Similarity After Goodman

In a famous critique, Goodman dismissed similarity as a slippery and both philosophically and scientifically useless notion. We revisit his critique in the light of important recent work on similarity in psychology and cognitive science. Specifically, we use Tversky’s influential set-theoretic account of similarity as well as Gärdenfors’s more recent resuscitation of the geometrical account to show that, while Goodman’s critique contained valuable insights, it does not warrant a dismissal of similarity.

[1]  Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen,et al.  Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe , 1923 .

[2]  N. Goodman,et al.  The Structure of Appearance. , 1953 .

[3]  C. Coombs.  A method for the study of interstimulus similarity , 1954 .

[4]  P. Hofstaetter.  [Similarity]. , 2020, Psyche.

[5]  N. Goodman.  Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , 1955 .

[6]  R. Shepard.  Stimulus and response generalization: tests of a model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[8]  W. Torgerson,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of similarity , 1965, Psychometrika.

[9]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap , 1966 .

[10]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[11]  N. Goodman.  Problems and projects , 1979 .

[12]  E. Holman.  Monotonic models for asymmetric proximities , 1979 .

[13]  Bas C. van Fraassen,et al.  The Scientific Image , 1980 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. , 1982, Psychological review.

[15]  A Study Of Qualities , 1990 .

[16]  R. Nosofsky.  Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  K. Korb.  Explaining Science* , 1991, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[18]  D. Gentner,et al.  Respects for similarity , 1993 .

[19]  J. Hampton.  Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories , 1998, Cognition.

[20]  M. Johannesson.  Modelling asymmetric similarity with prominence. , 2000, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[21]  R. Shepard.  Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[22]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2005 .

[23]  W. Meijs.  Probabilistic Measures of Coherence , 2005 .

[24]  C. Krumhansl.  Concerning the Applicability of Geometric Models to Similarity Data : The Interrelationship Between Similarity and Spatial Density , 2005 .

[25]  L. Decock.  A physicalist reinterpretion of ‘phenomenal’ spaces , 2006 .

[26]  James A. Hampton,et al.  Typicality, Graded Membership, and Vagueness , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[27]  Hannes Leitgeb,et al.  A New Analysis of Quasianalysis , 2007, J. Philos. Log..

[28]  Penelope Maddy,et al.  The logical structure of the world , 2007 .

[29]  Thomas Mormann,et al.  New Work for Carnap’s Quasi-Analysis , 2009, J. Philos. Log..

[30]  L. Basso.  G. W. Leibniz, "Politische Schriften", in Id., "Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe", Vierte Reihe, Sechster Band. 1695-1697, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 2008. , 2009 .

[31]  I. Douven,et al.  Identity and similarity , 2010 .

[32]  Alexander Bird,et al.  Natural Kinds , 1988, Philosophy.

[33]  Igor Douven,et al.  Vagueness: A Conceptual Spaces Approach , 2011, Journal of Philosophical Logic.