Controller workload is a key factor in limiting en route air traffic capacity. Past efforts to quantify and predict workload have resulted in identifying objective metrics that correlate well with subjective workload ratings during current air traffic control operations. Although these metrics provide a reasonable statistical fit to existing data, they do not provide a good mechanism for estimating controller workload for future air traffic concepts and environments that make different assumptions about automation, enabling technologies, and controller tasks. One such future environment is characterized by en route airspace with a mixture of aircraft equipped with and without Data Communications (Data Comm). In this environment, aircraft with Data Comm will impact controller workload less than aircraft requiring voice communication, altering the close correlation between aircraft count and controller workload that exists in current air traffic operations. This paper outlines a new trajectory-based complexity (TBX) calculation that was presented to controllers during a human-in-the-loop simulation. The results showed that TBX accurately estimated the workload in a mixed Data Comm equipage environment and the resulting complexity values were understood and readily interpreted by the controllers. The complexity was represented as a “modified aircraft count” that weighted different complexity factors and summed them in such a way that the controllers could effectively treat them as aircraft count. The factors were also relatively easy to tune without an extensive data set. The results showed that the TBX approach is well suited for presenting traffic complexity in future air traffic environments.
[1]
Thomas Prevot,et al.
Trajectory-Based Complexity (TBX): A modified aircraft count to predict sector complexity during trajectory-based operations
,
2011,
2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
[2]
B. Hilburn.
Modeling Cognitive Complexity in Air Traffic Control: Eurocontrol’s Coca Approach
,
2005,
24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.
[3]
Angela Kessell,et al.
A Human-in-the-Loop Evaluation of Flow-Based Trajectory Management in Mixed Equipage Airspace
,
2011
.
[4]
Anthony J. Masalonis,et al.
DYNAMIC DENSITY AND COMPLEXITY METRICS FOR REALTIME TRAFFIC FLOW MANAGEMENT
,
2003
.
[5]
Michael Bloem,et al.
A Robust Approach for Predicting Dynamic Density
,
2009
.
[6]
Jonathan Histon,et al.
Mitigating complexity in Air Traffic Control : the role of structure-based abstractions
,
2008
.
[7]
Banavar Sridhar,et al.
Measures for air traffic controller workload prediction
,
2001
.