Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure comparing transradial and transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures: rationale and design of the minimizing adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic implementation of angioX - RAdiation Dose study (RAD-M

[1]  P. Kolh,et al.  Perspectives on the 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization , 2015, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[2]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Radiation Protection in Cardiovascular Interventions: What Can We Do? , 2015, Medical Principles and Practice.

[3]  C. Indolfi,et al.  Left radial access for percutaneous coronary procedures: from neglected to performer? A meta-analysis of 14 studies including 7,603 procedures. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[4]  B. Rangan,et al.  A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention). , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  A. Shroff,et al.  A review of radiation exposures associated with radial cardiac catheterisation. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Piek,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction : from procedural considerations to long term outcomes , 2015 .

[7]  Ariel Roguin,et al.  Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  L. Jacoby.  Effects of Radial versus Femoral Artery Access in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes with or without ST-segment Elevation , 2013 .

[9]  Binita Shah,et al.  Radiation exposure during coronary angiography via transradial or transfemoral approaches when performed by experienced operators. , 2013, American heart journal.

[10]  P. Gao,et al.  Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized RIVAL trial. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  R. Diletti,et al.  Operator exposure to x-ray in left and right radial access during percutaneous coronary procedures: OPERA randomised study , 2013, Heart.

[12]  R. Rajani,et al.  Coronary stent implantation technique: prolonged inflation time maximizes stent expansion. , 2013, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[13]  E. Romagnoli,et al.  Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Karim Ratib,et al.  Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study. , 2012, American heart journal.

[15]  C. Trani,et al.  Comparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of transradial coronary angiography via right versus left radial artery approaches (from the PREVAIL Study). , 2012, The American journal of cardiology.

[16]  K. Wilson,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[17]  D Regulla,et al.  A review of the scientific basis for radiation protection of the patient. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[18]  A. M. Leone,et al.  Evaluation of the "learning curve" for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary procedures. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  Operator Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Procedures Through the Left or Right Radial Approach: The TALENT Dosimetric Substudy , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[20]  Changchun Xie,et al.  Radial artery access as a predictor of increased radiation exposure during a diagnostic cardiac catheterization procedure. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  S. Fichtlscherer,et al.  Implementation of the transradial approach for coronary procedures is not associated with an elevated complication rate and elevated radiation patient exposure. , 2011, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[22]  Sunil V. Rao,et al.  The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  H. Jia.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and intervention procedures , 2010 .

[24]  I. Sperduti,et al.  Transradial access compared with femoral puncture closure devices in percutaneous coronary procedures. , 2009, International journal of cardiology.

[25]  D. Bandorski,et al.  A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. , 2009, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[26]  G. Ambrosio,et al.  Arterial access-site-related outcomes of patients undergoing invasive coronary procedures for acute coronary syndromes (from the ComPaRison of Early Invasive and Conservative Treatment in Patients With Non-ST-ElevatiOn Acute Coronary Syndromes [PRESTO-ACS] Vascular Substudy). , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  Salim Yusuf,et al.  Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2009, American heart journal.

[28]  Eugenio Picano,et al.  Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the National Research Council's Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII Report. , 2009, American heart journal.

[29]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age , 2008, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[30]  R. Stables,et al.  Comparison of operator radiation exposure with optimized radiation protection devices during coronary angiograms and ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions by radial and femoral routes. , 2008, European heart journal.

[31]  H. Lange,et al.  Randomized comparison of operator radiation exposure during coronary angiography and intervention by radial or femoral approach , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[32]  G. Biondi-Zoccai,et al.  Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[33]  J. Persliden,et al.  Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access , 2004, European Radiology.

[34]  S. Akyar,et al.  Comparison of effective doses obtained from dose-area product and air kerma measurements in interventional radiology. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[35]  Sun Quanhua.  Transradial Approach for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2004 .

[36]  M. Sandborg,et al.  Evaluation of patient-absorbed doses during coronary angiography and intervention by femoral and radial artery access , 2004, European Radiology.

[37]  A. Dibié,et al.  Factors influencing fluoroscopy time and dose-area product values during ad hoc one-vessel percutaneous coronary angioplasty. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[38]  D. Cohen,et al.  Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison. , 1999, American heart journal.

[39]  E Vañó,et al.  Radiation exposure to medical staff in interventional and cardiac radiology. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[40]  H. Aldridge,et al.  Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. , 1997, The Canadian journal of cardiology.