Radioactive Seed Localization With 125I For Nonpalpable Lesions Prior to Breast Lumpectomy and/or Excisional Biopsy: Methodology, Safety, and Experience of Initial Year

AbstractThe use of radioactive seed localization (RSL) as an alternative to wire localizations (WL) for nonpalpable breast lesions is rapidly gaining acceptance because of its advantages for both the patient and the surgical staff. This paper examines the initial experience with over 1,200 patients seen at a comprehensive cancer center. Radiation safety procedures for radiology, surgery, and pathology were implemented, and radioactive material inventory control was maintained using an intranet-based program. Surgical probes allowed for discrimination between 125I seed photon energies from 99mTc administered for sentinel node testing. A total of 1,127 patients (median age of 57.2 y) underwent RSL procedures with 1,223 seeds implanted. Implanted seed depth ranged from 10.3–107.8 mm. The median length of time from RSL implant to surgical excision was 2 d. The median 125I activity at time of implant was 3.1 MBq (1.9 to 4.6). The median dose rate from patients with a single seed was 9.5 &mgr;Sv h−1 and 0.5 &mgr;Sv h−1 at contact and 1 m, respectively. The maximum contact dose rate was 187 &mgr;Sv h−1 from a superficially placed seed. RSL performed greater than 1 d before surgery is a viable alternative to WL, allowing flexibility in scheduling, minimizing day of surgery procedures, and improving workflow in breast imaging and surgery. RSL has been shown to be a safe and effective procedure for preoperative localization under mammographic and ultrasound guidance, which can be managed with the use of customized radiation protection controls.

[1]  O. Nieweg,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy. , 2014, Australian family physician.

[2]  Jennifer D. Brooks,et al.  Safety and efficacy of radioactive seed localization with I-125 prior to lumpectomy and/or excisional biopsy. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[3]  E. Morris,et al.  Radioactive Seed Localization Compared to Wire Localization in Breast-Conserving Surgery: Initial 6-Month Experience , 2013, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[4]  J. Groenewoud,et al.  Impact of transition from analog screening mammography to digital screening mammography on screening outcome in The Netherlands: a population-based study. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  L. Philpotts,et al.  Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. , 2012, Radiology.

[6]  Kenneth G A Gilhuijs,et al.  Radioactive Seed Localization of Breast Lesions: An Adequate Localization Method without Seed Migration , 2011, The breast journal.

[7]  Nabil Wasif,et al.  Radioactive Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Review of 1,000 Consecutive Procedures at a Single Institution , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[8]  Mohammed Keshtgar,et al.  Strategies for localisation of impalpable breast lesions. , 2011, Breast.

[9]  S. Heller,et al.  Nuclear probes and intraoperative gamma cameras. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  Systematic review of radioguided surgery for non-palpable breast cancer. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  C. Goldsmith,et al.  A Multicentered, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Radioguided Seed Localization to Standard Wire Localization for Nonpalpable, Invasive and in situ Breast Carcinomas , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[12]  G. Nieuwenhuijzen,et al.  Localization of non‐palpable breast cancer using a radiolabelled titanium seed , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  M. Ulissey,et al.  Experience with Seed Localization for Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in a Public Health Care System , 2010, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[14]  Y. Yamada,et al.  Less-restrictive, patient-specific radiation safety precautions can be safely prescribed after permanent seed implantation. , 2010, Brachytherapy.

[15]  Richard J Gray,et al.  Current status of radioactive seed for localization of non palpable breast lesions. , 2010, American journal of surgery.

[16]  M. Fraile,et al.  Radioguided localization of nonpalpable breast cancer lesions: randomized comparison with wire localization in patients undergoing conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  Potential for Contamination during Removal of Radioactive Seeds from Surgically Excised Tissue , 2009, Health physics.

[18]  Michael V Knopp,et al.  A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology , 2009, World journal of surgical oncology.

[19]  S. Mclaughlin,et al.  A Multi‐site Validation Trial of Radioactive Seed Localization as an Alternative to Wire Localization , 2008, The breast journal.

[20]  A. Giuliano,et al.  Radioguided surgery : a comprehensive team approach , 2008 .

[21]  P. Karstaedt,et al.  Radiation safety with use of I-125 seeds for localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[22]  L. Dauer,et al.  Organ and fetal absorbed dose estimates from 99mTc-sulfur colloid lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel node localization in breast cancer patients. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  R. Audisio,et al.  Occult breast lesions: A comparison between radioguided occult lesion localisation (ROLL) vs. wire-guided lumpectomy (WGL). , 2005, Breast.

[24]  P. Karstaedt,et al.  Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[25]  M. Kerin,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  A. O'Doherty,et al.  Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery. , 2004, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[27]  A. Meigooni,et al.  A Monte Carlo evaluation of the dosimetric characteristics of the Best Model 2301 125I brachytherapy source. , 2002, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[28]  M. Hočevar,et al.  Breast biopsy with wire localization: factors influencing complete excision of nonpalpable carcinoma , 2002, European Radiology.

[29]  I. Barillot,et al.  Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  J. Friedland,et al.  Randomized Prospective Evaluation of a Novel Technique for Biopsy or Lumpectomy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Radioactive Seed Versus Wire Localization , 2001, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[31]  Richard Sposto,et al.  Palpable Breast Cancers Are Inherently Different From Nonpalpable Breast Cancers , 2001, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[32]  R. J. Brenner,et al.  Wire fragments after needle localization. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  J. G. Schuler,et al.  The new era in breast cancer. Invasion, size, and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. , 1996, Archives of surgery.

[34]  D B Kopans,et al.  Migration of breast biopsy localization wire. , 1988, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  R. Kilcoyne,et al.  Complications of needle localization of foreign bodies and nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1988, Archives of surgery.

[36]  M. Homer Transection of the localization hooked wire during breast biopsy. , 1983, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[37]  J. Harris,et al.  Primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer: the experience at The Joint Center for Radiation Therapy. , 1981, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  M. Steer,et al.  Preoperative localization of nonpalpable breast lesions demonstrated by mammography. , 1976, The New England journal of medicine.