Corporate Environmental Disclosure: Contrasting Management's Perceptions with Reality

This paper's purpose is to assess how management's perceptions regarding certain aspects of environmental reporting relate to the firm's actual reporting strategy. Toward that end, we propose a model where a firm's environmental disclosure is conditional upon executive assessments of corporate concerns. The study relies on a survey that was sent to environmental management executives from European and North American multinational firms enquiring about the determinants of corporate environmental disclosure. Responses from these executives were then contrasted with their firms' actual environmental reporting practices, which was measured using a comprehensive multi-criteria grid. Results show that there is a relationship between environmental managers' attitudes toward various stakeholder groups and how those managers respond to the stakeholders via the decision to disclose and the actual disclosures made. Our model provides a perspective as to how a firm responds to the numerous stakeholders to whom it must be accountable. This accountability in turn relates to how the company communicates its actions to society in order to achieve or maintain its social legitimacy.

[1]  F. Birkin,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision1 , 1996 .

[2]  Baruch Lev,et al.  Information Disclosure Strategy , 1992 .

[3]  Hussein A. Warsame,et al.  Managing Public Impressions: Environmental Disclosures in Annual Reports , 1998 .

[4]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .

[5]  Nola Buhr Environmental performance, legislation and annual report disclosure: the case of acid rain and Falconbridge , 1998 .

[6]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[7]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[8]  A. Schaefer,et al.  Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities , 2001 .

[9]  R. Gray,et al.  Corporate social and environmental reporting , 1995 .

[10]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[11]  D. Cormier,et al.  Corporate Environmental Disclosure Strategies: Determinants, Costs and Benefits , 1999 .

[12]  Denis Cormier,et al.  Investors' assessment of implicit environmental liabilities: An empirical investigation , 1997 .

[13]  M. Mathews Towards a Mega-Theory of Accounting , 1997 .

[14]  D. Cormier,et al.  An examination of social and environmental reporting strategies , 2001 .

[15]  Michael Welker,et al.  Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital , 2001 .

[16]  Sarah Golden,et al.  Corporate environmental disclosures: are they useful in determining environmental performance? , 2001 .

[17]  J. Mahon,et al.  The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate , 1997 .

[18]  Martin Freedman,et al.  An investigation of the long-run relationship between pollution performance and economic performance: The case of pulp and paper firms , 1992 .

[19]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[20]  Perry Sadorsky,et al.  The Relationship Between Environmental Commitment and Managerial Perceptions of Stakeholder Importance , 1999 .

[21]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Organizational Legitimacy , 1975 .

[22]  Jay J. Janney,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective , 2001 .

[23]  Geoffrey Frost,et al.  Corporate environmental reporting: A test of legitimacy theory , 2000 .

[24]  Steven N. Brenner,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Theory and Research , 1991 .

[25]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance , 1999 .

[26]  L. Parker,et al.  Corporate Social Reporting: A Rebuttal of Legitimacy Theory , 1989 .

[27]  B. Husted Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations , 1998 .

[28]  D. Cormier,et al.  Environmental reporting management: a continental European perspective , 2003 .

[29]  C. Deegan,et al.  The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory , 1998 .

[30]  Dennis M. Patten INTRA-INDUSTRY ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURES IN RESPONSE TO THE ALASKAN OIL SPILL: A NOTE ON... , 1992 .

[31]  R. Roberts,et al.  Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory , 1992 .

[32]  David Yermack,et al.  Do Corporations Award CEO Stock Options Effectively , 1994 .

[33]  Gerald E. Fryxell,et al.  CEO Stakeholder Attitudes and Corporate Social Activity in the Fortune 500 , 1994 .