A dehumidification system for low gravity plant growth experiments requires the generation of no free-liquid condensate and the recovery of water for reuse. In the systems discussed in this paper, the membrane is a barrier between the humid air phase and a liquid-coolant water phase. The coolant water temperature combined with a transmembrane pressure differential establishes a water flux from the humid air into the coolant water. Building on the work of others, we directly compared different hydrophilic membranes for humidity control. In a direct comparison of the hydrophilic membranes, hollow fiber cellulose ester membranes were superior to metal and ceramic membranes in the categories of condensation flux per surface area, ease of start-up, and stability. However, cellulose ester membranes were inferior to metal membranes in one significant category, durability. Dehumidification systems using mixed cellulose ester membranes failed after operational times of only hours to days. We propose that the ratio of fluid surface area to membrane material area (approximately = membrane porosity) controls the relative performances among membranes. In addition, we clarified design equations for operational parameters such as the transmembrane pressure differential. This technology has several potential benefits related to earth environmental issues including the minimization of airborne pathogen release and higher energy efficiency in air conditioning equipment. Utilizing these study results, we designed, constructed, and flew on the space shuttle missions a membrane-based dehumidification system for a plant growth chamber.
[1]
D. D. Newbold.
Analysis of a Membrane-Based Condensate Recovery Heat Exchanger (CRX)
,
1993
.
[2]
Giulio C. Sarti,et al.
Separation efficiency in vacuum membrane distillation
,
1992
.
[3]
Neil A. Duffie,et al.
Humidity and Temperature Control in the ASTROCULTURE™ Flight Experiment
,
1994
.
[4]
A. L. London,et al.
COMPACT HEAT EXCHANGERS--A SUMMARY OF BASIC HEAT TRANSFER AND FLOW FRICTION DESIGN DATA. T.O.6, Technical Report No. 23
,
1954
.
[5]
Scott B. McCray,et al.
PERFORMANCE OF A MEMBRANE-BASED CONDENSATE-RECOVERY HEAT EXCHANGER
,
1996
.
[6]
Alex Hoehn,et al.
Plant Generic Bioprocessing Apparatus: A Plant Growth Facility for Space Flight Biotechnology Research
,
1996
.