Neural correlates of binding features within- or cross-dimensions in visual conjunction search: An fMRI study

The fMRI technique was used to investigate the functional neuroanatomy of binding features within- or cross-dimension during visual conjunction search. Participants were asked to perform feature search (FS; e.g., search for a vertical bar among tilted bars), within-dimension search (WS; e.g., search for an upright T among non-target oriented Ts and Ls), cross-dimension search (CS; e.g., search for an orange vertical bar among blue vertical bars and orange tilted bars), and complex search combining within- and cross-dimension features (WCS; e.g., search for an orange upright T among orange leftward Ts and blue Ls). Reaction times (RTs) taken to decide whether a target was present or absent were faster in the FS than in the WS, CS, and WCS conditions, but did not differ between the latter three conditions. Neuroimaging results revealed a set of fronto-parietal regions, including frontal eye field and intraparietal sulcus, to be consistently activated in conjunction search (WS, CS, and WCS) relative to feature search, suggesting that these regions play a more prominent role in matching visual input against the target template in conjunction search. Furthermore, left occipito-temporal cortex was more activated in within-dimension conjunction search, and bilateral intraparietal sulci were more activated in cross-dimension conjunction search. This suggests that features from the same dimension are 'bound' at a higher stage of the ventral pathway by conjoining the inputs from lower-level neurons, whereas neurons along the intraparietal sulcus appear to be necessary for discerning the presence of cross-dimensional conjunctions.

[1]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Visual Feature and Conjunction Searches of Equal Difficulty Engage Only Partially Overlapping Frontoparietal Networks , 2002, NeuroImage.

[2]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[3]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Determining subprocesses of visual feature search with reaction time models , 2003, Psychological research.

[4]  C. D. Frith,et al.  Brain Activations during Visual Search: Contributions of Search Efficiency versus Feature Binding , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  John C Gore,et al.  The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  Separate body- and world-referenced representations of visual space in parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[7]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Gisela Müller-Plath,et al.  Localizing subprocesses of visual search by correlating local brain activation in fMRI with response time model parameters , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Effect of target-distractor similarity on FEF visual selection in the absence of the target , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[11]  G. Humphreys A multi-stage account of binding in vision: Neuropsychological evidence , 2001 .

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Conjunction revisited , 2005, NeuroImage.

[13]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visual Search: Regional Segregations within the Frontal Eye Fields and Effective Connectivity of the Superior Colliculus , 2002, NeuroImage.

[16]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence from reversed search efficiencies. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  J. Gottlieb From Thought to Action: The Parietal Cortex as a Bridge between Perception, Action, and Cognition , 2007, Neuron.

[18]  J. Duncan,et al.  Attention and reading: Wholes and parts in shape recognition: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[19]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  The Effects of Interdistracter Similarity on Search Processes in Superior Parietal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[20]  Zhuanghua Shi,et al.  Contextual cueing in multiconjunction visual search is dependent on color- and configuration-based intertrial contingencies. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  B. Gold,et al.  Common and Distinct Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility in Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[25]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe detection analysis of preview search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  A Role for Top-Down Attentional Orienting during Interference between Global and Local Aspects of Hierarchical Stimuli , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[29]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  Neural basis of interaction between target presence and display homogeneity in visual search: An fMRI study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[30]  R A Andersen,et al.  Multimodal integration for the representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[31]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Parietal activation during visual search in the absence of multiple distractors , 2003, Neuroreport.

[32]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Attention Systems and the Organization of the Human Parietal Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Fractionating the binding process: neuropsychological evidence distinguishing binding of form from binding of surface features , 2000, Vision Research.

[34]  M. Coltheart Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[35]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Visual Search for Feature and Conjunction Targets with an Attention Deficit , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review , 2000, Vision Research.

[38]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Dissociating the neural mechanisms of memory-based guidance of visual selection , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[40]  J. Danckert Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action: Attention and Performance XIX Wolfgang Prinz, Bernhard Hommel (Eds.), Oxford University Press, 2002, Price: £ 65.00, ISBN: 0-19-851069 , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[42]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention Mechanisms in Visual SearchAn fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Does parietal cortex contribute to feature binding? , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[45]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  Distinct neural substrates for visual search amongst spatial versus temporal distractors. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[46]  A. Villringer,et al.  Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[47]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[48]  C. Colby,et al.  Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Rapid Development of Feature Binding in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2006, Psychological science.