A geometric approach to scaling individual distributions to macroecological patterns

Understanding macroecological patterns across scales is a central goal of ecology and a key need for conservation biology. Much research has focused on quantifying and understanding macroecological patterns such as the species-area relationship (SAR), the endemic-area relationship (EAR) and relative species abundance curve (RSA). Understanding how these aggregate patterns emerge from underlying spatial pattern at individual level, and how they relate to each other, has both basic and applied relevance. To address this challenge, we develop a novel spatially explicit geometric framework to understand multiple macroecological patterns, including the SAR, EAR, RSA, and their relationships. First, we provide a general theory that can be used to derive the asymptotic slopes of the SAR and EAR, and demonstrates the dependency of RSAs on the shape of the sampling region. Second, assuming specific shapes of the sampling region, species geographic ranges, and individual distribution patterns therein based on theory of stochastic point processes, we demonstrate various well-documented macroecological patterns can be recovered, including the tri-phasic SAR and various RSAs (e.g., Fisher's logseries and the Poisson lognormal distribution). We also demonstrate that a single equation unifies RSAs across scales, and provide a new prediction of the EAR. Finally, to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed model to ecological questions, we provide how beta diversity changes with spatial extent and its grain over multiple scales. Emergent macroecological patterns are often attributed to ecological and evolutionary mechanisms, but our geometric approach still can recover many previously observed patterns based on simple assumptions about species geographic ranges and the spatial distribution of individuals, emphasizing the importance of geometric considerations in macroecological studies.

[1]  A. Chao,et al.  Proposing a resolution to debates on diversity partitioning. , 2012, Ecology.

[2]  J. Plotkin,et al.  Species-area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Sandro Azaele,et al.  Downscaling species occupancy from coarse spatial scales. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  James Allan,et al.  Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets , 2016, Current Biology.

[5]  M. Bulmer On Fitting the Poisson Lognormal Distribution to Species-Abundance Data , 1974 .

[6]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1995 .

[7]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Species–area relationships always overestimate extinction rates from habitat loss , 2011, Nature.

[8]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[9]  R. G. Davies,et al.  Global Patterns of Geographic Range Size in Birds , 2006, PLoS biology.

[10]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[11]  R. Fisher,et al.  The Relation Between the Number of Species and the Number of Individuals in a Random Sample of an Animal Population , 1943 .

[12]  W. Jetz,et al.  Universal species–area and endemics–area relationships at continental scales , 2012, Nature.

[13]  B. McGill Does Mother Nature really prefer rare species or are log‐left‐skewed SADs a sampling artefact? , 2003 .

[14]  H. Possingham,et al.  Integrating regional conservation priorities for multiple objectives into national policy , 2015, Nature Communications.

[15]  James N Sanchirico,et al.  Returns from matching management resolution to ecological variation in a coral reef fishery , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns , 2008 .

[17]  G. Graves,et al.  Source pool geometry and the assembly of continental avifaunas , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  B. D. Coleman On random placement and species-area relations , 1981 .

[19]  A. Chao,et al.  Bridging the variance and diversity decomposition approaches to beta diversity via similarity and differentiation measures , 2016 .

[20]  Ethan P. White,et al.  An extensive comparison of species-abundance distribution models , 2015, bioRxiv.

[21]  A. Chao,et al.  Phylogenetic beta diversity, similarity, and differentiation measures based on Hill numbers , 2014 .

[22]  K. Gaston Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation , 1998 .

[23]  Amos Maritan,et al.  Towards a unified descriptive theory for spatial ecology: predicting biodiversity patterns across spatial scales , 2015 .

[24]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications , 1989 .

[25]  M. MacNeil,et al.  Commonness and rarity in the marine biosphere , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Spatially explicit approach to estimation of total population abundance in field surveys. , 2018, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A theory for ecological survey methods to map individual distributions , 2017, Theoretical Ecology.

[28]  R. Didham,et al.  The spatial scaling of beta diversity , 2013 .

[29]  L. Jost Partitioning diversity into independent alpha and beta components. , 2007, Ecology.

[30]  F. W. Preston Time and Space and the Variation of Species , 1960 .

[31]  Joshua B. Plotkin,et al.  SAMPLING THE SPECIES COMPOSITION OF A LANDSCAPE , 2002 .

[32]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection , 2014, Science.

[33]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[34]  R. Gregory Abundance patterns of European breeding birds , 2000 .

[35]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[36]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[37]  A. P. Allen,et al.  Effects of range size on species–area relationships , 2003 .

[38]  D. Karlis,et al.  Mixed Poisson Distributions , 2005 .

[39]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Fitting and comparing competing models of the species abundance distribution: assessment and prospect , 2014 .

[40]  Nao Takashina,et al.  Exploring the effect of the spatial scale of fishery management. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[42]  Jayanth R Banavar,et al.  Spatial aggregation and the species-area relationship across scales. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[43]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[44]  R. May Patterns of species abundance and diversity , 1975 .

[45]  L. Jost Entropy and diversity , 2006 .