001 .

[15]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  How new media affords network diversity: Direct and mediated access to social capital through participation in local social settings , 2011, New Media Soc..

[16]  M. Nenova The new Audiovisual Media Services Directive: Television without frontiers, television without cultural diversity , 2007 .

[17]  Erik P. Bucy,et al.  Social Access to the Internet , 1999 .

[18]  Ann E. Schlosser,et al.  The Evolution of the Digital Divide: How Gaps in Internet Access May Impact Electronic Commerce , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[19]  Dirk Fox Online Banking , 2014, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[20]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Internet and Four Dimensions of Citizenship , 2011 .

[21]  Frank Parry,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2003 .

[22]  W. Russell Neuman,et al.  Tracking the Flow of Information into the Home: An Empirical Assessment of the Digital Revolution in the United States, 1960-2005 , 2012 .

[23]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[24]  Nojin Kwak,et al.  Revisiting the Knowledge Gap Hypothesis , 1999 .

[25]  E. Hargittai Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses among Members of the “Net Generation”* , 2010 .

[26]  J. V. Dijk The Evolution of the Digital Divide - The Digital Divide Turns to Inequality of Skills and Usage , 2012 .

[27]  Jen Schradie,et al.  THE TREND OF CLASS, RACE, AND ETHNICITY IN SOCIAL MEDIA INEQUALITY , 2012 .

[28]  Micky Lee INFORMATION AND FINANCE CAPITAL , 2013 .

[29]  J. Freese,et al.  SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF LARGE SOCIAL SURVEYS , 2007 .

[30]  H. Bonfadelli The Internet and Knowledge Gaps , 2002 .

[31]  P. Howard,et al.  Society Online: The Internet in Context , 2003 .

[32]  S. Matei,et al.  Storytelling Neighborhood Paths to Belonging in Diverse Urban Environments , 2001 .

[33]  Nicholas A. Valentino,et al.  Old Times There Are Not Forgotten: Race and Partisan Realignment in the Contemporary South , 2005 .

[34]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[35]  J. A. Calvin Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables , 1998 .

[36]  M. Prior,et al.  News vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout , 2005 .

[37]  I. de Sola Pool Tracking the Flow of Information , 1983, Science.

[38]  Philip M. Napoli Diminished, Enduring, and Emergent Diversity Policy Concerns in an Evolving Media Environment , 2011 .

[39]  R. Wood Society Online: The Internet in Context , 2005 .

[40]  Daniel Kreiss,et al.  The Marketplace of Attention : How Audiences Take Shape in a Digital Age , 2016 .

[41]  Market competition, station ownership, and Local public affairs programming on broadcast television , 2006 .

[42]  S. Mo Jang,et al.  Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  Do men and women differ in privacy? Gendered privacy and (in)equality in the Internet , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[45]  W. R. Neuman,et al.  The Dynamics of Public Attention: Agenda‐Setting Theory Meets Big Data , 2014 .

[46]  Natali Helberger,et al.  From eyeball to creator: toying with audience empowerment in the Audiovisual Media Service Directive , 2008 .

[47]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[48]  Yong Jin Park,et al.  My whole world’s in my palm! The second-level divide of teenagers’ mobile use and skill , 2015, New Media Soc..