Exploring Reductions in London Underground Passenger Journeys Following the July 2005 Bombings

We examine the reduction in London Underground passenger journeys in response to the July 2005 bombings. Using entrance data for London Underground stations between 2001 and 2007, we incorporate demand and supply factors in a multivariate time-series regression model to estimate changes in passenger journeys between different Underground lines. We find that passenger journeys fell by an average of 8.3% for the 4 months following the attacks. This amounts to an overall reduction of 22.5 million passenger journeys for that period. Passenger journeys returned to predicted levels during September 2005, yet we find evidence of reduced travel until June 2006. Our estimates controlled for other factors, including reduced Underground service provision due to damage from the attacks, economic conditions, and weather, yet substantial reductions in passenger journeys remained. Around 82% of passenger journey reductions following the 2005 attacks cannot be attributed to supply-side factors or demand-side factors such as economic conditions, weather, or the summer school-break alone. We suggest that this reduction may partially be due to an increased perception of the risk of Underground travel after the attacks.

[1]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[2]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Travel Risks in a Time of Terror: Judgments and Choices , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Diffusion of Fear: Modeling Community Response to a Terrorist Strike , 2007 .

[4]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Out of the Frying Pan into the Fire: Behavioral Reactions to Terrorist Attacks , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Harumi Ito,et al.  Assessing the impact of the September 11 terrorist attacks on U.S. airline demand , 2004, Journal of Economics and Business.

[6]  Alejandro López-Rousseau Avoiding the Death Risk of Avoiding a Dread Risk , 2005, Psychological science.

[7]  K. Mccaul,et al.  Perceived Risk and Worry: The Effects of 9/11 on Willingness to Fly1 , 2004 .

[8]  Andrew Cox,et al.  Transportation security and the role of resilience: A foundation for operational metrics , 2011 .

[9]  Daniel H. Simon,et al.  The Impact of 9/11 on Road Fatalities: The Other Lives Lost to Terrorism , 2005 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[11]  Jumpei Ichinosawa Reputational disaster in Phuket: the secondary impact of the tsunami on inbound tourism , 2006 .

[12]  Michael D. Intriligator,et al.  Econometric Models, Techniques, and Applications. , 1979 .

[13]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Cognitive Components of Risk Ratings , 1981 .

[14]  Peter Gordon,et al.  The Economic Impacts of a Terrorist Attack on the U.S. Commercial Aviation System , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[15]  S. Gaines,et al.  Terror threat perception and its consequences in contemporary Britain. , 2005, British journal of psychology.

[16]  C. Brewin,et al.  Enduring consequences of terrorism: 7-month follow-up survey of reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005 , 2007, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[17]  C. Brewin,et al.  Psychological and behavioural reactions to the bombings in London on 7 July 2005: cross sectional survey of a representative sample of Londoners , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[19]  L Sjöberg,et al.  Worry and Risk Perception , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Barbara Fasolo From Describing to Nudging: Choice of Transportation aft er a Terrorist Att ack in London , 2009 .

[21]  M Sivack,et al.  FLYING AND DRIVING AFTER THE SEPTEMBER 11 ATTACKS , 2002 .