Social robots for older users: a possibility to support assessment and social interventions

In the last decades, various researches in the field of robotics have created numerous opportunities for innovative support of the older population. The goal of this work was to review and highlight how social robots can help the daily life of older people, and be useful also as assessment tools. We will underline the aspects of usability and acceptability of robotic supports in the psychosocial work with older persons. The actual usability of the system influences the perception of the ease of use only when the user has no or low experience, while expert users’ perception is related to their attitude towards the robot. This finding should be more deeply analysed because it may have a strong influence on the design of future interfaces for elderly-robot interaction. Robots can play an important role to tackle the societal challenge of the growing older population. The authors report some recent studies with older users, where it was demonstrated that the acceptability of robotics during daily life activities, and also in cognitive evaluation, could be supported by social robots

[1]  Silvia Rossi,et al.  Psychometric Evaluation Supported by a Social Robot: Personality Factors and Technology Acceptance , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[2]  B. MacDonald,et al.  The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[3]  Kiseon Kim,et al.  A review on application of technology systems, standards and interfaces for agriculture and food sector , 2013, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[4]  Catherine J. Stevens,et al.  A review of the applicability of robots in education , 2013 .

[5]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Why Some Humanoid Faces Are Perceived More Positively Than Others: Effects of Human-Likeness and Task , 2014, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[6]  Alessandro G. Di Nuovo,et al.  Robots in Education and Care of Children with Developmental Disabilities: A Study on Acceptance by Experienced and Future Professionals , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[7]  John Hudson,et al.  People’s Attitudes to Robots in Caring for the Elderly , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  Silvia Coradeschi,et al.  A Review of Mobile Robotic Telepresence , 2013, Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  S. Buono,et al.  Personality factors and acceptability of socially assistive robotics in teachers with and without specialized training for children with disability , 2017 .

[10]  J. Manyika,et al.  Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy , 2013 .

[11]  Jaemin Jung,et al.  Intrusion of software robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists , 2017, Computers in Human Behavior.

[12]  Torbjørn S. Dahl,et al.  Robots in Health and Social Care: A Complementary Technology to Home Care and Telehealthcare? , 2013, Robotics.

[13]  Barbara Klein,et al.  Acceptance of Social Robots by Elder People: Does Psychosocial Functioning Matter? , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[14]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  International Governance of Autonomous Military Robots , 2010 .

[15]  Malte F. Jung,et al.  Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[16]  Alessandro G. Di Nuovo,et al.  Deep Learning Systems for Estimating Visual Attention in Robot-Assisted Therapy of Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability , 2018, Robotics.

[17]  T. Kanda,et al.  Analysis of Humanoid Appearances in Human-robot Interaction , 2006 .

[18]  V. Ozben,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2019, Springer International Publishing.

[19]  J. Wardle,et al.  Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  Ning Wang,et al.  The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly , 2017, Intelligent Service Robotics.

[22]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[23]  Leopoldina Fortunati,et al.  Robot Shift from Industrial Production to Social Reproduction , 2015 .

[24]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[25]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Robotic Services Acceptance in Smart Environments With Older Adults: User Satisfaction and Acceptability Study , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[27]  Alessandro G. Di Nuovo,et al.  A Social Robot for Cognitive Assessment , 2018, HRI.

[28]  Juan Fasola,et al.  A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly , 2013, J. Hum. Robot Interact..

[29]  Jamy Li,et al.  The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .