TESTS OF DENSITY-DEPENDENT HABITAT SELECTION IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT'

A simple regression analysis can be used to assess the response of animal density to differences in habitat quality. The same test can evaluate general predictions of habitat selection theory as well as search for differences in the shapes of habitat suitability- density functions, something previous tests have been unable to do. Combined with de- mographic or other estimates of fitness, regression tests can provide new insights into the evolution of habitat selection. Regression and fitness tests were used to explore the pattern of density-dependent habitat use in two temperate-zone rodents. The intensity of population regulation appeared to be inversely related to a habitat's carrying capacity. Variation in density-dependent habitat choice suggests new and unexpected dispersal strategies that vary with habitat heterogeneity. The predictions of the theory are complicated when habitat quality varies independently of population density. Sweepstake fitness rewards may be reaped by animals that would previously have been assumed to have made a suboptimal habitat choice. At the level of microhabitat, habitat selection models appeared to be much less capable of predicting variation in population density. Such a relation could be due to complex and inverse relationships between microhabitat quality and carrying capacity, or it could simply reflect scaling patterns in habitat selection.

[1]  J. Emlen The Assessment of Frequency- and Density-Dependent Influences on Fitness in Natural Populations , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[2]  G. Svärdson Competition and Habitat Selection in Birds , 1949 .

[3]  S. Fretwell Populations in a seasonal environment. , 1973, Monographs in population biology.

[4]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[5]  C. Krebs Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance , 1973 .

[6]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[7]  Stuart L. Pimm,et al.  Competitors and habitat use , 1981 .

[8]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  The Nature of the Taxon Cycle in the Melanesian Ant Fauna , 1961, The American Naturalist.

[9]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Detecting Density-Dependent Habitat Selection , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[10]  C. Krebs,et al.  On the reliability of enumeration for mark and recapture census of voles , 1976 .

[11]  Allan Stewart-Oaten,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT: "PSEUDOREPLICATION" IN TIME?' , 1986 .

[12]  R. Holt Population dynamics in two-patch environments: Some anomalous consequences of an optimal habitat distribution , 1985 .

[13]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[14]  P. Grant Population performance of Microtus pennsylvanicus confined to woodland habitat, and a model of habitat occupancy , 1975 .

[15]  M. V. Price Microhabitat Use in Rodent Communities: Predator Avoidance or Foraging Economics? , 1983 .

[16]  T. Whitham The Theory of Habitat Selection: Examined and Extended Using Pemphigus Aphids , 1980, The American Naturalist.

[17]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Centrifugal community organization , 1986 .

[18]  D. Fraser,et al.  Observations on Stream Minnows in a Patchy Environment: A Test of a Theory of Habitat Distribution , 1980 .