Hazards, vulnerability and interactions at construction sites: spatial risk mapping

Construction sites contain several supporting facilities that are required to perform construction activities. These facilities may be exposed to several hazards. This may lead to adverse consequences for the whole construction process, which in turn lead to fatal accidents that have a major impact on worker and employee productivity, project completion time, project quality and project budget. This paper proposes a framework to visualize spatial variability of a construction site's risk, generated by natural or technological hazard, through using hazard and vulnerability interaction matrices, between potential sources and potential surrounding targets. The proposed framework depends on using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), the potential global impact of facilities obtained from the interaction matrices, and the capabilities of GIS to generate results in the mapping form. The methodology is implemented in a real case project. The results show the capability of framework to visualize construction site risks due to natural or technological hazard, and also identify the most at risk position within a construction site.

[1]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Management of Construction Schedules Based on Building Information Modeling Technology , 2013 .

[2]  Maria Mavroulidou,et al.  A qualitative tool combining an interaction matrix and a GIS to map vulnerability to traffic induced air pollution. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  Javier Irizarry,et al.  Current Trends in Construction Site Layout Planning , 2014 .

[4]  Sandra Jerez,et al.  Domino Effects and Industrial Risks: Integrated Probabilistic Framework – Case of Tsunamis Effects , 2014 .

[5]  Osama A. Jannadi,et al.  RISK ASSESSMENT IN CONSTRUCTION , 2003 .

[6]  Joseph H. M. Tah,et al.  A fuzzy approach to constuction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system , 2001 .

[7]  Hyoun-Seok Moon,et al.  Development of a 4D object-based system for visualizing the risk information of construction projects , 2013 .

[8]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[9]  M.K.M. Charriere,et al.  Disaster Managers’ Perception of Effective Visual Risk Communication for General Public , 2012 .

[10]  Khaled A El-Rayes,et al.  GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION OF DYNAMIC SITE LAYOUT PLANNING IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS , 2009 .

[11]  J. Salagnac,et al.  Flood hazards and masonry constructions: a probabilistic framework for damage, risk and resilience at urban scale , 2012 .

[12]  Byungjoo Choi,et al.  Automated Information Retrieval for Hazard Identification in Construction Sites , 2013 .

[13]  A. Akintoye,et al.  Risk analysis and management in construction , 1997 .

[14]  Vitor Sousa,et al.  Risk-based management of occupational safety and health in the construction industry – Part 2: Quantitative model , 2015 .

[15]  Tzvi Raz,et al.  Use and benefits of tools for project risk management , 2001 .

[16]  Sandra Jerez,et al.  Explosions and Structural Fragments as Industrial Hazard: Domino Effect and Risks , 2012 .

[17]  Ahmed Mebarki,et al.  Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis for Restoration After Tsunamis and Floods: The Case of Dwellings and Industrial Plants , 2015 .

[18]  Panagiotis Mitropoulos,et al.  New Method for Measuring the Safety Risk of Construction Activities: Task Demand Assessment , 2011 .

[19]  M. X. Gao,et al.  A Simultaneous Route and Departure Time Choice Model for Evacuation Planning , 2007 .

[20]  Rafael Sacks,et al.  Construction Job Safety Analysis , 2010 .