Neural correlates of binding features within- or cross-dimensions in visual conjunction search: An fMRI study
暂无分享,去创建一个
Hermann J. Müller | Xiaolin Zhou | Stefan Pollmann | Ping Wei | H. Müller | S. Pollmann | Xiaolin Zhou | P. Wei | Ping Wei
[1] Arno Villringer,et al. Visual Feature and Conjunction Searches of Equal Difficulty Engage Only Partially Overlapping Frontoparietal Networks , 2002, NeuroImage.
[2] N. Kanwisher,et al. The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.
[3] Stefan Pollmann,et al. Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models , 2003, Psychological research.
[4] C. D. Frith,et al. Brain Activations during Visual Search: Contributions of Search Efficiency versus Feature Binding , 2003, NeuroImage.
[5] John C Gore,et al. The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[6] Richard A. Andersen,et al. Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.
[7] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[8] Gisela Müller-Plath,et al. Localizing subprocesses of visual search by correlating local brain activation in fMRI with response time model parameters , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[9] Jeffrey D. Schall,et al. Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.
[10] Jan Theeuwes,et al. SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .
[11] G. Humphreys. A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence , 2001 .
[12] Karl J. Friston,et al. Conjunction revisited , 2005, NeuroImage.
[13] H. J. Muller,et al. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.
[14] Jesper Andersson,et al. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.
[15] Karl J. Friston,et al. Functional Anatomy of Visual Search: Regional Segregations within the Frontal Eye Fields and Effective Connectivity of the Superior Colliculus , 2002, NeuroImage.
[16] G. Humphreys,et al. Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence from reversed search efficiencies. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] J. Gottlieb. From Thought to Action: The Parietal Cortex as a Bridge between Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2007, Neuron.
[18] J. Duncan,et al. Attention and reading: Wholes and parts in shape recognition: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[19] Richard N. A. Henson,et al. The Effects of Interdistracter Similarity on Search Processes in Superior Parietal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.
[20] Zhuanghua Shi,et al. Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[21] B. Gold,et al. Common and Distinct Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility in Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[22] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.
[23] A Treisman,et al. Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[24] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[25] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] G. R. Mangun,et al. A Role for Top-Down Attentional Orienting during Interference between Global and Local Aspects of Hierarchical Stimuli , 2002, NeuroImage.
[27] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[28] A. Treisman,et al. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.
[29] Hermann J. Müller,et al. Neural basis of interaction between target presence and display homogeneity in visual search: An fMRI study , 2009, NeuroImage.
[30] R A Andersen,et al. Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[31] Arno Villringer,et al. Parietal activation during visual search in the absence of multiple distractors , 2003, Neuroreport.
[32] M. Rushworth,et al. Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[33] J. Wolfe,et al. Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features , 2000, Vision Research.
[34] M. Coltheart. Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .
[35] P. Cavanagh,et al. Visual Search for Feature and Conjunction Targets with an Attention Deficit , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[36] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.
[37] R. Andersen,et al. Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review , 2000, Vision Research.
[38] G. Humphreys,et al. Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] M. Corbetta,et al. Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.
[40] J. Danckert. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[41] Karl J. Friston,et al. Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.
[42] G. Orban,et al. Attention Mechanisms in Visual SearchAn fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[43] Alan Cowey,et al. Does parietal cortex contribute to feature binding? , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[44] M. Goodale,et al. Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.
[45] Vincent Walsh,et al. Distinct neural substrates for visual search amongst spatial versus temporal distractors. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[46] A. Villringer,et al. Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.
[47] Karl J. Friston,et al. Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.
[48] C. Colby,et al. Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[49] Steven J Luck,et al. Rapid Development of Feature Binding in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2006, Psychological science.