Comparison of dose at an interventional reference point between the displayed estimated value and measured value

Today, interventional radiology (IR) X-ray units are required for display of doses at an interventional reference point (IRP) for the operator (IR physician). The dose displayed at the IRP (the reference dose) of an X-ray unit has been reported to be helpful for characterizing patient exposure in real time. However, no detailed report has evaluated the accuracy of the reference doses displayed on X-ray equipment. Thus, in this study, we compared the displayed reference dose to the actual measured value in many IR X-ray systems. Although the displayed reference doses of many IR X-ray systems agreed with the measured actual values within approximately 15%, the doses of a few IR units were not close. Furthermore, some X-ray units made in Japan displayed reference doses quite different from the actual measured value, probably because the reference point of these units differs from the International Electrotechnical Commission standard. Thus, IR physicians should pay attention to the location of the IRP of the displayed reference dose in Japan. Furthermore, physicians should be aware of the accuracy of the displayed reference dose of the X-ray system that they use for IR. Thus, regular checks of the displayed reference dose of the X-ray system are important.

[1]  Jason P. Rehm,et al.  Radiation Injury from a Fluoroscopic Procedure , 2004 .

[2]  R. Morin,et al.  Ionizing Radiation in Cardiac Imaging: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention , 2009, Circulation.

[3]  Stephen Balter,et al.  Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients' skin and hair. , 2010, Radiology.

[4]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Stephen Balter,et al.  ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task , 2005, Circulation.

[7]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of maximum radiation dose to the skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  Koichi Chida,et al.  Evaluating the maximum patient radiation dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  Donald L. Miller,et al.  Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review. , 2009, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  K. Chida,et al.  Clarifying and visualizing sources of staff-received scattered radiation in interventional procedures. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  T. Ishibashi,et al.  Radiation dose and radiation protection for patients and physicians during interventional procedure. , 2010, Journal of radiation research.

[12]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Evaluating the performance of a MOSFET dosimeter at diagnostic X-ray energies for interventional radiology , 2009, Radiological physics and technology.

[13]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Does digital acquisition reduce patients' skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  J. Valentin,et al.  Abstract: Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, ICRP Publication 85 , 2000 .

[15]  Y. Katahira,et al.  Evaluation of additional lead shielding in protecting the physician from radiation during cardiac interventional procedures. , 2005, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.

[16]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Comparison of the radiation dose in a cardiac IVR X-ray system. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[17]  Virginia Tsapaki,et al.  Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  Masayuki Zuguchi,et al.  Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  T. Ishibashi,et al.  Optimizing patient radiation dose in intervention procedures , 2010, Acta radiologica.